Hello,
I'm looking for some documentation or assistance on getting
"inteldrmfb" (from 2.6.36) to work on a GM965 connected to an HDTV
which is sending incorrect EDID information. Basically what's
occurring is the monitor (a Toshiba HDTV) is sending an incorrect
modeline:
BAD: Modeline "1920x10
On Wed, 8 Dec 2010 13:46:38 -0800, Bryan Freed wrote:
> The i915 driver normally assumes the video bios has configured several
> of the LVDS panel registers, and it just inherits the values. If the
> vbios has not run, several of these will need to be setup.
>
> intel_bios.c: default clock source
The DisplayPort standard (1.1a) states that:
The I2C-over-AUX Reply field is valid only when Native AUX CH Reply
field is AUX_ACK (00). When Native AUX CH Reply field is not 00, then,
I2C-over-AUX Reply field must be 00 and be ignored.
This fixes broken EDID reading when using an active Disp
The i915 driver normally assumes the video bios has configured several
of the LVDS panel registers, and it just inherits the values. If the
vbios has not run, several of these will need to be setup.
intel_bios.c: default clock source selection on pineview to use the SSC
source
intel_display.c: ens
On Wed, 8 Dec 2010 16:10:21 +, David Flynn wrote:
> The DisplayPort standard (1.1a) states that:
> The I2C-over-AUX Reply field is valid only when Native AUX CH Reply
> field is AUX_ACK (00). When Native AUX CH Reply field is not 00, then,
> I2C-over-AUX Reply field must be 00 and be ign
On Wednesday 08 December 2010 20:19:19 Andrew Lutomirski wrote:
> http://www.spinics.net/lists/kernel/msg1120988.html
>
> I'd test but I don't think my system is affected. :)
>
> --Andy
Nope, still no effect, even with latency decreased to 5, will test with lower
values later.
On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 1:17 PM, Andrew Lutomirski wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 7, 2010 at 5:13 PM, Chris Wilson wrote:
>> On Tue, 7 Dec 2010 16:31:24 -0500, Andrew Lutomirski wrote:
>>> On Tue, Dec 7, 2010 at 4:03 PM, Andrew Lutomirski wrote:
>>> > Hi all-
>>> >
>>> > Somewhere between Fedora 13 (with
On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 1:14 PM, Vasily Khoruzhick wrote:
> On Wednesday 08 December 2010 19:54:59 Andrew Lutomirski wrote:
>> On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 12:00 PM, Vasily Khoruzhick
> wrote:
>> > On Wednesday 08 December 2010 18:54:21 Chris Wilson wrote:
>> >> On Wed, 8 Dec 2010 18:44:41 +0200, Vasily
On Tue, Dec 7, 2010 at 5:13 PM, Chris Wilson wrote:
> On Tue, 7 Dec 2010 16:31:24 -0500, Andrew Lutomirski wrote:
>> On Tue, Dec 7, 2010 at 4:03 PM, Andrew Lutomirski wrote:
>> > Hi all-
>> >
>> > Somewhere between Fedora 13 (with 2.6.35, I think) and Fedora 14 +
>> > 2.6.36.1, i915 started gene
On Wednesday 08 December 2010 19:54:59 Andrew Lutomirski wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 12:00 PM, Vasily Khoruzhick
wrote:
> > On Wednesday 08 December 2010 18:54:21 Chris Wilson wrote:
> >> On Wed, 8 Dec 2010 18:44:41 +0200, Vasily Khoruzhick
> >>
> >
> > wrote:
> >> > On Wednesday 08 Decembe
On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 12:00 PM, Vasily Khoruzhick wrote:
> On Wednesday 08 December 2010 18:54:21 Chris Wilson wrote:
>> On Wed, 8 Dec 2010 18:44:41 +0200, Vasily Khoruzhick
> wrote:
>> > On Wednesday 08 December 2010 18:24:35 Chris Wilson wrote:
>> > > This is just a preliminary attempt to see
On Wed, 08 Dec 2010 17:08:04 +, Chris Wilson
wrote:
> On Wed, 8 Dec 2010 17:34:24 +0100, Florian Mickler
> wrote:
> > Does that mean that the kernel regression will not be
> > fixed/worked-around for old userspace?
>
> I think there is some confusion in that I believe there is more than o
On Wed, 8 Dec 2010 17:34:24 +0100, Florian Mickler wrote:
> Does that mean that the kernel regression will not be
> fixed/worked-around for old userspace?
I think there is some confusion in that I believe there is more than one
backlight bug at play here.
-Chris
--
Chris Wilson, Intel Open Sou
On Wednesday 08 December 2010 18:54:21 Chris Wilson wrote:
> On Wed, 8 Dec 2010 18:44:41 +0200, Vasily Khoruzhick
wrote:
> > On Wednesday 08 December 2010 18:24:35 Chris Wilson wrote:
> > > This is just a preliminary attempt to see if this even helps. Obviously
> > > some more effort will need to
On Wed, 8 Dec 2010 18:44:41 +0200, Vasily Khoruzhick wrote:
> On Wednesday 08 December 2010 18:24:35 Chris Wilson wrote:
> > This is just a preliminary attempt to see if this even helps. Obviously
> > some more effort will need to be spent investigating a better choice of
> > latency and when we n
On Wednesday 08 December 2010 18:24:35 Chris Wilson wrote:
> This is just a preliminary attempt to see if this even helps. Obviously
> some more effort will need to be spent investigating a better choice of
> latency and when we need to request it, but first: does this help?
Sorry, but it does not
On Sun, 05 Dec 2010 13:08:18 -0800
Keith Packard wrote:
> On Sun, 5 Dec 2010 13:27:43 +0100, Florian Mickler
> wrote:
> > On Fri, 26 Nov 2010 10:45:59 -0800
> > Keith Packard wrote:
> >
> > > In order to correctly report monitor connected status changes, the
> > > previous monitor status must
This is just a preliminary attempt to see if this even helps. Obviously
some more effort will need to be spent investigating a better choice of
latency and when we need to request it, but first: does this help?
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h |2 ++
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display
18 matches
Mail list logo
