On Wed, Nov 06, 2013 at 11:02:19PM +0200, ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com wrote: > From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com> > > Don't issue the FBC nuke/cache clean command when invalidate_domains!=0.
Double negative almost confused me, but all right here. Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.v...@gmail.com> > That would indicate that we're not being called for the post-batch > flush. > > Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com> > --- > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c | 4 ++-- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c > index e32c08a..752f208 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c > @@ -354,7 +354,7 @@ gen7_render_ring_flush(struct intel_ring_buffer *ring, > intel_ring_emit(ring, 0); > intel_ring_advance(ring); > > - if (flush_domains) > + if (!invalidate_domains && flush_domains) > return gen7_ring_fbc_flush(ring, FBC_REND_NUKE); > > return 0; > @@ -1837,7 +1837,7 @@ static int gen6_ring_flush(struct intel_ring_buffer > *ring, > } > intel_ring_advance(ring); > > - if (IS_GEN7(dev) && flush) > + if (IS_GEN7(dev) && !invalidate && flush) > return gen7_ring_fbc_flush(ring, FBC_REND_CACHE_CLEAN); > > return 0; > -- > 1.8.1.5 > > _______________________________________________ > Intel-gfx mailing list > Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org > http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
