[Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 rebased] ACPI / video: Add systems that should favor native backlight interface

2013-11-20 Thread Aaron Lu
On 11/21/2013 04:56 AM, Igor Gnatenko wrote: > Any news here? If no - I think we need re-send patch as new.. Since the v2 patch can't apply cleanly on top of pm's -next tree, I think it's worth a re-send, so here it comes. --- Subject: [PATCH] ACPI / video: Add systems that should favor native ba

Re: [Intel-gfx] AVI infoframes: default aspect ratio/VIC for CEA modes

2013-11-20 Thread Gohad, Tushar
> On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 11:45:03PM +, Gohad, Tushar wrote: > > > > On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 09:48:26PM +, Gohad, Tushar wrote: > > > > > Folks, > > > > > > > > > > When filling in an HDMI AVI infoframe, how does one correctly > > > > > determine the "default" picture aspect ratio (and VIC)

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] intel: make sure VG_CLEAR() will always do memory clear

2013-11-20 Thread Zhenyu Wang
On 2013.11.20 16:59:22 +, Damien Lespiau wrote: > Right, so the fix is (was) to zero the fields checked by the kernel > explicitely, not change the VG() macro, which is just used in testing > (and it should this way). > That's fine. Thanks. -- Open Source Technology Center, Intel ltd. $gpg

Re: [Intel-gfx] AVI infoframes: default aspect ratio/VIC for CEA modes

2013-11-20 Thread Damien Lespiau
On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 11:45:03PM +, Gohad, Tushar wrote: > > > On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 09:48:26PM +, Gohad, Tushar wrote: > > > > Folks, > > > > > > > > When filling in an HDMI AVI infoframe, how does > > > > one correctly determine the "default" picture aspect ratio (and VIC) > > > > for

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 06/10] drm/i915: Implement LRI based FBC tracking

2013-11-20 Thread Rodrigo Vivi
actually just ignore my last msg... alternate between gmail and mutt confused me... On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 1:02 PM, wrote: > From: Ville Syrjälä > > As per the SNB and HSW PM guides, we should enable FBC render/blitter > tracking only during batches targetting the front buffer. > > On SNB we

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 06/10] drm/i915: Implement LRI based FBC tracking

2013-11-20 Thread Rodrigo Vivi
ops, I just noticed that by mistake I replied the v1-series but I actually looked to v2 seires... Sorry about that On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 3:17 PM, Chris Wilson wrote: > On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 02:55:57PM -0800, Rodrigo Vivi wrote: >> On Wed, Nov 06, 2013 at 11:02:21PM +0200, ville.syrj...@li

Re: [Intel-gfx] AVI infoframes: default aspect ratio/VIC for CEA modes

2013-11-20 Thread Gohad, Tushar
> > On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 09:48:26PM +, Gohad, Tushar wrote: > > > Folks, > > > > > > When filling in an HDMI AVI infoframe, how does > > > one correctly determine the "default" picture aspect ratio (and VIC) > > > for CEA modes that support multiple (4:3 and 16:9) aspect ratios. > > > 720x57

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 06/10] drm/i915: Implement LRI based FBC tracking

2013-11-20 Thread Chris Wilson
On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 02:55:57PM -0800, Rodrigo Vivi wrote: > On Wed, Nov 06, 2013 at 11:02:21PM +0200, ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com wrote: > > static void > > +i915_gem_execbuffer_mark_fbc_dirty(struct intel_ring_buffer *ring, > > + struct list_head *vmas) > > +{ >

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 09/10] drm/i915: Set has_fbc=true for all SNB+, except VLV

2013-11-20 Thread Rodrigo Vivi
Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi On Wed, Nov 06, 2013 at 11:02:24PM +0200, ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com wrote: > From: Ville Syrjälä > > At least since SNB (perhaps even earlier) even the desktop parts > should have FBC. > > Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä > --- > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c | 6

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 10/10] drm/i915: Use plane_name() in gen7_enable_fbc()

2013-11-20 Thread Rodrigo Vivi
Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi On Wed, Nov 06, 2013 at 11:02:25PM +0200, ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com wrote: > From: Ville Syrjälä > > All the other .enable_fbc() funcs use plane_name(). Make > gen7_enable_fbc() do the same. > > Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä > --- > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 07/10] drm/i915: Kill sandybridge_blit_fbc_update()

2013-11-20 Thread Rodrigo Vivi
On Wed, Nov 06, 2013 at 11:02:22PM +0200, ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com wrote: > From: Ville Syrjälä > > No longer needed since the LRIs do the work. Shouldn't this be part of previous patch? > > v2: Rebased due to hunk getting dropped from an ealier patch > > Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä >

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 08/10] drm/i915: Don't write ILK/IVB_FBC_RT_BASE directly

2013-11-20 Thread Rodrigo Vivi
On Wed, Nov 06, 2013 at 11:02:23PM +0200, ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com wrote: > From: Ville Syrjälä > > We use LRIs to enable/disable the render tracking as needed. So leave > ILK_FBC_RT_BASE alone when enabling FBC on SNB. Shouldn't this be part of patch 6 > > While at it, kill the IVB_FBC_RT

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 06/10] drm/i915: Implement LRI based FBC tracking

2013-11-20 Thread Rodrigo Vivi
On Wed, Nov 06, 2013 at 11:02:21PM +0200, ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com wrote: > From: Ville Syrjälä > > As per the SNB and HSW PM guides, we should enable FBC render/blitter > tracking only during batches targetting the front buffer. You improved things a lot here, but I'm just not convinced th

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 05/10] drm/i915: Emit SRM after the MSG_FBC_REND_STATE LRI

2013-11-20 Thread Rodrigo Vivi
Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi On Wed, Nov 06, 2013 at 11:02:20PM +0200, ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com wrote: > From: Ville Syrjälä > > The spec tells us that we need to emit an SRM after the LRI > to MSG_FBC_REND_STATE. > > Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä > --- > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 04/10] drm/i915: Limit FBC flush to post batch flush

2013-11-20 Thread Rodrigo Vivi
On Wed, Nov 06, 2013 at 11:02:19PM +0200, ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com wrote: > From: Ville Syrjälä > > Don't issue the FBC nuke/cache clean command when invalidate_domains!=0. Double negative almost confused me, but all right here. Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi > That would indicate that we're

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 01/10] drm/i915: Grab struct_mutex around all FBC updates

2013-11-20 Thread Rodrigo Vivi
On Wed, Nov 06, 2013 at 11:02:16PM +0200, ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com wrote: > From: Ville Syrjälä > > We need some protection for the FBC state, and since struct_mutex > is it currently in most places, make sure all FBC update/disable > calles are protected by it. Why don't you create a new m

Re: [Intel-gfx] AVI infoframes: default aspect ratio/VIC for CEA modes

2013-11-20 Thread Damien Lespiau
On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 10:11:55PM +, Damien Lespiau wrote: > On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 09:48:26PM +, Gohad, Tushar wrote: > > Folks, > > > > A newbie question - When filling in an HDMI AVI infoframe, how does > > one correctly determine the "default" picture aspect ratio (and VIC) > > for C

Re: [Intel-gfx] AVI infoframes: default aspect ratio/VIC for CEA modes

2013-11-20 Thread Damien Lespiau
On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 09:48:26PM +, Gohad, Tushar wrote: > Folks, > > A newbie question - When filling in an HDMI AVI infoframe, how does > one correctly determine the "default" picture aspect ratio (and VIC) > for CEA modes that support multiple (4:3 and 16:9) aspect ratios. > 720x576p for

[Intel-gfx] AVI infoframes: default aspect ratio/VIC for CEA modes

2013-11-20 Thread Gohad, Tushar
Folks, A newbie question - When filling in an HDMI AVI infoframe, how does one correctly determine the "default" picture aspect ratio (and VIC) for CEA modes that support multiple (4:3 and 16:9) aspect ratios. 720x576p for example, corresponds to VIC 17 or 18: /* 17 - 720x576@50Hz */

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2] ACPI / video: Add systems that should favor native backlight interface

2013-11-20 Thread Igor Gnatenko
On Fri, 2013-11-15 at 14:07 +0800, Aaron Lu wrote: > Some system's ACPI video backlight control interface is broken and the > native backlight control interface should be used by default. This patch > sets the use_native_backlight parameter to true for those systems so > that video backlight contro

Re: [Intel-gfx] i915 driver gpu hung kernel 3.11

2013-11-20 Thread Bruno Prémont
Hi Stephen, On Wed, 20 November 2013 Stephen Clark wrote: > Hi Bruno, > > I have tested the latest kernel and X, mesa etc, but am still using > wine-1.3.24. > I am working on upgrading that. If I still have the error I will file > a bug report at bugs.freedesktop.org. I already have a login beca

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/4] Support 64-bit MSC values. Handle kernel vageries about MSC reporting

2013-11-20 Thread Keith Packard
The kernel sometimes reports bogus MSC values, especially when suspending and resuming the machine. Deal with this by tracking an offset to ensure that the MSC seen by applications increases monotonically, and at a reasonable pace. Also, provide a full 64 bits of MSC value by noticing wrapping and

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 3/4] Add DRI3 and miSyncShm support

2013-11-20 Thread Keith Packard
Signed-off-by: Keith Packard --- configure.ac | 14 src/uxa/Makefile.am| 7 ++ src/uxa/intel.h| 17 + src/uxa/intel_dri3.c | 184 + src/uxa/intel_driver.c | 13 src/uxa/intel_sync.c | 109

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 4/4] Add Present extension support

2013-11-20 Thread Keith Packard
Signed-off-by: Keith Packard --- configure.ac| 15 ++ src/uxa/Makefile.am | 6 + src/uxa/intel.h | 15 ++ src/uxa/intel_driver.c | 4 + src/uxa/intel_present.c | 406 5 files changed, 446 insertions(+) create mode 10

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/4] Restructure DRM event handling.

2013-11-20 Thread Keith Packard
This refactors the drm interrupt handling logic quite a bit, both to allow for either DRI2 or Present handlers, but also to eliminate passing pointers through the kernel. Passing pointers left the kernel holding the only reference to some internal X server data structures. After a server reset, th

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 0/4] xf86-video-intel DRI3 and Present patch series

2013-11-20 Thread Keith Packard
Here's a series of patches which provide DRI3 and Present support in the Intel 2D driver. The first two patches pave the way by synthesizing 64-bit vblank counters and extending the DRM event handling to allow for both DRI2 and DRI3 events. Then there's a patch to add DRI2 and miSyncShm support fol

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 3/3] tests/gem_reset_stats: check non root access to reset_stats

2013-11-20 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 04:58:17PM +0200, Mika Kuoppala wrote: > Getting global reset count needs to be tested with root and > non root access. > > Signed-off-by: Mika Kuoppala All merged to igt, thanks for the patches. -Daniel > --- > tests/gem_reset_stats.c | 70 > +

Re: [Intel-gfx] i915 driver gpu hung kernel 3.11

2013-11-20 Thread Stephen Clark
Hi Bruno, I have tested the latest kernel and X, mesa etc, but am still using wine-1.3.24. I am working on upgrading that. If I still have the error I will file a bug report at bugs.freedesktop.org. I already have a login because of the same problem happening with Myst 5, but it was never resol

Re: [Intel-gfx] i915 driver gpu hung kernel 3.11

2013-11-20 Thread Bruno Prémont
Hi Stephen, On Tue, 19 November 2013 Stephen Clark wrote: > Thanks for the response. I have subscribed to the intel-gfx list. I didn't > post > the error_state file since it huge. It's best to submit a but report on bugs.freedesktop.org and attach the error_state there (compressed if needed) -

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/2] drm/i915: Report all GTFIFODBG errors

2013-11-20 Thread Ville Syrjälä
On Mon, Nov 18, 2013 at 05:13:19PM +0200, Ville Syrjälä wrote: > On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 07:09:48PM +0200, Ville Syrjälä wrote: > > On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 02:54:10PM +0200, Mika Kuoppala wrote: > > > ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com writes: > > > > > > > From: Ville Syrjälä > > > > > > > > On VLV G

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] intel: make sure VG_CLEAR() will always do memory clear

2013-11-20 Thread Damien Lespiau
On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 11:53:54PM +0800, Zhenyu Wang wrote: > > VG_CLEAR() is really just for valgrind. If you need to set some specific > > variable/field to 0 then you need to set it to 0 and not rely on > > VG_CLEAR() to do it for you. > > > > ok, in valgrind case it does memory clear for ioc

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] intel: Use memset instead of VG_CLEAR

2013-11-20 Thread Damien Lespiau
On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 08:38:38AM -0800, Ian Romanick wrote: > From: Ian Romanick > > The ioctl expects that certain fields will be zeroed, so we should allow > the helper function to actually work in non-Valgrind builds. > > Signed-off-by: Ian Romanick > Reported-by: Zhenyu Wang > Cc: Damien

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 5/9] drm/i915: print object bindings in debugfs

2013-11-20 Thread Rodrigo Vivi
On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 3:03 AM, Chris Wilson wrote: > On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 09:37:16AM -0800, Rodrigo Vivi wrote: >> On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 5:52 AM, Chris Wilson >> wrote: >> > On Mon, Nov 18, 2013 at 06:32:34PM -0800, Rodrigo Vivi wrote: >> >> From: Daniel Vetter >> >> >> >> This is useful

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/vlv: Add VLV specific force wake routines.

2013-11-20 Thread Jesse Barnes
On Wed, 20 Nov 2013 06:00:24 + "S, Deepak" wrote: > Hi Jesse, > > Thanks for the review. Below is my response. > > > - why not use the callback to __vlv_force_wake_* from > gen6_gt_force_wake_*? i.e. why is VLV special here? > [Deepak] Gen6 has a single power well whereas the VLV

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] intel: Use memset instead of VG_CLEAR

2013-11-20 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 08:38:38AM -0800, Ian Romanick wrote: > From: Ian Romanick > > The ioctl expects that certain fields will be zeroed, so we should allow > the helper function to actually work in non-Valgrind builds. > > Signed-off-by: Ian Romanick > Reported-by: Zhenyu Wang > Cc: Damien

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH] intel: Use memset instead of VG_CLEAR

2013-11-20 Thread Ian Romanick
From: Ian Romanick The ioctl expects that certain fields will be zeroed, so we should allow the helper function to actually work in non-Valgrind builds. Signed-off-by: Ian Romanick Reported-by: Zhenyu Wang Cc: Damien Lespiau Cc: Daniel Vetter --- intel/intel_bufmgr_gem.c | 2 +- 1 file chan

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/vlv: Add VLV specific force wake routines.

2013-11-20 Thread S, Deepak
Thanks Jesse, I wil split the patches and send it for review. Thanks Deepak -Original Message- From: Jesse Barnes [mailto:jbar...@virtuousgeek.org] Sent: Wednesday, November 20, 2013 9:35 PM To: S, Deepak Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/vlv:

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/vlv: Add VLV specific force wake routines.

2013-11-20 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 7:00 AM, S, Deepak wrote: >>- have you done measurements on this? given how infrequently we > ought to be waking the wells when they're idle, and how long we > generally keep them awake, is this a real power win? > [Deepak] By Individually controlling the wells we

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] intel: make sure VG_CLEAR() will always do memory clear

2013-11-20 Thread Zhenyu Wang
On 2013.11.20 11:36:20 +, Damien Lespiau wrote: > On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 05:22:48PM +0800, Zhenyu Wang wrote: > > If valgrind is not available, current VG_CLEAR() would just ignore > > memory clear operation which might make invalid ioctl argument. So > > make sure VG_CLEAR() will always clear

[Intel-gfx] [PULL] drm-intel-fixes

2013-11-20 Thread Daniel Vetter
Hi Dave, Just a small pile of fixes for bugs and a few regressions. I'm still trying to track down a driver load hang on my g33 (which infuriatingly doesn't happen when loading the module manually after boot), somehow bisecting loves to go astray on this one :( And there's a (harmless) locking WAR

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/3] tests/gem_reset_stats: add support for BDW+

2013-11-20 Thread Mika Kuoppala
For BDW+, there BATCH_BUFFER_START is 3 * 32bits in length and length needs to be encoded into the opcode. Suggested-by: Damien Lespiau Signed-off-by: Mika Kuoppala --- tests/gem_reset_stats.c | 12 +--- 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/tests/gem_reset_sta

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 3/3] tests/gem_reset_stats: check non root access to reset_stats

2013-11-20 Thread Mika Kuoppala
Getting global reset count needs to be tested with root and non root access. Signed-off-by: Mika Kuoppala --- tests/gem_reset_stats.c | 70 +-- 1 file changed, 61 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-) diff --git a/tests/gem_reset_stats.c b/tests/gem_reset_s

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/3] tests/gem_reset_stats: stop rings after injecting hang

2013-11-20 Thread Mika Kuoppala
To make driver report a simulated hang in dmesg. Suggested-by: Daniel Vetter Signed-off-by: Mika Kuoppala --- tests/gem_reset_stats.c | 18 ++ 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+) diff --git a/tests/gem_reset_stats.c b/tests/gem_reset_stats.c index a7497f3..9e52b60 100644 --- a/t

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Fix gen3 self-refresh watermarks

2013-11-20 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 04:47:14PM +0200, Ville Syrjälä wrote: > On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 03:02:10PM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote: > > This regression has been introduced in > > > > commit 4fe8590a921d0b2e36e542dbfa89a8c5993f5a3f > > Author: Ville Syrjälä > > Date: Wed Sep 4 18:25:22 2013 +0300 >

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Fix gen3 self-refresh watermarks

2013-11-20 Thread Ville Syrjälä
On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 03:02:10PM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote: > This regression has been introduced in > > commit 4fe8590a921d0b2e36e542dbfa89a8c5993f5a3f > Author: Ville Syrjälä > Date: Wed Sep 4 18:25:22 2013 +0300 > > drm/i915: Use adjusted_mode appropriately when computing watermarks

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Fix gen3 self-refresh watermarks

2013-11-20 Thread Daniel Vetter
This regression has been introduced in commit 4fe8590a921d0b2e36e542dbfa89a8c5993f5a3f Author: Ville Syrjälä Date: Wed Sep 4 18:25:22 2013 +0300 drm/i915: Use adjusted_mode appropriately when computing watermarks I guess we should renable the enabled local variable into something a notch

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/5] drm/i915: retrieve current fb config into new plane_config structure at init

2013-11-20 Thread Ville Syrjälä
On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 10:20:45AM -0800, Jesse Barnes wrote: > Read out the current plane configuration at init time into a new > plane_config structure. This allows us to track any existing > framebuffers attached to the plane and potentially re-use them in our > fbdev code for a smooth handoff.

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: setup workarounds on reset

2013-11-20 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 12:47 PM, Mika Kuoppala wrote: > FAIL WaDisableEarlyCull:ivb > OK WaDisableBackToBackFlipFix:ivb > FAIL WaDisablePSDDualDispatchEnable:ivb > FAIL WaDisableRHWOptimizationForRenderHang:ivb > FAIL WaApplyL3ControlAndL3ChickenMode:ivb > OK WaForceL3

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: setup workarounds on reset

2013-11-20 Thread Mika Kuoppala
Daniel Vetter writes: Hi Daniel, > On Mon, Nov 18, 2013 at 04:34:44PM +0200, Mika Kuoppala wrote: >> Large parts of hw initialization is behind per gen >> clock gating functions. Including workarounds. >> >> Call intel_modeset_init_hw after reset so that we >> set these up correctly. >> >> Sig

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] intel: make sure VG_CLEAR() will always do memory clear

2013-11-20 Thread Damien Lespiau
On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 05:22:48PM +0800, Zhenyu Wang wrote: > If valgrind is not available, current VG_CLEAR() would just ignore > memory clear operation which might make invalid ioctl argument. So > make sure VG_CLEAR() will always clear memory. > --- > intel/intel_bufmgr_gem.c | 2 +- > 1 file

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 5/9] drm/i915: print object bindings in debugfs

2013-11-20 Thread Chris Wilson
On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 09:37:16AM -0800, Rodrigo Vivi wrote: > On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 5:52 AM, Chris Wilson > wrote: > > On Mon, Nov 18, 2013 at 06:32:34PM -0800, Rodrigo Vivi wrote: > >> From: Daniel Vetter > >> > >> This is useful when we only have aliasing ppgtt and want to figure out > >>

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] Added a lower limit for the watermark setting

2013-11-20 Thread Thomas Richter
Am 20.11.2013 10:27, schrieb Daniel Vetter: What I've meant to say is that I want to split up the watermark code more anyway, so that there's no need to fill in the 0 all over the place where we don't care one bit. I.e. all the gen4+ platforms. Ok - well, I guess I cannot judge whether that's n

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] Added a lower limit for the watermark setting

2013-11-20 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 10:18 AM, Thomas Richter wrote: >> I think we ned to split out the gen2/3 single/dual pipe watermark code a >> >> bit better from everything else. A bugfix for i830M shouldn't really >> affect snb ;-) > > > Actually, the fun part is that it does not because all the lower li

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH] intel: make sure VG_CLEAR() will always do memory clear

2013-11-20 Thread Zhenyu Wang
If valgrind is not available, current VG_CLEAR() would just ignore memory clear operation which might make invalid ioctl argument. So make sure VG_CLEAR() will always clear memory. --- intel/intel_bufmgr_gem.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/intel/intel_bufmgr_g

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] Added a lower limit for the watermark setting

2013-11-20 Thread Thomas Richter
Am 19.11.2013 17:41, schrieb Daniel Vetter: On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 05:15:09PM +0100, Thomas Richter wrote: Hi Daniel, dear intel experts, please find a patch attached that finally addresses the display flicker on i830 chipsets. This patch adds a lower watermark setting in intel_watermark_param