On Sat, 1 Oct 2005 20:08:51 +0200
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Marcus Boerger) wrote:
> Hello Greg,
>
> this only hides the syntoms but doesn't fix anything
Hi Marcus,
I think it's enough now.
It is not possible to fix what you consider as the cause. You do not
like it, use --disable-pear. Seriously,
I thought it was only me and Zeev that didn't like it :)
So can we make a policy over this and write it in stone somewhere?
Or do we have to write it in water?
ps your new 'limited period' sig is rather wonderful...
- Original Message -
From: "Jani Taskinen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "St
This has NOT been the policy. The person who came up with
this stupid idea should be punis..informed about it.
There's this nice download-server running thttpd (IIRC)
somewhere where the RCs and such USED to be put.
(dejavu or did I actually mention about this earlier? :)
Hi,
on a related note on the .phar stuff: I've just built PHP without zlib support
and the PEAR install failed with
| Installing PEAR environment: /opt/php-5.1-dev/lib/php/
|
| Notice: Error: zlib extension is not enabled - gzinflate() function needed
| for compressed .phars in /.../PHP_5
Guys,
You don't need to read the whole of the history below, but doing so might
help to illustrate some of the confusion caused by distributing PHP release
candidates and extension packs on the php.net downloads page alongside the
official PHP releases.
Can we re-think this policy, please?
My ow
On 10/1/05, Marcus Boerger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello Christian,
>
> Saturday, October 1, 2005, 6:13:51 PM, you wrote:
>
> > Helgi Þormar wrote:
> >> So in a way I agree with Jani, specially since many distros are already
> >> moving to 5.x
>
> > Maybe you should look at the installed bases
Hello Christian,
Saturday, October 1, 2005, 6:13:51 PM, you wrote:
> Helgi Þormar wrote:
>> So in a way I agree with Jani, specially since many distros are already
>> moving to 5.x
> Maybe you should look at the installed bases of PHP instead of the PHP
> version distributed with the latest dis
Helgi Þormar wrote:
So in a way I agree with Jani, specially since many distros are already
moving to 5.x
Maybe you should look at the installed bases of PHP instead of the PHP
version distributed with the latest distros. Anyone got current stats on
that?
And no, I don't believe in forcing
Derick Rethans wrote:
> On Sat, 1 Oct 2005, Greg Beaver wrote:
>
>
>>It appears that E_STRICT is being triggered even though it is explicitly
>>NOT asked for. All the same, I added another redundant
>>error_reporting() call at the top of install-pear.php, re-built the
>>.phar and committed to pe
On Sat, 01 Oct 2005 08:21:57 -0700, Greg Beaver wrote:
> Until all the standard unix
> distros (gentoo/redhat/debian/etc.) start distributing PHP 5.x as the
> standard PHP version, this isn't an option.
Just so you know, Fedora and FreeBSD have had 5.x as standard for some
time now ;-) I can't sp
On Sat, 1 Oct 2005, Greg Beaver wrote:
> It appears that E_STRICT is being triggered even though it is explicitly
> NOT asked for. All the same, I added another redundant
> error_reporting() call at the top of install-pear.php, re-built the
> .phar and committed to pearweb. Hopefully this will f
Hello Pierre,
Saturday, October 1, 2005, 5:04:01 PM, you wrote:
> On Sat, 1 Oct 2005 16:48:47 +0200
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Marcus Boerger) wrote:
>> Hello Pierre,
>>
>> Saturday, October 1, 2005, 4:24:02 PM, you wrote:
>>
>> > On Sat, 1 Oct 2005 16:17:19 +0200 (CEST)
>> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Deri
On Sat, 1 Oct 2005, Pierre wrote:
We have to modify it as the underlying code is not php5 _only_ but have
to work for both php5 and php4.
You haven't heard about branches either? :)
--Jani
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.n
On Sat, 1 Oct 2005, Greg Beaver wrote:
support entirely from the pear command. Until all the standard unix
distros (gentoo/redhat/debian/etc.) start distributing PHP 5.x as the
standard PHP version, this isn't an option.
And as long as you keep it backwards-compatible, they won't upgrade.
Derick Rethans wrote:
> Hello!
>
> I am wondering why "make install-pear" comes up with hundreds of
> e_strict warnings? The code tests for PHP 5.1 but makes use of all old
> things that are now considered e_strict or deprecated. Besides this for
> some reason setting error_reporting to 0 doesn
On Sat, 1 Oct 2005 16:48:47 +0200
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Marcus Boerger) wrote:
> Hello Pierre,
>
> Saturday, October 1, 2005, 4:24:02 PM, you wrote:
>
> > On Sat, 1 Oct 2005 16:17:19 +0200 (CEST)
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Derick Rethans) wrote:
>
>
> >> 1. not modify any error reporting setting
>
Hello Pierre,
Saturday, October 1, 2005, 4:24:02 PM, you wrote:
> On Sat, 1 Oct 2005 16:17:19 +0200 (CEST)
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Derick Rethans) wrote:
>> 1. not modify any error reporting setting
> We have to modify it as the underlying code is not php5 _only_ but have
> to work for both php5
On Sat, 1 Oct 2005 16:17:19 +0200 (CEST)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Derick Rethans) wrote:
> But it seems E_STRICT is turned on later for some reason too. Can
> this code please be upgraded to 1. not modify any error reporting
> setting and 2. PHP 5.1 compatible code. Currently installing pear
> does no
On Sat, 1 Oct 2005 16:17:19 +0200 (CEST)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Derick Rethans) wrote:
> 1. not modify any error reporting setting
We have to modify it as the underlying code is not php5 _only_ but have
to work for both php5 and php4.
> 2. PHP 5.1 compatible code.
It is compatible, or do you mean
Hello!
I am wondering why "make install-pear" comes up with hundreds of
e_strict warnings? The code tests for PHP 5.1 but makes use of all old
things that are now considered e_strict or deprecated. Besides this for
some reason setting error_reporting to 0 doesn't help at all. First of
all the
> [3] string addcslashes(string text, string charlist)
> [4] string stripcslashes(string text)
> Escape chars < 32 or > 126 with octal sequences, and escape
> characters from charlist with backspace.
Escaping chars/codepts with values > 126 is a pblm in Unicode
strings. Using the 3-digit octal esc
21 matches
Mail list logo
