2012.08.03. 11:29, "hakre" ezt írta:
>
> > Von: Adam Harvey
>
> > Gesendet: 10:58 Donnerstag, 2.August 2012
> > Betreff: Re: [PHP-DEV] PHP 5.x Documentend End Of Life Dates
> >
> > On 2 August 2012 16:51, Morgan L. Owens wrote:
> >> On 20
> Von: Adam Harvey
> Gesendet: 10:58 Donnerstag, 2.August 2012
> Betreff: Re: [PHP-DEV] PHP 5.x Documentend End Of Life Dates
>
> On 2 August 2012 16:51, Morgan L. Owens wrote:
>> On 2012-08-02 20:42, Peter Cowburn wrote:
>>> The details on things bein
Lester Caine wrote:
As an update, I've now pushed the remaining changes to /releases to
make this "live" (in the sense of being linked from somewhere). I've
left it in the sidebar for now, rather than adding it to the blurb on
that page.
Thanks for that useful crib sheet ...
Another useful refe
Adam Harvey wrote:
As an update, I've now pushed the remaining changes to /releases to
make this "live" (in the sense of being linked from somewhere). I've
left it in the sidebar for now, rather than adding it to the blurb on
that page.
Thanks for that useful crib sheet ...
Another useful refer
On 2 August 2012 16:58, Adam Harvey wrote:
> On 2 August 2012 16:51, Morgan L. Owens wrote:
>> On 2012-08-02 20:42, Peter Cowburn wrote:
>>> The details on things being "obsoleted" should be in the migration guides.
>>>
>> Then that would be where the links go, in a similar manner to the Changelo
> No date for 5.3 yet. Depends how development goes on the next version
> after 5.4. EOL announcements are in the release announcements. 5.2 EOL
> was announced here: http://www.php.net/archive/2010.php#id2010-07-22-1
Yes, I've seen that with release announcements often (but not always) a
(more
> I've added http://php.net/eol
Thank you. For PHP 5.x I had created a blog post which is not that complete
just reflects the work on scanning through the news items:
http://hakre.wordpress.com/2012/07/30/historic-php-end-of-life-dates/
I started this to create a timeline graphic, a first draf
On 2 August 2012 16:51, Morgan L. Owens wrote:
> On 2012-08-02 20:42, Peter Cowburn wrote:
>> The details on things being "obsoleted" should be in the migration guides.
>>
> Then that would be where the links go, in a similar manner to the Changelog
> links.
I've added links to the migration guid
On 2012-08-02 20:42, Peter Cowburn wrote:
On 2 August 2012 09:36, Morgan L. Owens wrote:
Just as each release announcement dated with detailed kept on a distinct
page (linked in that list), all that's needed there is a date when support
ended, with (any available) information on what was obsole
On 2 August 2012 09:36, Morgan L. Owens wrote:
> Just as each release announcement dated with detailed kept on a distinct
> page (linked in that list), all that's needed there is a date when support
> ended, with (any available) information on what was obsoleted in the process
> also on a distinct
Adam Harvey wrote:
Thoughts? (Do we even want to auto-fill this from $OLDRELEASES, or
would we rather have a manual array?) Specific notes on
vulnerabilities to add to branches? Better versions of the copy in the
initial blurb?
A little academic now, but I was convinced that 5.1 had some more o
On 2012-08-02 19:56, Peter Cowburn wrote:
On 2 August 2012 07:35, Adam Harvey wrote:
Thoughts? (Do we even want to auto-fill this from $OLDRELEASES, or
would we rather have a manual array?) Specific notes on
vulnerabilities to add to branches? Better versions of the copy in the
initial blurb?
On 2 August 2012 15:56, Peter Cowburn wrote:
> On 2 August 2012 07:35, Adam Harvey wrote:
>> Thoughts? (Do we even want to auto-fill this from $OLDRELEASES, or
>> would we rather have a manual array?) Specific notes on
>> vulnerabilities to add to branches? Better versions of the copy in the
>> i
On 2 August 2012 07:35, Adam Harvey wrote:
> Thoughts? (Do we even want to auto-fill this from $OLDRELEASES, or
> would we rather have a manual array?) Specific notes on
> vulnerabilities to add to branches? Better versions of the copy in the
> initial blurb?
Why is this information not just disp
On 2 August 2012 13:00, Adam Harvey wrote:
> On 2 August 2012 12:30, Kris Craig wrote:
>> First we'll need to consolidate the information regarding when each version
>> was EOL'd. Are they all in news announcements, or are they scattered
>> between announcements, listserv threads, etc? If we're
On 2 August 2012 12:30, Kris Craig wrote:
> First we'll need to consolidate the information regarding when each version
> was EOL'd. Are they all in news announcements, or are they scattered
> between announcements, listserv threads, etc? If we're going to do this,
> we may as well cover as many
On Wed, Aug 1, 2012 at 11:45 AM, Rasmus Lerdorf wrote:
> On 08/01/2012 11:16 AM, Ángel González wrote:
>
> > There should be a page like http://www.php.net/ancient-versions listing
> the
> > versions with the date they went EOL and how much time has passed since
> > them.
> > Some scary warnings
On 08/01/2012 01:24 PM, Kris Craig wrote:
There should be a page like http://www.php.net/ancient-versions listing
the
versions with the date they went EOL and how much time has passed since
them.
Some scary warnings about "Known remote code execution vulnerabe" may be
good too.
The goal? To serve
On Wed, Aug 1, 2012 at 8:16 PM, Ángel González wrote:
> On 01/08/12 20:02, Kris Craig wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 1, 2012 at 6:13 AM, hakre wrote:
> >
> >> I have some simple questions about PHP 5.x End Of Life (EOL) dates:
> >>
> >> PHP 5.0 - Is there some official news-item or changelog entry on
>
On 08/01/2012 11:16 AM, Ángel González wrote:
> There should be a page like http://www.php.net/ancient-versions listing the
> versions with the date they went EOL and how much time has passed since
> them.
> Some scary warnings about "Known remote code execution vulnerabe" may be
> good too.
> The
On Wed, Aug 1, 2012 at 11:16 AM, Ángel González wrote:
> On 01/08/12 20:02, Kris Craig wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 1, 2012 at 6:13 AM, hakre wrote:
> >
> >> I have some simple questions about PHP 5.x End Of Life (EOL) dates:
> >>
> >> PHP 5.0 - Is there some official news-item or changelog entry on
>
On 01/08/12 20:02, Kris Craig wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 1, 2012 at 6:13 AM, hakre wrote:
>
>> I have some simple questions about PHP 5.x End Of Life (EOL) dates:
>>
>> PHP 5.0 - Is there some official news-item or changelog entry on php.netthat
>> says at which date PHP 5.0 went End Of Life?
>>
>> PHP
On 08/01/2012 06:13 AM, hakre wrote:
> I have some simple questions about PHP 5.x End Of Life (EOL) dates:
>
> PHP 5.0 - Is there some official news-item or changelog entry on php.net that
> says at which date PHP 5.0 went End Of Life?
>
> PHP 5.2 - Does the "End Of Support" that was announced t
On Wed, Aug 1, 2012 at 6:13 AM, hakre wrote:
> I have some simple questions about PHP 5.x End Of Life (EOL) dates:
>
> PHP 5.0 - Is there some official news-item or changelog entry on php.netthat
> says at which date PHP 5.0 went End Of Life?
>
> PHP 5.2 - Does the "End Of Support" that was anno
I have some simple questions about PHP 5.x End Of Life (EOL) dates:
PHP 5.0 - Is there some official news-item or changelog entry on php.net that
says at which date PHP 5.0 went End Of Life?
PHP 5.2 - Does the "End Of Support" that was announced twice for PHP 5.2 has
the same meaning as "End Of
25 matches
Mail list logo
