Re: [Intel-gfx] [ANNOUNCE] xf86-video-intel 2.11.901

2010-06-15 Thread Julien Cristau
On Mon, Jun 14, 2010 at 17:39:54 -0700, Carl Worth wrote: > New requirements compared to 2.10 > - > * Libdrm >= 2.4.19 > The requirement is actually 2.4.21, afaict. Cheers, Julien signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: [Intel-gfx] [ANNOUNCE] xf86-video-intel 2.11.901

2010-06-15 Thread Julien Cristau
On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 16:05:15 +0200, Marc Deop i Argemí wrote: > On Tuesday June 15 2010 02:39:54 Carl Worth wrote: > > This is the first release candidate in preparation for the upcoming > > 2.12.0 release. We will appreciate any feedback we can get from > > testing of this snapshot to improve

Re: [Intel-gfx] [ANNOUNCE] xf86-video-intel 2.11.901

2010-06-15 Thread Julien Cristau
On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 09:46:19 -0700, Carl Worth wrote: > On Tue, 15 Jun 2010 10:18:17 +0100, Julien Cristau > wrote: > > On Mon, Jun 14, 2010 at 17:39:54 -0700, Carl Worth wrote: > > > > > New requirements compared to 2.10 > > > ---

Re: [Intel-gfx] [ANNOUNCE] xf86-video-intel 2.11.901

2010-06-15 Thread Julien Cristau
On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 18:16:23 +0100, Sergio Monteiro Basto wrote: > On Tue, 2010-06-15 at 10:18 +0100, Julien Cristau wrote: > > On Mon, Jun 14, 2010 at 17:39:54 -0700, Carl Worth wrote: > > > > > New requirements compared to 2.10 > > >

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] load_cursor_argb is supposed to return a Bool, not void

2014-04-14 Thread Julien Cristau
On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 11:22:03 -0700, Keith Packard wrote: > By mis-declaring this function, we ended up using software cursors > because the value seen by the caller was 0. > > Signed-off-by: Keith Packard > --- > src/sna/sna_display.c | 8 ++-- > src/sna/sna_display_fake.c | 3 ++-

Re: [Intel-gfx] compilation broken again

2013-11-12 Thread Julien Cristau
On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 22:31:03 +0100, Knut Petersen wrote: > is broken again: > > In file included from sna_accel.c:51:0: > /home/knut/fast/xorg/X11-h/usr/include/xorg/shmint.h:59:31: fatal error: > protocol-versions.h: No such file or directory > compilation terminated. > make[4]: *** [sna_a

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] overlay: fix link error due to missing -lrt

2013-09-16 Thread Julien Cristau
On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 15:48:18 -0300, Rodrigo Vivi wrote: > CC: Damien Lespiau > Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi > --- > overlay/Makefile.am | 2 ++ > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/overlay/Makefile.am b/overlay/Makefile.am > index 426a3df..c648875 100644 > --- a/overlay/Makefi

Re: [Intel-gfx] 3.11-rc7: i915: stuck on render ring

2013-10-07 Thread Julien Cristau
On Thu, Oct 3, 2013 at 22:42:06 +0200, Pavel Machek wrote: > On Wed 2013-09-04 11:08:14, Chris Wilson wrote: > > On Tue, Sep 03, 2013 at 09:06:47PM +0200, Pavel Machek wrote: > > > Hi! > > > > > > I was happily using X... and then screen froze. Mouse still > > > moves. Switching to text console

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/2] configure.ac: Do not include `x11-xcb`, `xcb-dri2` and `xcb-aux` in `XVMCLIB`

2013-02-04 Thread Julien Cristau
On Sun, Feb 3, 2013 at 13:29:04 +0100, Paul Menzel wrote: > I was surprised too that no error was generated. Do you have any idea > why compilations succeeds? > Fails to build here with ../../../src/xvmc/intel_xvmc.c:29:25: fatal error: xcb/xcb_aux.h: No such file or directory Also, shared libr

Re: [Intel-gfx] [3.2.y] drm/i915: add Ivy Bridge GT2 Server entries

2012-10-07 Thread Julien Cristau
On Mon, Oct 1, 2012 at 03:24:32 -0700, Jonathan Nieder wrote: > - without this patch, modern X errors out instead of starting, >because the intel driver requires kms. (In a hypothetical better >world, userspace would know to fall back to vesa or something.) > I'd expect X to start with

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 01/10] intel: shared header for shader debugging

2011-07-19 Thread Julien Cristau
On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 13:51:43 -0700, Ben Widawsky wrote: > +#define SHADER_DEBUG_SOCKET "/tmp/gen_debug" Not sure what this is used for, but does it really need to be in /tmp? Cheers, Julien ___ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 01/10] intel: shared header for shader debugging

2011-07-21 Thread Julien Cristau
On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 13:54:41 +, Ben Widawsky wrote: > On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 11:06:17PM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote: > > On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 13:51:43 -0700, Ben Widawsky wrote: > > > > > +#define SHADER_DEBUG_SOCKET "/tmp/gen_debug" > > >

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 01/10] intel: shared header for shader debugging

2011-07-27 Thread Julien Cristau
On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 15:08:08 +, Ben Widawsky wrote: > On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 11:22:12PM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote: > > On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 13:54:41 +, Ben Widawsky wrote: > > > > > On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 11:06:17PM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote: > &g

Re: [Intel-gfx] xf86-video-intel: 6 commits - configure.ac src/sna/gen5_render.c src/sna/Makefile.am src/sna/sna_accel.c src/sna/sna_driver.c src/sna/sna.h src/sna/sna_trapezoids.c

2011-09-12 Thread Julien Cristau
Hi Chris, On Fri, Sep 9, 2011 at 08:10:58 -0700, Chris Wilson wrote: > commit 2e1bf7e1b44db16d0c322f17535fc6a6fa07353b > Author: Chris Wilson > Date: Fri Sep 9 12:36:32 2011 +0100 > > sna: Record git-tree used for compilation > > Hopefully, I have all the dependencies correct fo

Re: [Intel-gfx] xf86-video-intel: 6 commits - configure.ac src/sna/gen5_render.c src/sna/Makefile.am src/sna/sna_accel.c src/sna/sna_driver.c src/sna/sna.h src/sna/sna_trapezoids.c

2011-09-15 Thread Julien Cristau
On Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 22:25:02 +0100, Chris Wilson wrote: > On Mon, 12 Sep 2011 23:12:19 +0200, Julien Cristau > wrote: > > Can I please get a way to opt out of this? I build from a git tree, but > > my .git isn't really something I want to put in my (or othe

Re: [Intel-gfx] glxinfo / glxgears segfault again

2011-09-17 Thread Julien Cristau
On Sat, Sep 17, 2011 at 14:14:39 +0200, Knut Petersen wrote: > OpenGL renderer string: Gallium 0.4 on i915 (chipset: 915GM) you likely don't want to be using that. Use the supported classic i915 driver instead. Cheers, Julien ___ Intel-gfx mailing lis

Re: [Intel-gfx] i915 module does not find 82865G if configured as secondary

2011-10-10 Thread Julien Cristau
On Sun, Oct 9, 2011 at 19:36:27 +0100, Chris Wilson wrote: > On Sun, 9 Oct 2011 14:44:30 +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote: > > On Sun, Oct 09, 2011 at 01:07:25PM +0200, Tempura San wrote: > > > Here is the output of lspci -nn: > > > > > > 00:00.0 Host bridge [0600]: Intel Corporation 82865G/PE/P DRAM

Re: [Intel-gfx] [ANNOUNCE] xf86-video-intel 2.16.901

2011-10-31 Thread Julien Cristau
On Mon, Oct 31, 2011 at 12:15:45 +1100, Bojan Smojver wrote: > On Sun, 2011-10-30 at 16:57 +, Chris Wilson wrote: > > Bugs fixed in this snapshot (compared to 2.16.0) > > No hibernation memory corruption fix. Sniff, sniff... :-( > Pretty sure what you should be looking for is in the kernel,

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/dp: Add branch/sink OUI debugging

2012-01-14 Thread Julien Cristau
On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 13:26:08 -0500, Adam Jackson wrote: > DisplayPort lets you discover the manufacturer OUI of the other end. > This is good, because it means you might be able to have per-phy quirks > to work around other people's bugs, but it's bad because it removes some > incentive to not

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/2] intel: Add support for overriding the PCI ID via an environment variable

2012-03-03 Thread Julien Cristau
On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 21:11:07 +, Chris Wilson wrote: > On Tue, 21 Feb 2012 12:59:37 -0800, Kenneth Graunke > wrote: > > @@ -1828,6 +1829,9 @@ drm_intel_gem_bo_mrb_exec2(drm_intel_bo *bo, int used, > > execbuf.rsvd1 = 0; > > execbuf.rsvd2 = 0; > > > > + if (getenv("INTEL_DEVID_

Re: [Intel-gfx] funny lines in X applications and /dev/agpgart missing

2010-07-13 Thread Julien Cristau
On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 16:29:37 +1000, Huaxin Xu wrote: > Hi, > > My X windows application shows some funny lines after being launched. > > Please find kernel .config, Xorg.conf and Xorg.log in the attachments. > > Setup: Desktop, motherboard: GA-G41MT-ES2L (with G41 chipset), Monitor > SAMSUN

Re: [Intel-gfx] xf86-video-intel: configure.ac

2010-07-27 Thread Julien Cristau
On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 16:44:47 -0700, Jesse Barnes wrote: > configure.ac |2 ++ > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) > > New commits: > commit d580fa82a1cf339d2d1fd1055d137c0b23cd04f3 > Author: Jesse Barnes > Date: Mon Jul 26 16:44:19 2010 -0700 > > configure.ac: add xi and gl require

Re: [Intel-gfx] xf86-video-intel: configure.ac

2010-07-27 Thread Julien Cristau
On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 08:25:13 -0700, Jesse Barnes wrote: > Apparently MeeGo does automatic packaging based on configure.ac, so > Arjan requested that these be added to make that easier. So we're adding fictional dependencies based on meego brokenness? Do you have more details on the issues the

Re: [Intel-gfx] xf86-video-intel: configure.ac

2010-07-27 Thread Julien Cristau
On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 17:39:11 +0100, Daniel Stone wrote: > > In file included from /usr/include/xorg/scrnintstr.h:58:0, > > from /usr/include/xorg/xf86str.h:39, > > from /usr/include/xorg/xf86.h:46, > > from uxa-priv.h:37, > >

Re: [Intel-gfx] [ANNOUNCE] xf86-video-intel 2.12.901 (2.13 rc1)

2010-09-22 Thread Julien Cristau
On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 13:12:44 +0200, Sven Joachim wrote: > On 2010-09-22 02:48 +0200, Carl Worth wrote: > > > This is the first release candidate in preparation for the upcoming > > 2.13.0 release. We will appreciate any feedback we can get from > > testing of this snapshot. > > It fails to b

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH] Disable DRI2 if we're running on shadowfb

2010-09-22 Thread Julien Cristau
Without this change, DRI2 gets enabled but doesn't work and glxinfo crashes my X server. Signed-off-by: Julien Cristau --- src/intel_driver.c | 13 +++-- 1 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/intel_driver.c b/src/intel_driver.c index c0ad69e..ad

Re: [Intel-gfx] [ANNOUNCE] xf86-video-intel 2.13.0

2010-09-30 Thread Julien Cristau
On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 13:22:50 -0500, Robby Workman wrote: > I'm not interested in who's to blame and who isn't, but I *am* > interested in what's wrong and how to fix it. Here's a link > to the blog post from one of the kde guys - it has a bit of I didn't see a link in your message? > discus

Re: [Intel-gfx] Installing/Compatability

2010-10-25 Thread Julien Cristau
On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 02:15:45 -0400, marcus cox wrote: > would this process work with your drivers as well? > > if not, what is the exact process, or where on your site can i find it. > No. You just get the drivers from your distribution, so stuff works out of the box without having to go do

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/4] drm: fix headers to include linux/types.h

2010-12-01 Thread Julien Cristau
On Wed, Dec 1, 2010 at 17:10:42 +0200, Alexander Shishkin wrote: > For headers that get exported to userland and make use of u32 style > type names, it is advised to include linux/types.h. > > This fixes 5 headers_check warnings. > How many times does this need to be NAKed? These headers are s

Re: [Intel-gfx] QS57/HD Graphics support?

2010-12-04 Thread Julien Cristau
On Sat, Dec 4, 2010 at 11:23:19 +, Alberto Di Meglio wrote: > Of course I'm more than willing to test it, however I need some > hint. I've downloaded the drm-intel-staging snapshot from git > and I tried to compile the drm module against my current kernel > headers, but I get the error "unkno

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] configure: updated m4 macro check in configure.ac

2010-12-21 Thread Julien Cristau
On Tue, Dec 21, 2010 at 23:49:31 +0100, Paul Menzel wrote: > `aptitude` is the recommended package manager for Debian [1]. I don't believe that's true. But it's kind of irrelevant anyway, it should be enough to give the name of the package to install. Cheers, Julien

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 3/5] xvmc: Silence gcc, add parentheses around arithmetic.

2011-01-31 Thread Julien Cristau
On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 06:22:37 +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > Get rid of those accordingly with CFLAGS="-Wall -Werror": > | CC i915_xvmc.lo > | cc1: warnings being treated as errors > | i915_xvmc.c: In function ‘i915_mc_one_time_state_emit’: > | i915_xvmc.c:369: error: suggest parentheses

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] xf86-video-intel: Update autotools configuration

2011-02-09 Thread Julien Cristau
On Wed, Feb 9, 2011 at 11:30:50 +, Javier Jardón wrote: > Hello, > > here another patch to update the autotools configuration of the > xf86-video-intel package > > It uses the new libtool syntax and the new silent build mode. > XORG_DEFAULT_OPTIONS already enables the silent mode, iirc. C

Re: [Intel-gfx] [intel-gfx][intel-gpu-tools][patch] Review of some patches to get rid of some compile warnings

2011-02-09 Thread Julien Cristau
On Wed, Feb 9, 2011 at 18:00:34 +, Diego Celix wrote: > Hello, > > > I've been doing some little modifications of the code of the intel-gpu-tools > package to get the compile warnings fixed. I've divided those changes in > little commits. > > The 0001 patch file fixes these warnings: > int

Re: [Intel-gfx] crash when loading intelfb on D945GSEJT board

2011-02-13 Thread Julien Cristau
On Sun, Feb 13, 2011 at 08:50:07 +0100, Oliver Seitz wrote: > Hi. > > I can not make intelfb run on intel board D945GSEJT. I've tried a > very clean setup, here's what I've done: > Why would you want to use intelfb? Cheers, Julien ___ Intel-gfx mailin

Re: [Intel-gfx] Intel 2.14.0 on Oracle Solaris 11 Express find no screens

2011-02-24 Thread Julien Cristau
On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 11:11:55 -, Marco A. Ferra wrote: > Dear intel-gfx group, > > Perhaps you can give me some assistance. > > I have installed the Oracle Solaris 11 Express operating system on an > Intel Atom CPU D510 that has a Pineview Integrated Graphics Controller > (PineView-D). >

Re: [Intel-gfx] Trying to compile drivers to the Acer Aspire One 532h

2011-02-27 Thread Julien Cristau
On Sun, Feb 27, 2011 at 13:45:20 -0300, Nicolau Werneck wrote: > $ sudo grep -i "glx\|drm" /var/log/Xorg.0.log > (II) "glx" will be loaded. This was enabled by default and also > specified in the config file. > (II) LoadModule: "glx" > (II) Loading /usr/lib/xorg/modules/extensions/libglx.so > (II)

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm: Hold the mode mutex whilst probing for sysfs status

2011-03-15 Thread Julien Cristau
On Tue, Mar 15, 2011 at 11:40:00 +, Chris Wilson wrote: > [Digression: what is upowerd doing reading those power hungry files?] > Apparently, checking "docked" status every 30 seconds, by reading the status of drm outputs. Where "docked" means "more than one output connected". Yes, it's sil

Re: [Intel-gfx] Intel i3 / 945GM/ KMS / Debian

2011-03-20 Thread Julien Cristau
On Sun, Mar 20, 2011 at 18:52:07 +0100, Christophe Gallaire wrote: > Hello, > > My machine, a Lenovo U160, running with an Intel i3, Debian, testing stage. I > tried everything to exploit the graphics capabilities with the driver > xserver-xorg-vidéo-intel from all branches of Debian. Activated w

Re: [Intel-gfx] xf86-video-intel: 3 commits - src/intel_display.c src/intel_dri.c src/intel.h

2011-03-23 Thread Julien Cristau
Hi Keith, a couple suggestions below from a quick look over these patches. On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 17:24:57 -0700, Keith Packard wrote: > commit e1ff5182304e00c0d392092069422cae7626cf8d > Author: Keith Packard > Date: Wed Mar 9 17:00:41 2011 -0800 > > Handle drawable/client destruction i

Re: [Intel-gfx] xf86-video-intel: 3 commits - src/intel_display.c src/intel_dri.c src/intel.h

2011-03-24 Thread Julien Cristau
On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 11:09:36 -0700, Keith Packard wrote: > diff --git a/src/intel_dri.c b/src/intel_dri.c > index 3b80823..f7a4fc4 100644 > --- a/src/intel_dri.c > +++ b/src/intel_dri.c > @@ -625,8 +625,10 @@ i830_dri2_add_frame_event(DRI2FrameEventPtr frame_event) > if (!AddResource(fra

Re: [Intel-gfx] xf86-video-intel: 3 commits - src/intel_display.c src/intel_dri.c src/intel.h

2011-03-24 Thread Julien Cristau
On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 16:52:25 -0700, Keith Packard wrote: > On Thu, 24 Mar 2011 19:31:03 +0100, Julien Cristau > wrote: > > > This will cause a double free as the blit_fallback path does it too. > > Argh! So we need to check before we reference the buffers and set >

Re: [Intel-gfx] [ANNOUNCE] xf86-video-intel 2.14.902

2011-03-29 Thread Julien Cristau
On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 14:11:43 +0300, Christophe Gallaire wrote: > Does this new version contains the fix for the Lenovo U160? > You need a kernel fix. This is not a kernel. So no. Cheers, Julien ___ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedeskt

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: hangcheck disable parameter

2011-07-02 Thread Julien Cristau
On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 17:09:54 -0700, Ben Widawsky wrote: > Provide a parameter to disable hanghcheck. This is useful mostly for > developers trying to debug known problems, and probably should not be > touched by normal users. > Something like this could maybe find its way into a MODULE_PARM_D

Re: [Intel-gfx] [ANNOUNCE] xf86-video-intel 2.99.917

2015-05-06 Thread Julien Cristau
On Sun, Dec 21, 2014 at 14:47:58 +, Chris Wilson wrote: > Snapshot 2.99.917 (2014-12-21) > == > 3 months drifted by whilst I looked elsewhere for bugs.. The highlight of > bugs fixed here are a couple of workarounds required for Broadwell and > making sure that the