If you don't know why it's wrong to tell them they are stupid, and can't
be bother spending an extra 10 seconds formulating a respectable
response instead, then you are the wrong person for the job.
Jani Taskinen wrote:
On Thu, 15 Sep 2005, Leigh Makewell wrote:
Well then I
If you are getting that much hate mail then you are doing it wrong.
Leigh.
Jani Taskinen wrote:
On Thu, 15 Sep 2005, Leigh Makewell wrote:
joke. People critisise and joke about PHP's automatic "Bogus" bot that
just trolls through the database and marks any submitted bugs as
Rasmus Lerdorf wrote:
That's fine, and you shouldn't care, I agree. I argued much the same
point just yesterday in a chat with Ilia. You do however seem to be
glossing over the fact that this new check can be very helpful. Take
this case:
sort(array(3,2,1));
Or any other example where the
Zeev Suraski wrote:
Let me let you in on a secret as well. This tone isn't going to get you
anywhere.
No it won't. But the diplomatic one didn't get us anything except
insults and put downs. This approach has at least got some serious
attention. :)
For the record, I was against fixing th
Rasmus Lerdorf wrote:
Well, that is the point, it didn't actually work. Code similar to this
caused memory corruption. So while you may not have seen an instant
crash, over time and in certain conditions you would get unexplained
crashes. In order to fix this bug we needed to check for this so
Rasmus Lerdorf wrote:
This is where it gets tricky. Is this legal code?
Yes it is legal because it worked. Whether it is strictly "correct" or
not is another argument. People write bad code all the time, but it
doesn't make it any less legal. In minor version changes BC is not a
secondary p
Derick Rethans wrote:
On Wed, 14 Sep 2005, Leigh Makewell wrote:
Derick Rethans wrote:
I doubt any application would really stopped working - except for a friendly
notice when people wrote bad code.
Except if you had read Colin's messages you would see that his code *had*
stopped wo
Derick Rethans wrote:
I doubt any application would really stopped working - except for a
friendly notice when people wrote bad code.
Derick
Except if you had read Colin's messages you would see that his code
*had* stopped working.
Leigh :)
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mail
Pierre Joye wrote:
No, 4.3.x is a dead branche. But the problem is much more easier to
fix in 4.4.0. Do what you always do in production servers, do not
display errors/notices, especially as 4.4.0 raises only notices for
the reference problem.
Regards,
--Pierre
Well that is exactly why this i
