On 2 August 2012 15:56, Peter Cowburn <petercowb...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 2 August 2012 07:35, Adam Harvey <ahar...@php.net> wrote: >> Thoughts? (Do we even want to auto-fill this from $OLDRELEASES, or >> would we rather have a manual array?) Specific notes on >> vulnerabilities to add to branches? Better versions of the copy in the >> initial blurb? > > Why is this information not just displayed on "Unsupported Historical > Releases" (/releases)? Do you have plans for the EOL page that > wouldn't be suitable for the other one? My worry is spreading this > information across multiple places, when we already have a very > detailed page about unsupported versions. The X.Y version table could > be listed at the top of /releases to give a quick summary, before the > detail for each individual version listed chronologically. We could > add more notes like the existing "Support for PHP 4 has been > discontinued since 2007-12-31." at the appropriate places in that > list.
That could definitely work as well. I've done it as a separate page because that was the suggestion from Kris and Larry (and because I wasn't really sure how it would come together to start with), but there's no particular reason it couldn't be integrated into /releases. It probably is short enough. Adam -- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
