On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 12:00 PM, Vasily Khoruzhick <anars...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Wednesday 08 December 2010 18:54:21 Chris Wilson wrote: >> On Wed, 8 Dec 2010 18:44:41 +0200, Vasily Khoruzhick <anars...@gmail.com> > wrote: >> > On Wednesday 08 December 2010 18:24:35 Chris Wilson wrote: >> > > This is just a preliminary attempt to see if this even helps. Obviously >> > > some more effort will need to be spent investigating a better choice of >> > > latency and when we need to request it, but first: does this help? >> > >> > Sorry, but it does not. glxgears is still jerky.
Do you have the 2.6.36.2 candidate patch that fixes pm_qos in? From the description, it looks like pm_qos doesn't work at all without it. --Andy >> >> I thought we were trying to fix the reported framerate? > > Yep, it reports 20-30 instead of 60 > >> Try adjusting the >> request max latency down from 20 to 1, or even 0. > > Will try. > > Regards > Vasily > _______________________________________________ > Intel-gfx mailing list > Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org > http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx > _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
