On 17-mrt-2010, at 17:52, Derick Rethans wrote: > On Wed, 17 Mar 2010, Felix De Vliegher wrote: > >> On 17-mrt-2010, at 17:27, Frederic Hardy wrote: >>> >>> Why not use arrayIterator::seek() ? >> >> Because the functionality isn't exactly the same. >> ArrayIterator::seek() only sets the array pointer, array_seek would >> also return the value + have fseek()-like functionality with the >> SEEK_* consts and optional negative offsets. > > To be honest, I'd rather have the proposed array_seek() return a status > whether the seek worked or not. Notices are uncool and you can already > retrieve data/key with key() and current(). >
Update: http://phpbenelux.eu/array_seek-return.patch.txt I've kept the fseek()-style return values (0 when fine, -1 when seek fails) Cheers, Felix -- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
