This is just a preliminary attempt to see if this even helps. Obviously
some more effort will need to be spent investigating a better choice of
latency and when we need to request it, but first: does this help?
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h | 2 ++
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c | 8 ++++++++
2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
index d9b54a2..4675f6d 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
@@ -35,6 +35,7 @@
#include "intel_ringbuffer.h"
#include <linux/io-mapping.h>
#include <linux/i2c.h>
+#include <linux/pm_qos_params.h>
#include <drm/intel-gtt.h>
/* General customization:
@@ -659,6 +660,7 @@ typedef struct drm_i915_private {
int lvds_downclock;
struct work_struct idle_work;
struct timer_list idle_timer;
+ struct pm_qos_request_list pm_qos;
bool busy;
u16 orig_clock;
int child_dev_num;
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
index e213529..128020a 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
@@ -4765,6 +4765,8 @@ static void intel_gpu_idle_timer(unsigned long arg)
return;
}
+ pm_qos_remove_request(&dev_priv->pm_qos);
+
dev_priv->busy = false;
queue_work(dev_priv->wq, &dev_priv->idle_work);
}
@@ -4940,6 +4942,12 @@ void intel_mark_busy(struct drm_device *dev, struct
drm_i915_gem_object *obj)
fw_blc_self &= ~FW_BLC_SELF_EN;
I915_WRITE(FW_BLC_SELF, fw_blc_self |
FW_BLC_SELF_EN_MASK);
}
+
+ /* Install a handle to prevent C-state starvation of the GPU */
+ pm_qos_add_request(&dev_priv->pm_qos,
+ PM_QOS_CPU_DMA_LATENCY,
+ 20);
+
dev_priv->busy = true;
} else
mod_timer(&dev_priv->idle_timer, jiffies +
--
1.7.2.3
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
