Andi Gutmans wrote:
> now the build complains about missing iconv.h
iconv is a libxml2 dependency :)
--
Sebastian Bergmann
http://sebastian-bergmann.de/ http://phpOpenTracker.de/
http://www.professionelle-softwareentwicklung-mit-php5.de/
--
PHP Internals - PHP R
From: Andi Gutmans
> So can someone tell me where the build stands, what the instructions are
> and how we can get rid of the need of using a patched version of libxml2?
On windows, you really dont need that giant patch.
Currently it does need xmlInitThreads in the libxml2.def.src/libxml2.def
(d
[snip]
I use redhat 9 and 5.0, be sure to configure
--with-kerberos=/usr/kerberos
Kevin
I just tried this after doing a cvsclean and ./buildconf and ./configure
same problem. My configure line is
As far as I know, --with-kerberos does not have any effect if you do not
compile PHP with imap
Hey,
I can't get Win32 to build anymore. Sebastian sent me some patched libxml2
include files and now the build complains about missing iconv.h and not
about the missing libxml2 includes anymore.
We need to get this whole build going again in a pretty straightforward
manner. I understand that t
On 13 Jun 15:29, walt boring wrote:
> I was curious if it is possible to have an include work inside of a
> namespace for php5
PHP5 does not provide namespaces (anymore).
regards dtg
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Howdy,
I was curious if it is possible to have an include work inside of a
namespace for php5, and have classes/functions/defines
that are declared in the included file become part of the namespace?
This is usefull for large library projects, where it would
be combersome for obvious reasons to
Kevin Waterson wrote:
This one time, at band camp, walt boring <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I am trying to compile the latest PHP5 from CVS w/ openssl support, and
it bails looking for krb.h. I have
a RedHat9 box. Below is the output. I have this same issue with
compiling php 4.3.2. I usua
On Fri, 13 Jun 2003, Travis Miller wrote:
> First let me say hello, and I hope I am on the correct list for posting
> this kinda of stuff.
Please file a bug at bugs.php.net, and don't forget to include a
backtrace (instructions can be found on the bug reporting page).
regards,
Derick
--
"Int
First let me say hello, and I hope I am on the correct list for posting
this kinda of stuff.
I seeing apache segfaults using apache 1.3.27, php 4.3.2, and mysql
3.23.56 while using mysql_info() inside of a class. Something like this:
function MySQL($host, $user, $pass, $db){
$this->conn
On Sunday 08 June 2003 18:23, Rasmus Lerdorf wrote:
> The one point on the QA issue is that nobody ever looks through all the
> PECL extensions, but we occasionally grep through all the ext/* extensions
> to make sure that an API change, or just a simple mistake that we found
> does not occur in ot
Didn't you get my email? I fixed the bug, as far as I know. Try the
latest PHP_4 or PHP_4_3 CVS.
On Fri, 13 Jun 2003, Wei He wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I didn't receive and emails regarding to my discovery of the bug. If it
> wasn't because the mailing list or my email server's problem, it would
> turned
Hi,
this is a general reply to what seems to be a theme in this thread. Here
are my observations and comments.
It seems to me that a lot of comment from php-dev people is mostly
concerned about getting control over PECL. I generally agree that
php-dev people have more to do with maintaining the c
On Monday 09 June 2003 14:10, John Coggeshall wrote:
Hello John,
> I was playing around with mysqli and was quite annoyed having to have
> both the mysqli and mysql extensions installed in order to have my old
> PHP4 scripts working under PHP5.. As one solution, I put together a
> script[*] which
Hi,
I didn't receive and emails regarding to my discovery of the bug. If it
wasn't because the mailing list or my email server's problem, it would
turned out to be that nobody cares about it.
Then what if, according to my own debugging, the problem is related
to zend hash?
I guess the answer t
Ok, lets give it a shot.
I am trying to get some of the new domxml stuff to happen
with tragic results.
// no problem here..
$xmldoc = domxml_new_xmldoc('1.0');
I used to use add_root() but this would seem to have been replaced by
domxml_doc_add_root() which takes two arguements, are they like .
On Fri, 2003-06-13 at 10:36, Kevin Waterson wrote:
> Is this appropriate for asking about devel extensions such
> as domxml?
I think so ;)
But be aware, domxml will be deprecated with php5 (it will still work
with php5, but it will not be supported and enhanced anymore)
If you want to develop ne
Is this appropriate for asking about devel extensions such
as domxml?
Kind regards
Kevin
--
__
(_ \
_) )
| / / _ ) / _ | / ___) / _ )
| | ( (/ / ( ( | |( (___ ( (/ /
|_| \___
I want to expert in PHP
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
18 matches
Mail list logo
