On Tue, 13 Jul 2004 09:12:19 +0200 (CEST) Derick Rethans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, 12 Jul 2004, George Schlossnagle wrote: > > > what was wrong with nvl() (of oracle fame)? > > Nobody else but oracle people have any idea what they expect when they > see nvl(). Agree. Moreover, it's too obscure to understand. I vote for default() or default_value(). (Actually I vote against such construct at all, but it seems that nobody listens to such votes). --- WBR, Antony Dovgal aka tony2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] || [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
