On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 09:46:19 -0700, Carl Worth wrote: > On Tue, 15 Jun 2010 10:18:17 +0100, Julien Cristau <jcris...@debian.org> > wrote: > > On Mon, Jun 14, 2010 at 17:39:54 -0700, Carl Worth wrote: > > > > > New requirements compared to 2.10 > > > --------------------------------- > > > * Libdrm >= 2.4.19 > > > > > The requirement is actually 2.4.21, afaict. > > Can you give more details of what's required in 2.4.21 so that I can > make a commit message that explains it? > > I made the bump to require 2.4.19 when I noticed a failure to compile > against 2.4.16 with an unresolved drm_intel_bo_emit_reloc_fence > function. So the commit message I wrote was: > > Fix to require libdrm 2.4.19 or newer. > > This is necessary for the drm_intel_bo_emit_reloc_fence function which > did not exist in 2.4.16 which is all we were requiring earlier. > > I'd like something similar to accompany a commit requiring 2.4.21. > Chris fixed this already, http://cgit.freedesktop.org/xorg/driver/xf86-video-intel/commit/?id=254bcc40fca6ed9aa0b71f2115c654667f16aec6
Cheers, Julien
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
