At 14:08 22/06/2004, Andi Gutmans wrote:
At 06:59 PM 6/19/2004 +0100, Lester Caine wrote:

p.s. Thanks Jan - 15 mins and everything was running fine, so now I just need to sort out how to replace the 'extra' bits. Not done a comprehensive test, but php.net working fine on W2k/Apache2/PHP5 as was probably expected. The fun will come with running an update ;)

Sounds good.
I assume you didn't check the bugs database right? We should check that too, and if possible, I suggest we install 5.0.0-dev on php.net as soon as possible. Can anyone think of other stuff we need to test before upgrading?
It would also be nice to write a short case study on php.net once we're done to explain what things did have to be fixed and how much time the process took.

One thing we could do pretty easily, I guess, is to add something like v5.php.net, which will be a complete replica of www.php.net, but running on PHP 5. We're doing something similar with zend.com right now (it actually runs quite well, except for some broken array_merge() behavior). Then we can have bugs.v5.php.net and so on, so that we can test everything before we actually upgrade.


Any objections / thoughts?

Zeev

--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php



Reply via email to