Luigi, Yihao, all,
Thanks for initiating this work. For some comments, please see inline.
Best,
Dirk
From: Int-area [mailto:int-area-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Luigi Iannone
Sent: 18 November 2020 07:39
To: Jiayihao (Network, 2012 Lab)
Cc: Yanshen (2012 NGIP) ; Dangjuanna
; Chenzhe (Z) ;
Stewart, all,
As Yihao pointed out, we are working on an update to the draft to focus the
discussion on the communication scenarios and problems arising in those
scenarios. In that sense, we agree with your desire for a holistic discussion
and see this upcoming update as one of the next towards
Stewart, all,
You may have noticed that we did submit the mentioned update to the draft,
available at
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-jia-intarea-scenarios-problems-addressing/.
I hope this addresses a few points discussed so far.
Best,
Dirk
From: Dirk Trossen
Sent: 05 February 2021
Hi Chathura,
Interesting draft, indeed, to start a discussion here on this list. Adrian's
responded with a piece I'd also recommended, namely the SARAH list, where this
contribution may well contribute to possible discussions on addressing and
routing aspects related to the Tactile Internet.
Hi Chathura,
Please see inline. I'm also CCing the SARAH list where some members may have
comments on this draft, too.
Best,
Dirk
-Original Message-
From: Chathura Sarathchandra [mailto:chathura.sarathchan...@interdigital.com]
Sent: 28 June 2021 18:26
To: Dirk Trossen ; int
Dear all,
As a follow-up from the int-area meeting on 31st of July, we would like to
solicit comments and feedback on the Internet addressing problem statement and
gap analysis drafts
(https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-jia-intarea-scenarios-problems-addressing/
and
https://datatracker.ie
Dear all,
You may have seen the update to our drafts on problem statement and gap
analysis for Internet addressing, to be found at
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-jia-intarea-scenarios-problems-addressing/
and
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-jia-intarea-internet-addressing-gap-an
Hi Alex,
Indeed, the side meeting you refer to is more specifically discussing the
evolution of Internet addressing, tying into the current drafts submitted to
the INT area WG (the side meeting is meant to stimulate discussion on those
drafts). We have asked Vasileios from CloudFlare to join th
Hi Dino & Michael,
Thanks for kicking off the discussion. We showed our main points and take-away
at the INT area WG meeting just now.
On your point of
> The side meeting was focus on bottom-up and that always results in no one
> wanting the solution. I think Luigi/Dirk wanted this discussion
Dear all,
Many thanks for those participating in the side meeting on Internet addressing
during the IETF 112 week. As suggested during the meeting, we want to take
various points of discussion during the meeting onto the mailing list to
continue discussion here on possible ways forward.
Specif
?
More inline.
Best,
Dirk
-Original Message-
From: Dino Farinacci [mailto:farina...@gmail.com]
Sent: 01 December 2021 23:18
To: Dirk Trossen
Cc: int-area@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Int-area] Side meeting follow-up: What exact features do we want
from the Internet?
Here's my single fe
in (US), Fred L [mailto:fred.l.temp...@boeing.com]
Sent: 01 December 2021 23:28
To: Dino Farinacci ; Dirk Trossen
Cc: int-area@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Int-area] Side meeting follow-up: What exact features do we want
from the Internet?
My input is that we will want the "6 M's of Modern
-
From: Dino Farinacci [mailto:farina...@gmail.com]
Sent: 02 December 2021 20:01
To: Dirk Trossen
Cc: int-area@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Int-area] Side meeting follow-up: What exact features do we want
from the Internet?
> Many thanks for the reply. Let me tie this back to my question regard
Jumping into this late (due to a few days off), see inline.
-Original Message-
From: Int-area [mailto:int-area-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Brian E Carpenter
Sent: 18 December 2021 20:51
To: Stewart Bryant ; Geoff Huston
Cc: Int-area@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Int-area] Where/How is the fea
Just as a thought: how much is this discussion led by the use of Internet
technologies for the public Internet vs use of Internet technologies for
non-public use or limited domains (or even something we may consider future
versions of the 'public internet')? In other words, is this trend to
cen
Brian,.
See inline.
Dirk
-Original Message-
From: Brian E Carpenter [mailto:brian.e.carpen...@gmail.com]
Sent: 20 December 2021 21:03
To: Dirk Trossen ; Stewart Bryant
; Geoff Huston
Cc: Int-area@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Int-area] Where/How is the features innovation happening?
On 20
All,
Thanks for the great discussion, following our side meeting at IETF 112, so far.
I wanted to turn the discussion to a key question which not only arose in the
side meeting already but also in the discussions since, namely "what is an
address anyway?".
It seems that any answer would very m
riginal Message-
From: Geoff Huston [mailto:g...@apnic.net]
Sent: 25 January 2022 20:42
To: Stewart Bryant
Cc: int-area@ietf.org; Dirk Trossen
Subject: Re: [Int-area] Continuing the addressing discussion: what is an
address anyway?
> On 26 Jan 2022, at 5:47 am, Stewart Bryant wrote:
&
Apologies, the below should read " then the question arises how much of an
ephemeral nature we see in the relations between a client and an egress ", of
course.
-Original Message-----
From: Dirk Trossen
Sent: 26 January 2022 10:21
To: 'Geoff Huston' ; Stewart Bryant
C
Hi Geoff,
Thanks for the thoughts below, which is much aligned with previous interactions
on the development of the current Internet. Please see inline.
Best,
Dirk
-Original Message-
From: Int-area [mailto:int-area-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Geoff Huston
Sent: 26 January 2022 20:35
Hi Zongpeng,
Thanks for pointing out the draft again (I couldn't attend the full INTArea
meeting last week due to conflicts with other meetings).
Let me try to summarize the proposed mechanism, hoping I understood it right:
you are proposing to use the lower 128bit for identifying a service IP
Hi Zongpeng,
Thanks for the answers. Please see inline.
Best,
Dirk
From: duzongp...@foxmail.com
Sent: 02 August 2022 11:36
To: Dirk Trossen ; Int-area
Subject: Re: RE: [Int-area] Call for comments of the draft Service Routing in
MEC
Hi, Dirk
Thanks for the reply.
Please see in
Hi John,
Thanks for the comments. Please see inline.
Best,
Dirk
-Original Message-
From: Int-area On Behalf Of John Gilmore
Sent: 30 November 2022 03:16
To: Luigi Iannone
Cc: int-area ; g...@toad.com
Subject: Re: [Int-area] whither multicast?
> https://arxiv.org/pdf/2211.09029.pdf
T
All,
Chiming in here from my travel to the IETF.
At the upcoming Friday meeting of the RTG WG, there will also be a presentation
of the Routing on Service Addresses (ROSA) draft
(https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-trossen-rtgwg-rosa). Given the
emphasis on the routing aspect, this has
24 matches
Mail list logo