Matt W wrote:
Hi Andrei,
I see you applied my patch.
Testing with a php5.2-200607222030 snaps having
/* $Id: array.c,v 1.308.2.21.2.7 2006/07/22 16:58:39 andrei Exp $ */
Looks by me as the ext/standard/tests/array/array_combine.phpt fails
Is it by me ?
$ diff -W 60 -y --suppress-common-lines
Matt W wrote:
Hi,
Give some basic userland examples about what you propose to change,
please ...
(I guess these are a part of the .phpt)
In the .phpt file, it is userland code where you can see examples of how the
changes work. :-)
Sure, but I was meaning , in so far you extend the functionali
I reviewed the code and as far as I can tell it works fine.
Certainly, some sort of an earlier courtesy notice to the RM would've
been nice, but as Rasmus said this is till before RC1, so do I don't
see a problem with the patch's inclusion. That said, if it becomes
apparent that the code do
On Jul 23, 2006, at 5:38 AM, Matt W wrote:
While we're on the subject, one of my favorite personal patches to
PHP is one that adds the %n specifier. The parameter to %n is a
reference which recieves the total length of the string with all
replacements so far. %n itself is replaced by nothing at a
Fixed. Thanks!
--Jani
On Sun, 23 Jul 2006, Stut wrote:
I've just started developing a new extension, checked out the latest
source and found this snafu. I assume it's a typo.
-Stut
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/un
I've just started developing a new extension, checked out the latest
source and found this snafu. I assume it's a typo.
-Stut
Index: phpize.in
===
RCS file: /repository/php-src/scripts/phpize.in,v
retrieving revision 1.32
diff -u -u -
Most compiler (I know gcc and Visual C do) will optimize strlen
("static_string").
On 21-Jul-06, at 9:04 AM, Matt W wrote:
Hi Richard,
I think I've seen those instances that you're referring to. By
fixed length
string I assume you mean hard-coded "string_key". Yeah, I would
think thos
Hello,
On 7/23/06, Marcus Boerger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hello Stefan,
Sunday, July 23, 2006, 3:39:35 AM, you wrote:
>> If you'd be grown up yourself, you would just commit to HEAD instead
>> of spending time on meaningless insults.
> Commiting to HEAD is not possible. How often do I have
Marcus Boerger wrote:
Hello Stefan,
Sunday, July 23, 2006, 3:39:35 AM, you wrote:
If you'd be grown up yourself, you would just commit to HEAD instead
of spending time on meaningless insults.
Commiting to HEAD is not possible. How often do I have to tell that.
Because of the unicode changes t
Hello Stefan,
Sunday, July 23, 2006, 3:39:35 AM, you wrote:
>> If you'd be grown up yourself, you would just commit to HEAD instead
>> of spending time on meaningless insults.
> Commiting to HEAD is not possible. How often do I have to tell that.
> Because of the unicode changes the patch has to
I agree; this upload patch should be reverted.
--Wez.
On 7/23/06, Derick Rethans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Sun, 23 Jul 2006, Stefan Esser wrote:
> Antony,
> > So this is the reason you think you can break the upcoming release now?
> > Please revert it, as I don't want to see yet another br
Hi,
so it seems to me like several core developers think its a worthwhile
addition to core if the class is renamed to ZipArchive (if I understood
Pierre correctly in a private IRC exchange he is ok with renaming the
class).
The idea of a PDO for archives does not seem to generate much suppor
I think its important to understand why shared hosts dont like PECL.
Some of the main reasons IME is that they
1. Dont know the author of the package
2. Dont trust the package to be secure
3. Dont know if the package will have a knock of effect on server stability.
They know the core package an
On Sun, 23 Jul 2006, Stefan Esser wrote:
> Antony,
> > So this is the reason you think you can break the upcoming release now?
> > Please revert it, as I don't want to see yet another broken release
> > just because you decided you can do what you want.
> Instead of bothering me with your opinion
Hi Stefan,
I will put rfc1867 updating on my PHP6 todo list so in case it somehow
is forgotten I can try to remind you.
As for PHP 5.2 the key question is if you deem this production ready and
also if Ilia thinks its still in time to add this. From the words you
used I think it sounded a lot
On 7/23/06, Michael Wallner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Stefan Esser wrote:
> Antony,
>
> grow up.
>
> Stefan
If you'd be grown up yourself, you would just commit to HEAD instead of
spending time on meaningless insults.
Mikael, besides the (now common) bad words, I see no problem with
working
> If you'd be grown up yourself, you would just commit to HEAD instead
> of spending time on meaningless insults.
Commiting to HEAD is not possible. How often do I have to tell that.
Because of the unicode changes the patch has to be majorly rewritten.
Additionally it is simply impossible to commi
Hi,
- Original Message -
From: "bertrand Gugger"
Sent: Saturday, July 22, 2006
> Bonsoir Matt,
> Matt W wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Haven't heard any opinions on these functionality changes... (Though I
know
> > more significant things keep you busy!)
> >
> > Do many other people use number_
Hi Gwynne,
- Original Message -
From: "Gwynne"
Sent: Saturday, July 22, 2006
> On Jul 20, 2006, at 3:21 PM, Marcus Boerger wrote:
> >> I've wished there was a *printf() float specifier that wouldn't
> >> include
> >> trailing zeros/point, as simply converting to string (echo, %s,
> >> e
Stefan Esser wrote:
Antony,
grow up.
Stefan
If you'd be grown up yourself, you would just commit to HEAD instead of
spending time on meaningless insults.
--
Michael
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Antony,
grow up.
Stefan
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Hi Richard, Andrei,
Hold on about a patch to optimize add_assoc_* and hard-coded keys. I just
finished some testing to see what difference it makes: none! :-) Compilers
must optimize strlen("static string") to the literal value; at least VC++
Express does. Using a dynamic string from estrdup(),
On 23.07.2006 11:16, Stefan Esser wrote:
Antony,
So this is the reason you think you can break the upcoming release now?
Please revert it, as I don't want to see yet another broken release
just because you decided you can do what you want.
Instead of bothering me with your opinion
Please stop
Antony,
> So this is the reason you think you can break the upcoming release now?
> Please revert it, as I don't want to see yet another broken release
> just because you decided you can do what you want.
Instead of bothering me with your opinion have a look at my code and
tell me where it is broke
24 matches
Mail list logo
