2010/4/15 Derick Rethans :
> On Tue, 13 Apr 2010, Felix De Vliegher wrote:
>
>> Update: http://phpbenelux.eu/array_seek-return.patch.txt
>> I've kept the fseek()-style return values (0 when fine, -1 when seek
>> fails)
>> >>>
>> >>> Any reason why you picked that over the (IMO more
On Tue, 13 Apr 2010, Felix De Vliegher wrote:
> Update: http://phpbenelux.eu/array_seek-return.patch.txt
> I've kept the fseek()-style return values (0 when fine, -1 when seek
> fails)
> >>>
> >>> Any reason why you picked that over the (IMO more logical) true/false
> >>> approac
On 12-apr-2010, at 10:20, Derick Rethans wrote:
> On Mon, 22 Mar 2010, Felix De Vliegher wrote:
>
>> On 17-mrt-2010, at 19:09, Derick Rethans wrote:
>>
>>> On Wed, 17 Mar 2010, Felix De Vliegher wrote:
>>>
On 17-mrt-2010, at 17:52, Derick Rethans wrote:
> On Wed, 17 Mar 2010, Fel
On Mon, 22 Mar 2010, Felix De Vliegher wrote:
> On 17-mrt-2010, at 19:09, Derick Rethans wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 17 Mar 2010, Felix De Vliegher wrote:
> >
> >> On 17-mrt-2010, at 17:52, Derick Rethans wrote:
> >>
> >>> On Wed, 17 Mar 2010, Felix De Vliegher wrote:
> >>>
> On 17-mrt-2010, at
On 17-mrt-2010, at 19:09, Derick Rethans wrote:
> On Wed, 17 Mar 2010, Felix De Vliegher wrote:
>
>> On 17-mrt-2010, at 17:52, Derick Rethans wrote:
>>
>>> On Wed, 17 Mar 2010, Felix De Vliegher wrote:
>>>
On 17-mrt-2010, at 17:27, Frederic Hardy wrote:
>
> Why not use arrayIterat
Update: http://phpbenelux.eu/array_seek-return.patch.txt
I've kept the fseek()-style return values (0 when fine, -1 when seek fails)
Any reason why you picked that over the (IMO more logical) true/false
approach?
No, just to keep it similar to fseek(). Either way works for me.
I would expect
On 17-mrt-2010, at 19:09, Derick Rethans wrote:
> On Wed, 17 Mar 2010, Felix De Vliegher wrote:
>
>> On 17-mrt-2010, at 17:52, Derick Rethans wrote:
>>
>>> On Wed, 17 Mar 2010, Felix De Vliegher wrote:
>>>
On 17-mrt-2010, at 17:27, Frederic Hardy wrote:
>
> Why not use arrayIterat
On Wed, 17 Mar 2010, Felix De Vliegher wrote:
> On 17-mrt-2010, at 17:52, Derick Rethans wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 17 Mar 2010, Felix De Vliegher wrote:
> >
> >> On 17-mrt-2010, at 17:27, Frederic Hardy wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Why not use arrayIterator::seek() ?
> >>
> >> Because the functionality isn't
On 17-mrt-2010, at 17:52, Derick Rethans wrote:
> On Wed, 17 Mar 2010, Felix De Vliegher wrote:
>
>> On 17-mrt-2010, at 17:27, Frederic Hardy wrote:
>>>
>>> Why not use arrayIterator::seek() ?
>>
>> Because the functionality isn't exactly the same.
>> ArrayIterator::seek() only sets the array
On Wed, 17 Mar 2010, Felix De Vliegher wrote:
> On 17-mrt-2010, at 17:27, Frederic Hardy wrote:
> >
> > Why not use arrayIterator::seek() ?
>
> Because the functionality isn't exactly the same.
> ArrayIterator::seek() only sets the array pointer, array_seek would
> also return the value + have
On 17-mrt-2010, at 17:27, Frederic Hardy wrote:
>
> Hello Felix !
>
> Why not use arrayIterator::seek() ?
>
> Best regards,
> Fred
Because the functionality isn't exactly the same. ArrayIterator::seek() only
sets the array pointer, array_seek would also return the value + have
fseek()-like fu
> Hi Patrick
>
> That's of course possible, but that would only allow seeking to a relative
> position to where the array pointer is at that moment. The functionality also
> gets a bit ambiguous by adding an optional parameter. You're not going to the
> next or prev position of the array anymore
2010/3/16 Felix De Vliegher :
Hi all
I recently needed seek functionality in arrays, and couldn't find it in the
regular set of array functions, so I wrote a function for it. (Seek = getting
an array value based on the position (or offset, if you want to call it like
that), and not the key of
On 17-mrt-2010, at 17:00, Patrick ALLAERT wrote:
> 2010/3/16 Felix De Vliegher :
>> Hi all
>>
>> I recently needed seek functionality in arrays, and couldn't find it in the
>> regular set of array functions, so I wrote a function for it. (Seek =
>> getting an array value based on the position (
2010/3/16 Felix De Vliegher :
> Hi all
>
> I recently needed seek functionality in arrays, and couldn't find it in the
> regular set of array functions, so I wrote a function for it. (Seek = getting
> an array value based on the position (or offset, if you want to call it like
> that), and not t
On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 04:07:36PM +0100, Pierre Joye wrote:
>
> Please double check what the patch does, test it, and think again
> about this question (hint: pos != key) :)
And once again, skimming emails (can you say ADD? I knew you could.)
bites me in the tush. :) I just looked at the first
On Wed, 17 Mar 2010, Daniel Convissor wrote:
> > $input = array(3, 'bar', 'baz');
> > echo array_seek($input, 2); // returns 'baz'
> > echo array_seek($input, 0); // returns 3
> > echo array_seek($input, 5); // returns NULL, emits an out of range warning
>
> Why waste time calling a function when
On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 4:02 PM, Daniel Convissor
wrote:
> Hi:
>
>> $input = array(3, 'bar', 'baz');
>> echo array_seek($input, 2); // returns 'baz'
>> echo array_seek($input, 0); // returns 3
>> echo array_seek($input, 5); // returns NULL, emits an out of range warning
>
> Why waste time calling
Hi:
> $input = array(3, 'bar', 'baz');
> echo array_seek($input, 2); // returns 'baz'
> echo array_seek($input, 0); // returns 3
> echo array_seek($input, 5); // returns NULL, emits an out of range warning
Why waste time calling a function when this can be done right now by
acting on the array i
Hi
As SEEK_END only makes sense with zero or negative offsets (for arrays anyway),
I've come up with an implementation for SEEK_END:
http://phpbenelux.eu/array_seek.patch.txt
So you can do:
$arr = array('a', 'b', 'c', 'd');
echo array_seek($arr, -2, SEEK_END); // outputs 'b'
echo array_seek($arr
> -Original Message-
> From: Felix De Vliegher [mailto:felix.devlieg...@gmail.com]
> Sent: 16 March 2010 13:31
> To: PHP internals
> Subject: [PHP-DEV] array_seek function
>
> Hi all
>
> I recently needed seek functionality in arrays, and couldn't
Right now, it returns the value of a given position.
How it's different from:
array_slice() returns the sequence of elements from the array array as
specified by the offset and length parameters?
array_slice returns an array of elements. This function would return the
value at the given posi
Hi!
Right now, it returns the value of a given position.
How it's different from:
array_slice() returns the sequence of elements from the array array as
specified by the offset and length parameters?
--
Stanislav Malyshev, Zend Software Architect
s...@zend.com http://www.zend.com/
(408
On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 4:22 PM, Derick Rethans wrote:
> I was also thinking, can we just make this work just like fseek (with a
> "whence" parameter) as well? (http://uk3.php.net/fseek)
Hi,
not sure how SEEK_END is supposed to work with arrays but here is
SEEK_SET and SEEK_CUR (with positive an
On Tue, 16 Mar 2010, Felix De Vliegher wrote:
> On 16-mrt-2010, at 17:07, Derick Rethans wrote:
>
> > On Tue, 16 Mar 2010, Felix De Vliegher wrote:
> >
> >> Right now, it returns the value of a given position. In that case,
> >> array_get_pos might be a better name. Oh, and I attached the patch
On 16-mrt-2010, at 17:07, Derick Rethans wrote:
> On Tue, 16 Mar 2010, Felix De Vliegher wrote:
>
>> Right now, it returns the value of a given position. In that case,
>> array_get_pos might be a better name. Oh, and I attached the patch
>> with .txt extension :)
>
> Does it also seek the arra
On Tue, 16 Mar 2010, Felix De Vliegher wrote:
> Right now, it returns the value of a given position. In that case,
> array_get_pos might be a better name. Oh, and I attached the patch
> with .txt extension :)
Does it also seek the array pointer? Because I think array_seek that
moves the pointe
On 16 March 2010 13:30, Felix De Vliegher wrote:
> Hi all
>
> I recently needed seek functionality in arrays, and couldn't find it in the
> regular set of array functions, so I wrote a function for it. (Seek = getting
> an array value based on the position (or offset, if you want to call it like
Hi Pierre
Right now, it returns the value of a given position. In that case,
array_get_pos might be a better name. Oh, and I attached the patch with .txt
extension :)
Greetings,
Felix
Index: ext/standard/array.c
===
--- ext/standa
hi Felix,
Not sure about the usefulness of this function but the name is
misleading (pls reattach the patch as .txt while being at it :). Does
it set the position (_seek) or does it return the value of a given
position (_get_pos)? or both (no idea :)?
Cheers,
Cheers,
On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 2:3
Hi all
I recently needed seek functionality in arrays, and couldn't find it in the
regular set of array functions, so I wrote a function for it. (Seek = getting
an array value based on the position (or offset, if you want to call it like
that), and not the key of the item)
Basically you can us
31 matches
Mail list logo
