seems sqlite.w32.h did not get updated when sqlite was last updated, so
you cannot build a clean php5 on win32. The culprit is the
SQLITE_NOTADB define. hacking it in at least lets me build...this is on
a newly installed xp pro box, where I have only compiled 4.3.x so far.
Shane
--
PHP Intern
Sara Golemon wrote:
"Robert Janeczek" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I'm still experiencing the bug: http://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=28829
(Crashes when BC Math functions get an argument of 0) with this
release. I have no problems duplicating it and should be around
Hi Toby,
Tobias Schlitt wrote:
> So, please do all those poor souls a big favor and reintegrate the GIF
> creation support back into an actual PHP version (4.3.9 / 5.1.0??).
check the archives. This was discuessed just some days ago and if I remeber
right Gif will be in the next versions (4.3.9 a
"Robert Janeczek" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > I'm still experiencing the bug: http://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=28829
> > (Crashes when BC Math functions get an argument of 0) with this
> > release. I have no problems duplicating it and should be around for a
> >
It just comes out of the oven, WAMP5 1.0 now includes PHP 5.0.0 released a
few hours ago.
This new version installs PHP 5.0.0, apache 1.3.31, MySQL 4.0.18, a service
manager as a tray icon...on your Windows system :
http://www.en.wampserver.com (english)
http://www.wampserver.com (français)
Tha
Sorry, it's late here...
website that really works in every browser the same, you cannot count on
GIF, since some more actual browsers still do not support PNG
s/GIF/PNG/
--
Tobias Schlitt GPG Key: 0xA6529579
a passion for phphttp://ww
Hi all!
I definitly know, that GIF is an outdated and today a bit crappy
graphics format and that PNG is much nicer and cooler. Myself would not
even use the GIF creation in PHP anymore and did not do for years.
But beside that I know, that there still are (huge) companies, which
force their em
The PHP development team is proud to announce the official release of PHP 5.
Some of the key features of PHP 5 include:
- The Zend Engine II with a new object model and dozens of new features.
- XML support has been completely redone in PHP 5, all extensions are now
focused around the excellent li
> There's no good online "here's how PHP's C internals work," but
> George's "Advanced PHP Programming" book is a good place to start
> reading.
nice. just asked someone to publish it in poland :)
rash
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php
> I'm still experiencing the bug: http://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=28829
> (Crashes when BC Math functions get an argument of 0) with this
> release. I have no problems duplicating it and should be around for a
> while if someone needs more information, or is unable to duplicate
> it.
yep, this b
On Tue, 13 Jul 2004, Daniel Crookston wrote:
> So, am I being lazy, have I missed some docs on the web regarding how to
> be useful, or how to become familiar enough with the PHP code to start
> lending a hand with the debugging? Or are we expected to learn it
> ourselves, on our own, in order to
I'm glad you spoke up first Chris, because I have questions in a similar
vein. Namely, how can I help? I have a few years of C under my belt, but
I never got to the point where I'd be comfy hacking PHP. (I'd like to get
there eventually, I'm just not there yet.)
So, am I being lazy, have I m
Edin Kadribasic wrote:
On Monday 12 July 2004 23:11, Andi Gutmans wrote:
Please download
and make sure there are no serious show stoppers.
Windows build from the CVS as of 6:00 GMT:
http://www.php.net/~edink/php-5.0.0-Win32-prerelease-test.zip
Edin
Hi, I'm new to the list, so forgive me if
Jesper Laursen wrote:
translating the php documentation into danish
Yup Yup, he's clean
// Tom - doc-da manager
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Hello Zeev,
The compination of the new CVS PHP version
and increasing the Stack for MOS works nice here.
Everything runs fast and smoth.
Many thanks
Gunnar
On Jul 11, 2004, at 10:32 AM, Zeev Suraski wrote:
Gunnar,
Did you try the latest CVS after Wez wrote his reply?
Zeev
At 16:52 10/07/2004, Gunna
Are you sure you don't have some stale build? I checked the same tests with
valgrind and I get nothing.
At 09:08 PM 7/13/2004 +0400, Antony Dovgal wrote:
On Tue, 13 Jul 2004 15:34:28 +0400
Antony Dovgal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi all!
>
> That's what valgrind says:
>
> 1)
> Zend/tests/bug261
> On Tue, 13 Jul 2004 09:28:10 -0700, Andi Gutmans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Yes, it definitely looks as if ht was freed previously.
> >
"Wez Furlong" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Probably fixed now in CVS; looks like Sara forgot to change this last
> thing as
Wez Furlong wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
True. Discussions about whether or not to use a templating system or
using comments for readability is off topic.
However I am trying to find out if there is a technical reason for not
including the alternative syntax for this control structure or any other
On Tue, 13 Jul 2004 08:59:22 -0700, Andi Gutmans wrote:
> Is this something Edin should fix or is it in php5/pear?
Everything should be fine, now, thanks to Edin.
I asked the pear-qa team to doublecheck,
just in case ;-)
Regards,
--
Lorenzo Alberton
http://pear.php.net/user/quipo
> At 12:09 PM
I've alredy fixed this.
Edin
- Original Message -
From: "Andi Gutmans" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Lorenzo Alberton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, July 13, 2004 5:59 PM
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] PHP 5.0.0 Test roll
> Is this something Edin sho
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tue, 13 Jul 2004 20:10:26 +0200, Ferdinand Beyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 13 Jul 2004 at 11:34, Marc Richards wrote:
>
> > It is, and that is what I currently do, but
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Is generally less readable
On 13 Jul 2004 at 11:34, Marc Richards wrote:
> It is, and that is what I currently do, but
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Is generally less readable (especially in a large page) than:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
If you want readability, try using comments!
In my cywgin build, the problem is fixed!
I'll later test a compiled snapshot.
Nuni
> Probably fixed now in CVS; looks like Sara forgot to change this last
> thing as part of her filter thread safety fix.
>
> --Wez.
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit
On Tue, 13 Jul 2004 15:34:28 +0400
Antony Dovgal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi all!
>
> That's what valgrind says:
>
> 1)
> Zend/tests/bug26166.phpt
>
> Zend/zend_execute.c:1352
> EX(Ts) = (temp_variable *) safe_emalloc(sizeof(temp_variable),
> op_array->T, 0);
>
> ==8511== 40 bytes i
King Wez!
At 12:50 PM 7/13/2004 -0400, Rob Richards wrote:
Yup both cli and apache 2 working fine for me now.
Thanks,
Rob
- Original Message -
From: Wez Furlong
> Probably fixed now in CVS; looks like Sara forgot to change this last
> thing as part of her filter thread safety fix.
>
> --We
Yup both cli and apache 2 working fine for me now.
Thanks,
Rob
- Original Message -
From: Wez Furlong
> Probably fixed now in CVS; looks like Sara forgot to change this last
> thing as part of her filter thread safety fix.
>
> --Wez.
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mail
> LOL. I sure as hell don't know what color to paint a nuclear power plant.
>
flourescent green ?
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Probably fixed now in CVS; looks like Sara forgot to change this last
thing as part of her filter thread safety fix.
--Wez.
On Tue, 13 Jul 2004 09:28:10 -0700, Andi Gutmans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Yes, it definitely looks as if ht was freed previously.
>
> At 12:23 PM 7/13/2004 -0400, [EMAI
> Windows build from the CVS as of 6:00 GMT:
>
> http://www.php.net/~edink/php-5.0.0-Win32-prerelease-test.zip
http://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=29025 is still present
rash
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Yes, it definitely looks as if ht was freed previously.
At 12:23 PM 7/13/2004 -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
"Rob Richards" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> php5ts_debug.dll!_zend_is_inconsistent(_hashtable * ht=0xcdcdcdcd, char *
> file=0x1053aaf0, int line=510) Line 53 + 0x3 C
> php5ts_debug.dll!z
"Rob Richards" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> php5ts_debug.dll!_zend_is_inconsistent(_hashtable * ht=0xcdcdcdcd, char *
> file=0x1053aaf0, int line=510) Line 53 + 0x3 C
> php5ts_debug.dll!zend_hash_destroy(_hashtable * ht=0xcdcdcdcd) Line 510 +
> 0x19 C
> php5ts_debug.dll!php_shutdown_stream_wrap
Can you try and debug? I just can't get it to crash here :)
At 05:13 PM 7/13/2004 +0100, Nuno Lopes wrote:
> Are you sure you're not loading old extensions?
Completly sure! I've also tried to disable all extensions and it still
segfaults.
> At 12:39 PM 7/13/2004 +0100, Nuno Lopes wrote:
> > > > C
> Are you sure you're not loading old extensions?
Completly sure! I've also tried to disable all extensions and it still
segfaults.
> At 12:39 PM 7/13/2004 +0100, Nuno Lopes wrote:
> > > > Current HEAD still segfaults with "php -m" on Windows:
> > >
> > > this is not reproduceable with latest
Are you sure you're not loading old extensions?
At 12:39 PM 7/13/2004 +0100, Nuno Lopes wrote:
> > Current HEAD still segfaults with "php -m" on Windows:
>
> this is not reproduceable with latest snapshotbuild on Windows XP.
>
> Stefan
Using php5-win32-200407131030.zip, PHP still segfaults on my p
Is this something Edin should fix or is it in php5/pear?
At 12:09 PM 7/13/2004 +0200, Lorenzo Alberton wrote:
> On Monday 12 July 2004 23:11, Andi Gutmans wrote:
>> I did a test roll of PHP 5.0.0 (without version change).
>> Please download and make sure there are no serious
>> show stoppers.
>
> W
> Can someone reproduce this? I couldn't. Not in debug nor in release.
I can!
http://news.php.net/php.internals/11163
> At 12:59 PM 7/13/2004 +0200, Sebastian Bergmann wrote:
> >Andi Gutmans wrote:
> >>If all goes well, I'll do version changes and will roll the release
> >>within about 24 hour
I can repeatedly reproduce this with cli (php -m) and apache2 (just starting
and stopping it) apache 2 crash probably same as bug 29025 - though with or
without xsl doesnt matter). cgi seems to be fine. Always same stack trace.
php5ts_debug.dll!_zend_is_inconsistent(_hashtable * ht=0xcdcdcdcd, cha
I tried pre-release-test package on "php -m" : Does not segfault at home
with standard conf.
So I tried activating all extensions. I had a lot of dependencies Warnings
(normal) but no segfault...
> Can someone reproduce this? I couldn't. Not in debug nor in release.
>
> At 12:59 PM 7/13/2004 +020
Adam Maccabee Trachtenberg wrote:
On Mon, 12 Jul 2004, John Coggeshall wrote:
Not to bust everyone's bubble here, but frankly what is the point of a
90-100+ thread on this? I mean can't this just be implemented as a PHP
function without all this discussion?
Maybe we should name the function bike
Red Wingate wrote:
Marc Richards wrote:
I guess this is too late for 5.0, and I feel like there is bound to be
opposition, but this has been bugging me for a while, so I figured I
would ask.
I use the alternative syntax for control structures almost exclusively
within my HTML code but I have to r
Can someone reproduce this? I couldn't. Not in debug nor in release.
At 12:59 PM 7/13/2004 +0200, Sebastian Bergmann wrote:
Andi Gutmans wrote:
If all goes well, I'll do version changes and will roll the release
within about 24 hours.
Current HEAD still segfaults with "php -m" on Windows:
http
Thomas Seifert wrote:
On Mon, 12 Jul 2004 21:53:51 -0400, Marc Richards wrote:
This looks like a good case to use a real template-engine.
Huh? Why would you use a template engine if the features you are
looking for already exist in the language. You think I should use a
temp
+1 ;)
On Mon, 12 Jul 2004 22:44:00 -0400 (EDT), Adam Maccabee Trachtenberg
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, 12 Jul 2004, John Coggeshall wrote:
>
> > Not to bust everyone's bubble here, but frankly what is the point of a
> > 90-100+ thread on this? I mean can't this just be implemented as a P
On Tue, 13 Jul 2004 17:16:37 +0200
Martin Jansen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Attached is a patch that fixes a typo in the test case
> tests/lang/038.phpt.
Stefan has already fixed it:
http://cvs.php.net/diff.php/php-src/tests/lang/038.phpt?r1=1.2&r2=1.3&ty=u
---
WBR,
Antony Dovgal aka tony2001
Attached is a patch that fixes a typo in the test case
tests/lang/038.phpt.
--
- Martin Martin Jansen
http://martinjansen.com/
Index: tests/lang/038.phpt
===
RCS file: /reposi
Okay. Tag wise it's RC4 because I couldn't come up with something better
and didn't want to screw up the CVS tag names.
At 10:00 AM 7/13/2004 +0200, Derick Rethans wrote:
On Mon, 12 Jul 2004, Andi Gutmans wrote:
> I did a test roll of PHP 5.0.0 (without version change). Please download
> and make
Ahh I had that yesterday, but only when a particular extension was built-in.
So I blamed the extension.. What's your configure line?
> -Original Message-
> From: news [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Sebastian Bergmann
> Sent: 13 July 2004 12:00
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [
ignore
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Some more:
php-src/ext/soap/tests/server014.phpt:
==10122== Invalid read of size 4
==10122==at 0x8230D88: _zval_ptr_dtor (zend_execute_API.c:389)
==10122==by 0x823D45E: _zval_ptr_dtor_wrapper (zend_variables.c:193)
==10122==by 0x8247C41: zend_hash_destroy (zend_hash.c:519)
==10122==
Marc Richards wrote:
> I guess this is too late for 5.0, and I feel like there is bound to be
> opposition, but this has been bugging me for a while, so I figured I
> would ask.
>
> I use the alternative syntax for control structures almost exclusively
> within my HTML code but I have to revert t
Ok,
sorry, had an old php.ini in my windows directory. After deleting it,
everything works fine, not segfault, no warning!
Thanks ;-)
"Derick Rethans" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit dans le message de news:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tue, 13 Jul 2004, romain bourdon wrote:
> "Sebastian Bergmann" <[EMAI
On Tue, 13 Jul 2004, romain bourdon wrote:
> "Sebastian Bergmann" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit dans le message de
> news:
> > Current HEAD still segfaults with "php -m" on Windows:
> >
> > http://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=29088
>
> Hi,
> i've tried php -m on my windows with the prerelease-test
"Sebastian Bergmann" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit dans le message de
news:
> Current HEAD still segfaults with "php -m" on Windows:
>
> http://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=29088
Hi,
i've tried php -m on my windows with the prerelease-test version, it doesn'
t segfault but there are some warning me
> > Current HEAD still segfaults with "php -m" on Windows:
>
> this is not reproduceable with latest snapshotbuild on Windows XP.
>
> Stefan
Using php5-win32-200407131030.zip, PHP still segfaults on my pc:
Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
0x1003e2fd in zend_hash_destroy () f
Hi all!
That's what valgrind says:
1)
Zend/tests/bug26166.phpt
Zend/zend_execute.c:1352
EX(Ts) = (temp_variable *) safe_emalloc(sizeof(temp_variable),
op_array->T, 0);
==8511== 40 bytes in 1 blocks are still reachable in loss record 2 of 7
==8511==at 0x3C01E375: malloc (vg_replace_
Hi,
Current HEAD still segfaults with "php -m" on Windows:
this is not reproduceable with latest snapshotbuild on Windows XP.
Stefan
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
On Tuesday 13 July 2004 12:09, Lorenzo Alberton wrote:
> the pear packages bundled in the win32 snaps are STALE!!
You're welcome to send me a .zip with the correct content of the pear bundle
that's supposed to be packaged in windows distro.
Edin
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Maili
Andi Gutmans wrote:
If all goes well, I'll do version changes and will roll the release
within about 24 hours.
Current HEAD still segfaults with "php -m" on Windows:
http://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=29088
--
Sebastian Bergmann
http://sebastian-bergmann.de/ http://phpOpenTracker
> On Monday 12 July 2004 23:11, Andi Gutmans wrote:
>> I did a test roll of PHP 5.0.0 (without version change).
>> Please download and make sure there are no serious
>> show stoppers.
>
> Windows build from the CVS as of 6:00 GMT:
> http://www.php.net/~edink/php-5.0.0-Win32-prerelease-test.zip
> Ed
CVS is ok. looks like it got fixed after Andi made the tarball.
Regards
Alan
Derick Rethans wrote:
On Tue, 13 Jul 2004, Derick Rethans wrote:
I think there is still something borked with streams, as the following
test case shows major corruption (mostly the second half of the mail):
Alan was so k
On Monday 12 July 2004 23:11, Andi Gutmans wrote:
> I did a test roll of PHP 5.0.0 (without version change). Please download
> and make sure there are no serious show stoppers. You can grab it at
> http://snaps.php.net/~andi/
> Edin, it might be a good idea for you to roll a test package too.
> If
On Mon, 12 Jul 2004, Andi Gutmans wrote:
> I did a test roll of PHP 5.0.0 (without version change). Please download
> and make sure there are no serious show stoppers. You can grab it at
> http://snaps.php.net/~andi/
I moved those to http://www.php.net/~andi/ and renamed them from RC4
(which it i
On Tue, 13 Jul 2004, Derick Rethans wrote:
> I think there is still something borked with streams, as the following
> test case shows major corruption (mostly the second half of the mail):
Alan was so kind of making a valgrind trace of it:
http://docs.akbkhome.com/php5.valgrind.txt
regards,
Deri
On Mon, 12 Jul 2004 21:53:51 -0400, Marc Richards wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
This looks like a good case to use a real template-engine.
thomas
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Hello,
I think there is still something borked with streams, as the following
test case shows major corruption (mostly the second half of the mail):
-- Forwarded message --
Date: Tue, 13 Jul 2004 09:35:55 +0200
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [PHP-QA] Test
On Tue, 13 Jul 2004 09:12:19 +0200 (CEST)
Derick Rethans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, 12 Jul 2004, George Schlossnagle wrote:
>
> > what was wrong with nvl() (of oracle fame)?
>
> Nobody else but oracle people have any idea what they expect when they
> see nvl().
Agree.
Moreover, it's t
On Mon, 12 Jul 2004, George Schlossnagle wrote:
> what was wrong with nvl() (of oracle fame)?
Nobody else but oracle people have any idea what they expect when they
see nvl().
Derick
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
67 matches
Mail list logo
