hi, On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 2:21 AM, Johannes Schlüter <johan...@schlueters.de> wrote: > On Sun, 2012-08-26 at 21:07 +0300, Yahav Gindi Bar wrote: >> On Sun, Aug 26, 2012 at 9:00 PM, Will Fitch <willfi...@php.net> wrote: >> >> > Maybe the simplest solution is we have a minimum participation rate before >> > voting can be closed? >> > >> Though it make sense - it's a problem, because it'll delay and reject some >> useful features because of requirements issue. > > If it is useful it should have enough supporters, else it most likely > isn't useful. While there should be an option to actively abstain from > voting.
I am not sure the usefulness of this option, but it is possible to add a blank field ot any vote. If the idea is to say 'I do not care enough to vote yes or no' then simply vote no as one obviously either did not the RFC or do not want it. But this is off topic again in this thread, what's about creating a separate one if you feel like we need to refine this process? Cheers, -- Pierre @pierrejoye | http://blog.thepimp.net | http://www.libgd.org -- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
