On 28/08/12 18:14, Will Fitch wrote:
You're right. My apologies.
Good, I was a little worried that I might have missed something you
didn't. It's all well and good.
--
Andrew Faulds
http://ajf.me/
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php
You're right. My apologies.
On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 1:11 PM, Andrew Faulds wrote:
> On 28/08/12 18:07, Will Fitch wrote:
>
>> I just noticed the RFC is listed in the Accepted category. Did something
>> change with the 2/3rds voting requirement? Right now, it stands at 64%
>> Yes.
>>
> Sorry,
On 28/08/12 18:07, Will Fitch wrote:
I just noticed the RFC is listed in the Accepted category. Did something
change with the 2/3rds voting requirement? Right now, it stands at 64% Yes.
Sorry, disregard that previous email. I didn't look at the vote before
sending it.
If you look at the vote
On 28/08/12 18:07, Will Fitch wrote:
I just noticed the RFC is listed in the Accepted category. Did something
change with the 2/3rds voting requirement? Right now, it stands at 64% Yes.
I think some naughty folks might have snuck votes in after voting was
over. It was certainly >64% when accep
I just noticed the RFC is listed in the Accepted category. Did something
change with the 2/3rds voting requirement? Right now, it stands at 64% Yes.
On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 4:18 AM, Pierre Joye wrote:
> hi,
>
> On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 2:21 AM, Johannes Schlüter
> wrote:
> > On Sun, 2012-08-26
On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 5:55 PM, Alain Williams wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 11:28:07AM -0400, Anthony Ferrara wrote:
> > >
> > > Hello all,
> > >
> > > Since the discussion has died down around the concept, I have updated
> the
> > > RFC and moved it into Proposed (under discussion) status.
On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 11:28:07AM -0400, Anthony Ferrara wrote:
> >
> > Hello all,
> >
> > Since the discussion has died down around the concept, I have updated the
> > RFC and moved it into Proposed (under discussion) status.
> >
> > I have updated the RFC to include a section on discussion point
>
> Hello all,
>
> Since the discussion has died down around the concept, I have updated the
> RFC and moved it into Proposed (under discussion) status.
>
> I have updated the RFC to include a section on discussion points
> containing points that I know were raised but I felt were not closed (there
> De : nicolas.gre...@gmail.com [mailto:nicolas.gre...@gmail.com
> Envoyé : vendredi 24 août 2012 09:24
>
> > 1) PHP Errors come with a severity code and a string message. You
> want
> > to handle specific errors in a specific way? You better start writing
> > giant regexes parsing the string messa
hi,
On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 2:21 AM, Johannes Schlüter
wrote:
> On Sun, 2012-08-26 at 21:07 +0300, Yahav Gindi Bar wrote:
>> On Sun, Aug 26, 2012 at 9:00 PM, Will Fitch wrote:
>>
>> > Maybe the simplest solution is we have a minimum participation rate before
>> > voting can be closed?
>> >
>> Th
10 matches
Mail list logo
