On Sun, 2014-12-07 at 22:03 +0000, Andrea Faulds wrote:
> Hi!
>
> We’re now half-way through voting on this RFC, and only three people, two if
> I’m excluded, have voted. I realise it’s a rather technical and obscure
> matter, but I am a little worried by how few people have voted so far. Three
> votes is hardly enough to justify a change.
>
> If you missed the original announcement, hopefully this reminder will reach
> you. Here it is, repeated:
>
> > On 2 Dec 2014, at 21:44, Andrea Faulds <a...@ajf.me> wrote:
> >
> > I’m putting the ZPP Failure on Overflow RFC to a vote. This RFC is an
> > important prerequisite to the Big Integer Support RFC, as it ensures safety
> > in implicit integer parameter conversions.
> >
> > The RFC requires a 2/3 majority, and voting starts today (2014-12-02) and
> > ends in 10 days’ time next Friday (2014-12-12).
> >
> > Please read the RFC carefully. If you have any doubts or queries about the
> > RFC, please don’t hesitate to ask me.
> >
> > The RFC and voting widget can be found here:
> > https://wiki.php.net/rfc/zpp_fail_on_overflow
>
> Thanks!
>
> --
> Andrea Faulds
> http://ajf.me/
>
>
>
>
>
Morning Andrea,
I think it's okay to assume that people are winding down for the
holiday, possibly some people are already on holiday.
Because of the time of year, you might want to leave the vote open
another week, or until the number of votes justifies the change.
Cheers
Joe
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
