> On 2 Dec 2014, at 21:44, Andrea Faulds wrote:
>
> Good evening once again,
>
> I’m putting the ZPP Failure on Overflow RFC to a vote. This RFC is an
> important prerequisite to the Big Integer Support RFC, as it ensures safety
> in implicit integer parameter conversions.
>
> The RFC requir
Andrea Faulds wrote on 09/12/2014 14:10:
On 9 Dec 2014, at 13:23, Rowan Collins wrote:
Xinchen Hui wrote on 09/12/2014 03:39:
but I suggest change it to "expects parameter 1 to be long,
double(which is beyond long range) given in %s on line %d"
Note that in master, the messages have been chan
> On 9 Dec 2014, at 13:23, Rowan Collins wrote:
>
> Xinchen Hui wrote on 09/12/2014 03:39:
>> but I suggest change it to "expects parameter 1 to be long,
>> double(which is beyond long range) given in %s on line %d"
>
> Note that in master, the messages have been changed to (correctly) not
> m
Xinchen Hui wrote on 09/12/2014 03:39:
but I suggest change it to "expects parameter 1 to be long,
double(which is beyond long range) given in %s on line %d"
Note that in master, the messages have been changed to (correctly) not
mention the C types, only the PHP ones, so it would be more like
Hi!
> On 9 Dec 2014, at 03:39, Xinchen Hui wrote:
>
> Hey:
> that will confuse people, why 12.2 is okey (it's also a double value).
>
> anyway, I am not a native english speaker, not sure what is the most
> proper warning message.
>
> but I suggest change it to "expects parameter 1 to be long
Hey:
On Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 7:15 PM, Andrea Faulds wrote:
>
>> On 8 Dec 2014, at 08:22, Xinchen Hui wrote:
>
>> the current warning message is :" expects parameter 1 to be long,
>> double given in %s on line %d"
>>
>> but maybe it should be something like: "expects parameter 1 to be
>> long, dou
> On 8 Dec 2014, at 06:24, Joe Watkins wrote:
>
> Morning Andrea,
>
>I think it's okay to assume that people are winding down for the
> holiday, possibly some people are already on holiday.
>
>Because of the time of year, you might want to leave the vote open
> another week, or until t
> On 8 Dec 2014, at 08:22, Xinchen Hui wrote:
> the current warning message is :" expects parameter 1 to be long,
> double given in %s on line %d"
>
> but maybe it should be something like: "expects parameter 1 to be
> long, double(which is beyond long range) given in %s on line %d"?
>
> since
Hey:
On Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 6:03 AM, Andrea Faulds wrote:
>
> Hi!
>
> We’re now half-way through voting on this RFC, and only three people, two if
> I’m excluded, have voted. I realise it’s a rather technical and obscure
> matter, but I am a little worried by how few people have voted so far.
On Sun, 2014-12-07 at 22:03 +, Andrea Faulds wrote:
> Hi!
>
> We’re now half-way through voting on this RFC, and only three people, two if
> I’m excluded, have voted. I realise it’s a rather technical and obscure
> matter, but I am a little worried by how few people have voted so far. Three
Hi!
We’re now half-way through voting on this RFC, and only three people, two if
I’m excluded, have voted. I realise it’s a rather technical and obscure matter,
but I am a little worried by how few people have voted so far. Three votes is
hardly enough to justify a change.
If you missed the o
11 matches
Mail list logo
