I just noticed the RFC is listed in the Accepted category. Did something change with the 2/3rds voting requirement? Right now, it stands at 64% Yes.
On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 4:18 AM, Pierre Joye <pierre....@gmail.com> wrote: > hi, > > On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 2:21 AM, Johannes Schlüter > <johan...@schlueters.de> wrote: > > On Sun, 2012-08-26 at 21:07 +0300, Yahav Gindi Bar wrote: > >> On Sun, Aug 26, 2012 at 9:00 PM, Will Fitch <willfi...@php.net> wrote: > >> > >> > Maybe the simplest solution is we have a minimum participation rate > before > >> > voting can be closed? > >> > > >> Though it make sense - it's a problem, because it'll delay and reject > some > >> useful features because of requirements issue. > > > > If it is useful it should have enough supporters, else it most likely > > isn't useful. While there should be an option to actively abstain from > > voting. > > I am not sure the usefulness of this option, but it is possible to add > a blank field ot any vote. > > If the idea is to say 'I do not care enough to vote yes or no' then > simply vote no as one obviously either did not the RFC or do not want > it. > > But this is off topic again in this thread, what's about creating a > separate one if you feel like we need to refine this process? > > Cheers, > -- > Pierre > > @pierrejoye | http://blog.thepimp.net | http://www.libgd.org >
