On Wed, 17 Mar 2010, Felix De Vliegher wrote: > On 17-mrt-2010, at 17:27, Frederic Hardy wrote: > > > > Why not use arrayIterator::seek() ? > > Because the functionality isn't exactly the same. > ArrayIterator::seek() only sets the array pointer, array_seek would > also return the value + have fseek()-like functionality with the > SEEK_* consts and optional negative offsets.
To be honest, I'd rather have the proposed array_seek() return a status whether the seek worked or not. Notices are uncool and you can already retrieve data/key with key() and current(). with kind regards, Derick -- http://derickrethans.nl | http://xdebug.org Like Xdebug? Consider a donation: http://xdebug.org/donate.php twitter: @derickr and @xdebug -- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
