[Intel-gfx] Intel 2011Q3 release

2011-08-09 Thread Jin, Gordon
Hi, We'd like to announce Intel 2011Q3 graphics package (note there's no 2011Q2 release), with bug fixes as usual, and Alpha support for Ivy Bridge (Intel 2012 platforms). Please check http://intellinuxgraphics.org/2011Q3.html for the recommended stack, new features and known issues. Thanks c

Re: [Intel-gfx] Major 2.6.38 / 2.6.39 / 3.0 regression ignored?

2011-08-09 Thread Kirill Smelkov
On Tue, Aug 09, 2011 at 09:56:01AM -0700, Ray Lee wrote: > On Tue, Aug 9, 2011 at 9:32 AM, Kirill Smelkov wrote: > > Quite frankly, I don't understand intel-gfx developers attitude: why is > > it me, just random user who is nitpicking here? Why there is no > > interest/will to analyze now obviousl

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: limit PM related interrupt enable to those we handle

2011-08-09 Thread Jesse Barnes
On Tue, 09 Aug 2011 10:02:54 -0700 Keith Packard wrote: > On Tue, 9 Aug 2011 09:29:20 -0700, Jesse Barnes > wrote: > > > - I915_WRITE(GEN6_PMIMR, 0); > > + I915_WRITE(GEN6_PMIMR, ~GEN6_PM_DEFERRED_EVENTS); > > spin_unlock_irq(&dev_priv->rps_lock); > > - /* enable all PM interrupts *

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: limit PM related interrupt enable to those we handle

2011-08-09 Thread Keith Packard
On Tue, 9 Aug 2011 09:29:20 -0700, Jesse Barnes wrote: > - I915_WRITE(GEN6_PMIMR, 0); > + I915_WRITE(GEN6_PMIMR, ~GEN6_PM_DEFERRED_EVENTS); > spin_unlock_irq(&dev_priv->rps_lock); > - /* enable all PM interrupts */ > - I915_WRITE(GEN6_PMINTRMSK, 0); > + /* Enable only

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: show interrupt info on IVB

2011-08-09 Thread Jesse Barnes
On Tue, 09 Aug 2011 09:38:56 -0700 Keith Packard wrote: > On Tue, 9 Aug 2011 09:17:46 -0700, Jesse Barnes > wrote: > > > IVB uses the same interrupt reg layout as SNB, so add an IS_GEN7 to the > > interrupt debugfs file. > > Here's a list of code which uses IS_GEN6 but is not also using > IS

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: show interrupt info on IVB

2011-08-09 Thread Keith Packard
On Tue, 9 Aug 2011 09:17:46 -0700, Jesse Barnes wrote: > IVB uses the same interrupt reg layout as SNB, so add an IS_GEN7 to the > interrupt debugfs file. Here's a list of code which uses IS_GEN6 but is not also using IS_GEN7 or IS_IVYBRIDGE. Seems like some of these should get fixed too: i91

Re: [Intel-gfx] Major 2.6.38 / 2.6.39 / 3.0 regression ignored?

2011-08-09 Thread Kirill Smelkov
On Tue, Aug 09, 2011 at 07:02:59PM +0300, Vasily Khoruzhick wrote: > On Tuesday 09 August 2011 18:34:46 Kirill Smelkov wrote: > > On Tue, Aug 09, 2011 at 06:09:57PM +0300, Vasily Khoruzhick wrote: > > > On Tuesday 09 August 2011 17:47:56 Kirill Smelkov wrote: > > > > On Tue, Aug 09, 2011 at 05:00:5

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: limit PM related interrupt enable to those we handle

2011-08-09 Thread Jesse Barnes
Set both the PM core interrupt regs and the PM specific interrupt maks to only allow interrupts we handle. This prevents spurious interrupts and just makes more sense. Signed-off-by: Jesse Barnes --- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h |6 ++ drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c | 12

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: show interrupt info on IVB

2011-08-09 Thread Jesse Barnes
IVB uses the same interrupt reg layout as SNB, so add an IS_GEN7 to the interrupt debugfs file. Signed-off-by: Jesse Barnes --- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c |2 +- 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i91

Re: [Intel-gfx] Major 2.6.38 / 2.6.39 / 3.0 regression ignored?

2011-08-09 Thread Vasily Khoruzhick
On Tuesday 09 August 2011 18:34:46 Kirill Smelkov wrote: > On Tue, Aug 09, 2011 at 06:09:57PM +0300, Vasily Khoruzhick wrote: > > On Tuesday 09 August 2011 17:47:56 Kirill Smelkov wrote: > > > On Tue, Aug 09, 2011 at 05:00:52PM +0300, Vasily Khoruzhick wrote: > > > > On Tuesday 09 August 2011 15:08

Re: [Intel-gfx] Major 2.6.38 / 2.6.39 / 3.0 regression ignored?

2011-08-09 Thread Kirill Smelkov
On Tue, Aug 09, 2011 at 06:09:57PM +0300, Vasily Khoruzhick wrote: > On Tuesday 09 August 2011 17:47:56 Kirill Smelkov wrote: > > On Tue, Aug 09, 2011 at 05:00:52PM +0300, Vasily Khoruzhick wrote: > > > On Tuesday 09 August 2011 15:08:03 Kirill Smelkov wrote: > > > > On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 05:48:2

Re: [Intel-gfx] Major 2.6.38 / 2.6.39 / 3.0 regression ignored?

2011-08-09 Thread Vasily Khoruzhick
On Tuesday 09 August 2011 17:47:56 Kirill Smelkov wrote: > On Tue, Aug 09, 2011 at 05:00:52PM +0300, Vasily Khoruzhick wrote: > > On Tuesday 09 August 2011 15:08:03 Kirill Smelkov wrote: > > > On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 05:48:27PM +0400, Kirill Smelkov wrote: > > > > On Sat, Jul 23, 2011 at 12:23:36AM

Re: [Intel-gfx] Major 2.6.38 / 2.6.39 / 3.0 regression ignored?

2011-08-09 Thread Kirill Smelkov
On Tue, Aug 09, 2011 at 05:00:52PM +0300, Vasily Khoruzhick wrote: > On Tuesday 09 August 2011 15:08:03 Kirill Smelkov wrote: > > On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 05:48:27PM +0400, Kirill Smelkov wrote: > > > On Sat, Jul 23, 2011 at 12:23:36AM +0400, Kirill Smelkov wrote: > > > > Keith, > > > > > > > > fir

Re: [Intel-gfx] Major 2.6.38 / 2.6.39 / 3.0 regression ignored?

2011-08-09 Thread Vasily Khoruzhick
On Tuesday 09 August 2011 15:08:03 Kirill Smelkov wrote: > On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 05:48:27PM +0400, Kirill Smelkov wrote: > > On Sat, Jul 23, 2011 at 12:23:36AM +0400, Kirill Smelkov wrote: > > > Keith, > > > > > > first of all thanks for your prompt reply. Then... > > > > > > On Fri, Jul 22, 20

Re: [Intel-gfx] no video output when usign custom alsa device

2011-08-09 Thread Dexter Filmore
This is waht I get when using the custom alsa device - a GL shader error. Might actually be a driver bug. Or a Mesa bug. or Alsa bug. Or mplayer... == Opening audio decoder: [ffmpeg] FFmpeg/libavcodec audio decoders AUDIO: 48

Re: [Intel-gfx] Major 2.6.38 / 2.6.39 / 3.0 regression ignored?

2011-08-09 Thread Kirill Smelkov
On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 05:48:27PM +0400, Kirill Smelkov wrote: > On Sat, Jul 23, 2011 at 12:23:36AM +0400, Kirill Smelkov wrote: > > Keith, > > > > first of all thanks for your prompt reply. Then... > > > > On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 11:00:41AM -0700, Keith Packard wrote: > > > On Fri, 22 Jul 2011