Hi!
On 10/22/11 2:36 AM, Nathan Nobbe wrote:
Hi,
Another old issue I'd like to rehash with the upcoming release around the
corner [1].
I patched 5.4 alpha2 for review [2].
I think better idea would be to add another API function
(zend_call_method_ex?), that implements arbitrary argument cou
On Sat Oct 22 10:25 AM, Anthony Ferrara wrote:
> Well, I have a few opinions on this that I think are worth sharing:
>
> 1. If this change is made, we no longer would have mixins, but would
> have regular multiple-inheritance (With all the "issues" associated
> with it). Note that I said mixins
On Sat, Oct 22, 2011 at 8:25 AM, Anthony Ferrara wrote:
> Well, I have a few opinions on this that I think are worth sharing:
>
Anthony, thanks for your reply.
1. If this change is made, we no longer would have mixins, but would
> have regular multiple-inheritance (With all the "issues" associat
Am 22.10.2011 17:36, schrieb Lester Caine:
> Johannes Schlüter wrote:
There is also a lot to be said for going with what is known to be stable
for
> > an LTS release.
>>> >
>>> > Please do not begin with this discussion again. It is confusing for
>>> > the readers and totally
Johannes Schlüter wrote:
There is also a lot to be said for going with what is known to be stable for
> > an LTS release.
>
> Please do not begin with this discussion again. It is confusing for
> the readers and totally unrelated. There is no LTS in the release
> process RFC but every relea
2011/10/22 Johannes Schlüter :
>> > There is also a lot to be said for going with what is known to be stable
>> > for
>> > an LTS release.
>> Please do not begin with this discussion again. It is confusing for
>> the readers and totally unrelated. There is no LTS in the release
>> process RFC but
On Sat, 2011-10-22 at 16:39 +0200, Pierre Joye wrote:
> hi,
>
> On Sat, Oct 22, 2011 at 4:28 PM, Lester Caine wrote:
> >
> > There is also a lot to be said for going with what is known to be stable for
> > an LTS release.
>
> Please do not begin with this discussion again. It is confusing for
>
hi,
On Sat, Oct 22, 2011 at 4:28 PM, Lester Caine wrote:
>
> There is also a lot to be said for going with what is known to be stable for
> an LTS release.
Please do not begin with this discussion again. It is confusing for
the readers and totally unrelated. There is no LTS in the release
proces
Pierre Joye wrote:
On Sat, Oct 22, 2011 at 1:03 PM, Hannes Magnusson
wrote:
On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 22:52, Clint Byrum wrote:
Hi everyone. I'm trying to plan things for Ubuntu's upcoming 12.04 LTS
release. LTS stands for Long Term Support, and it will be supported by
Canonical for 5 years. B
Well, I have a few opinions on this that I think are worth sharing:
1. If this change is made, we no longer would have mixins, but would
have regular multiple-inheritance (With all the "issues" associated
with it). Note that I said mixins and not traits. That's because
since these were implement
On Sat, Oct 22, 2011 at 1:03 PM, Hannes Magnusson
wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 22:52, Clint Byrum wrote:
>> Hi everyone. I'm trying to plan things for Ubuntu's upcoming 12.04 LTS
>> release. LTS stands for Long Term Support, and it will be supported by
>> Canonical for 5 years. Because of thi
On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 22:52, Clint Byrum wrote:
> Hi everyone. I'm trying to plan things for Ubuntu's upcoming 12.04 LTS
> release. LTS stands for Long Term Support, and it will be supported by
> Canonical for 5 years. Because of this, I really want to ship a version
Wouldn't you rather want to
Hi,
Another old issue I'd like to rehash with the upcoming release around the
corner [1].
I patched 5.4 alpha2 for review [2].
Seems like the most appropriate time for a patch of this nature is during a
major release, per the previous conversation.
According to Marcus the patch is reasonable:
Hi folks,
With a 5.4 release right around the corner I'd like a moment of your time to
reconsider this issue [1].
I've read through the original conversation [2] and would summarize the
points as follows:
. several folks see value in the feature
. the feature would not be an impedance for people
14 matches
Mail list logo