Hi James,
Quoting "James B. Byrne via Info-cyrus" :
We are transferring an existing cyrus-imapd 3.0.11 mailstore to
another host also running cyrus-imapd 3.0.11. I cannot find any
documentation on how one transfers user quotas. Can someone provide
me with the link to the docume
We are transferring an existing cyrus-imapd 3.0.11 mailstore to
another host also running cyrus-imapd 3.0.11. I cannot find any
documentation on how one transfers user quotas. Can someone provide
me with the link to the documentation or explain how it is done?
Thanks,
--
*** e-Mail
When you say ‘delete’ do you mean a client software that may actually be moving
the messages to a Trash folder?
This could have the effect you mention …
M
--
Merlin Hartley
Computer Officer
MRC Mitochondrial Biology Unit
University of Cambridge
Cambridge, CB2 0XY
United Kingdom
> On 7 Nov 2018,
Le 07/11/2018 à 08:52:20-0500, James B. Byrne via Info-cyrus a écrit
> Cyrus-IMAPD-3.0.7 on FreeBSD-11.2p4
>
> We have users who, having deleted email, evidently do not recover the
> quota allocated to those messages. We do not believe that we have
Well...I don't think so. With my configuration (
Cyrus-IMAPD-3.0.7 on FreeBSD-11.2p4
We have users who, having deleted email, evidently do not recover the
quota allocated to those messages. We do not believe that we have
enabled delayed deletion. All the user mailboxes previous had been
upgraded using:
sudo -u cyrus /usr/local/cyrus/sbin/reco
>> Thanks a lot, but I know IMAP :-)
> >> I can't do anything on the client side. For mailboxes that don't change
> and
> >> don't have any \Deleted flag I would like to change on the server side
> any
> >> CLOSE by UNSELECT
> >
> > So upgrade to 2.4.x, it's fixed there. It was a massive amount of
On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 10:09:43AM +0100, Sébastien Michel wrote:
> > I expect that cyrus.index and cyrus.cache don't change if the client does
> nothing in the IMAP session, even after a SELECT.
> The same test in an empty mailbox has the same result, Generation Number is
> incremented too.
Cyrus
Thanks a lot for the tip, I didn't know this tool.
Sébastien
2010/11/22 Gabor Gombas
> On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 11:03:15AM +0100, Sébastien Michel wrote:
>
> > Since strace doesn't help to see what mmap reads on SELECT, so I made a
> test
> > on NFS server.
>
> On Linux you should use blktrace.
> tarball. Just sending a mail in LMTP and opening the mailbox several times
> > (SELECT/CLOSE only)
> > A binary diff indicated that Generation Number is incremented but nothing
> > else.
>
> > Oh yeah - expunge on close. God, that's awful. 2.4.x will fix that.
> > Switching filehandles to read-
On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 03:36:07PM +0100, Sébastien Michel wrote:
> > > You have got to be kidding me. Unless there's actually something which
> > > requires the files to be rewritten (i.e. an expunge event) then this
> > > should not happen. Again, Cyrus 2.4.x will be much more efficient in
> >
On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 11:03:15AM +0100, Sébastien Michel wrote:
> Since strace doesn't help to see what mmap reads on SELECT, so I made a test
> on NFS server.
On Linux you should use blktrace. NFS is a non-POSIX filesystem, and it
may show quite different behavior compared to a POSIX filesyste
On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 03:36:07PM +0100, Sébastien Michel wrote:
> > > You have got to be kidding me. Unless there's actually something which
> > > requires the files to be rewritten (i.e. an expunge event) then this
> > > should not happen. Again, Cyrus 2.4.x will be much more efficient in
> >
> > You have got to be kidding me. Unless there's actually something which
> > requires the files to be rewritten (i.e. an expunge event) then this
> > should not happen. Again, Cyrus 2.4.x will be much more efficient in
> > this regard, only rewriting if you have explicitly enable immediate
> >
Le 19 nov. 2010 à 17:48, Michel Sébastien a écrit :
> Is mmap still efficient ? map a gigabit file should cost a lot of I/O and a
> relatively long reponse time to just access the records of the most recent
> emails.
mmap does nothing besides mapping the file as virtual memory to your process
On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 11:03:15AM +0100, Sébastien Michel wrote:
> > To be honest - it doesn't actually hurt too badly once it's in memory
> > > cache. The cyrus.cache file isn't generally needed to be entirely
> > > read, and the secret of mmap is that you only read the bits you need
> > > as yo
> To be honest - it doesn't actually hurt too badly once it's in memory
> > cache. The cyrus.cache file isn't generally needed to be entirely
> > read, and the secret of mmap is that you only read the bits you need
> > as you need them - it's lazily loaded.
>
> I am fully agree with you. But I don
Adam Tauno Williams wrote:
> I think the issue you will encounter first is clients will start to fall
> down when folders exceed a 'reasonable' number of messages. Common IMAP
> clients I've seen start to exhibit severe performance issues beyond a
> few hundred thousand messages.
>
Older versio
On Fri, Nov 19, 2010 at 05:48:22PM +0100, Michel Sébastien wrote:
>
> > Our biggest currently is about 30GB I think.
>
> >> I think the issue you will encounter first is clients will start to fall
> >> down when folders exceed a 'reasonable' number of messages. Common IMAP
> >> clients I've seen
On Fri, 19 Nov 2010, Michel Sébastien wrote:
On a 32 bit architecture: we had one folder with over a million messages
which was causing processes to run out of virtual memory trying to map
the cache file in. This wouldn't be a problem with a 64 bit userland.
very impressive to have so much me
> Our biggest currently is about 30GB I think.
>> I think the issue you will encounter first is clients will start to fall
>> down when folders exceed a 'reasonable' number of messages. Common IMAP
>> clients I've seen start to exhibit severe performance issues beyond a
>> few hundred thousand m
> > > anyone out there who allows unlimited quota for their users or provides
> > > extremely large quotas when asked for?
> > > If so, can you describe any problems you've had with this?
> > We have users with > 5 GB.
>
> Our largest quota'
Hi,
On Tue, 16 Nov 2010, Adam Tauno Williams wrote:
> I think the issue you will encounter first is clients will start to fall
> down when folders exceed a 'reasonable' number of messages. Common IMAP
> clients I've seen start to exhibit severe performance issues beyond a
> few hundred thousand
On Tuesday, November 16, 2010 02:53:44 pm Simon Amor wrote:
> On 16 Nov 2010, at 13:38, Adam Tauno Williams wrote:
> > Our largest quota's a 4GB; without any issues.
> >
> > I think the issue you will encounter first is clients will start to
> > fall
> > down when folders exceed a 'reasonable' num
We use ext4 for more than one year now. Efficient and stable. A good choise
12 spool of 250GB over 10 FC disks using metalun.
Dom
2010/11/16 Robert Mueller
>
> > > This is depends on what filesystem you are useing, I have mailboxes
> with hundreds
> > > of thousands of messages in them on XFS a
Am 16.11.10 19:08, schrieb Wesley Craig:
> On 16 Nov 2010, at 10:32, Joseph Brennan wrote:
>> I wish we'd somehow financed a native Cyrus webmail interface, that is
>> not using IMAP but built into Cyrus. I don't think users know how good
>> Cyrus is because they look at it through a weak intermed
> On 16 Nov 2010, at 10:32, Joseph Brennan wrote:
> > I wish we'd somehow financed a native Cyrus webmail interface, that is
> > not using IMAP but built into Cyrus. I don't think users know how good
> > Cyrus is because they look at it through a weak intermediary.
>
> I don't think a Cyrus-speci
> On 16.11.2010 17:11, Shuvam Misra wrote:
> > I guess Webmail is OT on a Cyrus mailing list, but can't help asking: any
> > suggestions for
> > improving Webmail performance? (Admission: we haven't yet tried imapproxy
> > -- it appears to be a good piece of C which will help things.)
>
> You sho
> > This is depends on what filesystem you are useing, I have mailboxes with
> > hundreds
> > of thousands of messages in them on XFS and have no problems, but on ext3 I
> > start seeing slowdowns with a bit over ten thousand messages.
>
> Was dir_index enabled on that ext3 filesystem? Prior
> > > anyone out there who allows unlimited quota for their users or provides
> > > extremely large quotas when asked for?
> > > If so, can you describe any problems you've had with this?
> > We have users with > 5 GB.
>
> Our largest quota's a 4G
On Tue, 16 Nov 2010, Adam Tauno Williams wrote:
> On Tue, 2010-11-16 at 11:25 -0800, David Lang wrote:
>>> I don't actually know what sort of problems I'm referring to, hence the
>>> question. The big problem I can imagine would be opendir() and
>>> readdir() with a huge number of files in a dire
On Tue, 2010-11-16 at 11:25 -0800, David Lang wrote:
> > I don't actually know what sort of problems I'm referring to, hence the
> > question. The big problem I can imagine would be opendir() and
> > readdir() with a huge number of files in a directory, but the cyrus code
> > doesn't appear to do
On Tue, 16 Nov 2010, Ciprian wrote:
> Adam Tauno Williams wrote:
>> I think the issue you will encounter first is clients will start to fall
>> down when folders exceed a 'reasonable' number of messages. Common IMAP
>> clients I've seen start to exhibit severe performance issues beyond a
>> few h
allow unlimited or extremely large quotas?
> Date: Tue, 16 Nov 2010 07:06:53 -0500
> From: Dave McMurtrie
> To: Rob Mueller
>
> On 11/16/2010 06:45 AM, Rob Mueller wrote:
>>
>>> This may be slightly off-topic, so apologies in advance. Is there
>>> anyo
> Didn't Dave write up.imapproxy? It makes a huge difference for, e.g.,
> IMP & roundcube. Also, configuring client to not retrieve the LIST of
> mailboxes during every transaction is a big win.
Thanks a lot -- will definitely incorporate it into our setup. How does
one configure the client not
On 16 Nov 2010, at 10:32, Joseph Brennan wrote:
> I wish we'd somehow financed a native Cyrus webmail interface, that is
> not using IMAP but built into Cyrus. I don't think users know how good
> Cyrus is because they look at it through a weak intermediary.
I don't think a Cyrus-specific web inte
On 16.11.2010 17:11, Shuvam Misra wrote:
> I guess Webmail is OT on a Cyrus mailing list, but can't help asking: any
> suggestions for
> improving Webmail performance? (Admission: we haven't yet tried imapproxy
> -- it appears to be a good piece of C which will help things.)
You should install im
> > We find that Webmail chokes server performance much earlier than normal
> > IMAP clients do. I know this has nothing to do with Cyrus, but I just
> > thought I'd mention it. Most programming environments in which such
> > Webmail thingies are written (mostly PHP on the server and nowadays
> > l
On 11/16/2010 10:36 AM, Wesley Craig wrote:
> Didn't Dave write up.imapproxy? It makes a huge difference for, e.g., IMP&
> roundcube. Also, configuring client to not retrieve the LIST of mailboxes
> during every transaction is a big win.
Coincidentally, yes I did originally write that :)
Didn't Dave write up.imapproxy? It makes a huge difference for, e.g., IMP &
roundcube. Also, configuring client to not retrieve the LIST of mailboxes
during every transaction is a big win.
:wes
On 16 Nov 2010, at 10:11, Shuvam Misra wrote:
> Most programming environments in which such
> Webm
On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 08:41:46PM +0530, Shuvam Misra wrote:
> > > I think the issue you will encounter first is clients will start to fall
> > > down when folders exceed a 'reasonable' number of messages. Common IMAP
> > > clients I've seen start to exhibit severe performance issues beyond a
> >
> We know things will be fine with 10,000 messages too, but
> 100,000 msgs in a folder is pushing things.
My inbox is 17,338 at the moment, and it's still fast. But I'm using
an old copy of Mulberry, which was designed for IMAP.
The problem area is clients designed for POP and adapted to IMAP.
> > I think the issue you will encounter first is clients will start to fall
> > down when folders exceed a 'reasonable' number of messages. Common IMAP
> > clients I've seen start to exhibit severe performance issues beyond a
> > few hundred thousand messages.
>
> As far as I'm aware (the helpde
n a lot of places that would matter to a user
>> (deleting an entire folder, delete sieve scripts, etc) in the course of
>> normal operations.
>
> The number of files in a directory certainly seems to be the performance
> factor for us. We don't enforce quotas, but our l
On 16 Nov 2010, at 13:38, Adam Tauno Williams wrote:
>
> Our largest quota's a 4GB; without any issues.
>
> I think the issue you will encounter first is clients will start to
> fall
> down when folders exceed a 'reasonable' number of messages. Common
> IMAP
> clients I've seen start to exhib
gt; > anyone out there who allows unlimited quota for their users or provides
> > > extremely large quotas when asked for?
> > > If so, can you describe any problems you've had with this?
> > We have users with > 5 GB.
>
> Our largest quota's a 4GB; with
On Tue, 2010-11-16 at 14:12 +0100, Rudy Gevaert wrote:
> On 11/16/2010 12:30 PM, Dave McMurtrie wrote:
> > Good morning,
> > This may be slightly off-topic, so apologies in advance. Is there
> > anyone out there who allows unlimited quota for their users or provides
>
that would matter to a user
> (deleting an entire folder, delete sieve scripts, etc) in the course of
> normal operations.
The number of files in a directory certainly seems to be the performance
factor for us. We don't enforce quotas, but our largest mailboxes are
only about 15Gb. Deleting
On 11/16/2010 12:30 PM, Dave McMurtrie wrote:
> Good morning,
>
> This may be slightly off-topic, so apologies in advance. Is there
> anyone out there who allows unlimited quota for their users or provides
> extremely large quotas when asked for?
>
> If so, can you describ
I didn't realize that I only responded to Rob here. Perhaps my
additional information will shed some light on the kind of information
I'm looking for.
Original Message
Subject: Re: Does anyone allow unlimited or extremely large quotas?
Date: Tue, 16 Nov 2010 07:0
> On 11/16/2010 06:45 AM, Gavin McCullagh wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Tue, 16 Nov 2010, Dave McMurtrie wrote:
>>
>>> This may be slightly off-topic, so apologies in advance. Is there
>>> anyone out there who allows unlimited quota for their users or provi
On 11/16/2010 06:45 AM, Gavin McCullagh wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, 16 Nov 2010, Dave McMurtrie wrote:
>
>> This may be slightly off-topic, so apologies in advance. Is there
>> anyone out there who allows unlimited quota for their users or provides
>> extremely large q
Hi,
On Tue, 16 Nov 2010, Dave McMurtrie wrote:
> This may be slightly off-topic, so apologies in advance. Is there
> anyone out there who allows unlimited quota for their users or provides
> extremely large quotas when asked for?
What do you regard as extremely large? 10GB, 1
Good morning,
This may be slightly off-topic, so apologies in advance. Is there
anyone out there who allows unlimited quota for their users or provides
extremely large quotas when asked for?
If so, can you describe any problems you've had with this?
Thanks,
Dave
Cyrus Home Page:
Michael,
I don't know how to disable quota for all user but you can set the quota
to -1 or none per user
this will give no quota for that user.
Edwin.
Michael Glad schreef:
> It seems that I've accidentially enabled IMAP quotas on one of my cyrus
> servers -- users compla
It seems that I've accidentially enabled IMAP quotas on one of my cyrus
servers -- users complain
that saving mails into certain folders fails with an 'over quota' message.
There's indeed a file in the quota directory:
bash-3.2$ cat /var/lib/imap/quota/u/user
226215
0
On Fri, January 15, 2010 9:50 am, Michael Menge wrote:
> Quoting Eric Luyten :
>> On our previous Cyrus server (2.2 on Solaris 9 with UFS) I detected several
>> multiply-linked message files (sitting in different folders/directories).
>>
>> Those will be counted twice/thrice/... towards the Cyru
Quoting Eric Luyten :
On Thu, January 14, 2010 8:26 pm, Wil Cooley wrote:
Adam Tauno Williams wrote:
Some earlier versions of Cyrus had quota calculation issues with big
quotas (2GB? 4GB?) or big mailboxes. I think there is a blurb in WMOGAG
about that, and what version fixed it.
It
On Thu, January 14, 2010 8:26 pm, Wil Cooley wrote:
> Adam Tauno Williams wrote:
>
>
>> Some earlier versions of Cyrus had quota calculation issues with big
>> quotas (2GB? 4GB?) or big mailboxes. I think there is a blurb in WMOGAG
>> about that, and what version fixed
Adam Tauno Williams wrote:
> Some earlier versions of Cyrus had quota calculation issues with big
> quotas (2GB? 4GB?) or big mailboxes. I think there is a blurb in WMOGAG
> about that, and what version fixed it.
It happens with 2.2 crossing the 4GiB range, but not related to what he&
Thanks for your quick reply.
On 01/14/10 01:32 PM, Adam Tauno Williams wrote:
> On Thu, 2010-01-14 at 13:25 -0500, Robert Wirstrom wrote:
>> We are running Cyrus 2.3.15 on Solaris 10 and recently started enabling
>> quotas for around 100 users. Certain user accounts s
On Thu, 2010-01-14 at 13:25 -0500, Robert Wirstrom wrote:
> We are running Cyrus 2.3.15 on Solaris 10 and recently started enabling
> quotas for around 100 users. Certain user accounts show conflicting
> information based on the 'quota' command and how much space is taken up
Hi,
We are running Cyrus 2.3.15 on Solaris 10 and recently started enabling
quotas for around 100 users. Certain user accounts show conflicting
information based on the 'quota' command and how much space is taken up
by the filesystem ('du'). We have run 'quota -f' an
> Hello everyone,
>
> As it seems impossible to access users accounts of many domains in cyradm,
> As it seems impossible to change the quota of a user in another domain,
>
> I would like to know where is stored the quotas for a specific user
> account ?
>
> For
Hello everyone,
As it seems impossible to access users accounts of many domains in cyradm,
As it seems impossible to change the quota of a user in another domain,
I would like to know where is stored the quotas for a specific user
account ?
For example I have user dbuche...@mydomain3.com, with
at we were thinking of is disabling quotas on the servers we're
moving to, so that this problem is mitigated and our moves can continue
at a good pace. Currently we've just been sticking to a single batch
script that only does one "xfer" at a time, as that seems to avoid any
hello everybody!
i am testing the replicated config of murder but i can't see how to replicate
quotas info. it is posible?
regards.
Cyrus Home Page: http://cyrusimap.web.cmu.edu/
Cyrus Wiki/FAQ: http://cyrusimap.web.cmu.edu/twiki
List Archives/Info: http://asg.web.cmu.edu/cyrus/ma
Hi,
i want to ask is there some way to solve the problem with users that
have over-quota in their mailboxes. I'm not sure if they delete there
messages with purge delete or not. I suppuse if they don't delete the
messages then mailbox going to be over quota. Is there some way to
understand if some
Aleksandr Stankevic wrote:
Hi there on this list too,
I think oreilly's "managing imap" has a public chapter on managing cyrus
which could be useful.
You can find it here: http://www.oreilly.com/catalog/mimap/chapter/ch09.html
Hi List
I have the notes for cyrus/imap set q
Hi there on this list too,
I think oreilly's "managing imap" has a public chapter on managing cyrus
which could be useful.
You can find it here: http://www.oreilly.com/catalog/mimap/chapter/ch09.html
> Hi List
>
> I have the notes for cyrus/imap set quotas so
Hi List
I have the notes for cyrus/imap set quotas something like this from a
previous employer.
Thus I would like clarificartion or url to a good tutorial or howto.
Use /cyradm/ to set quota to 50mb
localhost> setquota user.joey 50.000 quota:5.000
localhost> lq use
e of something over 10MB
>> now and doesn´t accept any mail. the messages aren´t delivered and
>> deferred now. so i think there is a way cyrus talks to postfix about
>> per-user quotas.
>
> I don't know what setting a quota in postfix does... You can view the
> quo
rus, delay=1, status=deferred
(temporary failure)
...
in one of the mailinglist archives i read sth about the error codes. my
problem is that the message is not bounced and so the sender is not
notified. it is stuck somewhere in the postfix-queue.
i have virtual users and domains and i´m using per-user q
. so i think there is a way cyrus talks to postfix about
per-user quotas.
I don't know what setting a quota in postfix does... You can view the
quota in Cyrus by running cyradm and executing the command "lq
user.".
Andy
Cyrus Home Page: http://cyrusimap.web.cmu.edu/
about
per-user quotas.
Andrew Morgan wrote:
> On Tue, 13 Mar 2007, Philippe Trolliet wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>> in the log i see following message:
>> ...
>> Mar 13 12:17:41 mail lmtpunix[10500]:
>> verify_user(novaware.de!user.p^trolliet) failed: Over quota
>&g
status=deferred
(temporary failure)
...
in one of the mailinglist archives i read sth about the error codes. my
problem is that the message is not bounced and so the sender is not
notified. it is stuck somewhere in the postfix-queue.
i have virtual users and domains and i´m using per-user quotas sto
of the mailinglist archives i read sth about the error codes. my
problem is that the message is not bounced and so the sender is not
notified. it is stuck somewhere in the postfix-queue.
i have virtual users and domains and i´m using per-user quotas stored in
a mysql-db. i can set the quota for every
Hi
what do you mean with per-user quotas?
Cyrus has its own quota system, where you can set the quota for each user,
or even on subfolders. In case of quota exceeding cyrus will reject the
message in the lmtp protocol with a 4xx or a 5xx error, depending of
how you configure cyrus.
As far
hi,
i´m using postfix and cyrus-imapd with virtual users and domains. is it
possible to get imapd to work with per-user quotas? i saw that there are
some patches out there for postfix. but the developers of postfix recommend
filesystem quotas.
i´m asking this because dovecot has the ability to use
I tried to apply the patch for 2.2.12 to get quotas beyond 2 GiB, but it
doesn't apply very well. has anyone ported it to 2.2.13?
--
thanks,
Kjetil T.
Cyrus Home Page: http://cyrusimap.web.cmu.edu/
Cyrus Wiki/FAQ: http://cyrusimap.web.cmu.edu/twiki
List Archives/Info:
7;t know what your problem is but maybe you have to update
>> quota with "quota -f" after switching your mailspool to the 64bit quota
>> thing.
>
> Heh... Did I say what my problem is? :) No problem... no problem... I
> just
> wanted to know the definitive answer, whic
ching your mailspool to the 64bit quota
thing.
Heh... Did I say what my problem is? :) No problem... no problem... I just
wanted to know the definitive answer, which you guys gave me!
Does the large quota patch require a 64-bit machine/os in order to
permit quotas larger than 2GB?
No, it
m Ken earlier on suggesting something
> similar.
With 2.2 it was 2GB, with 2.3 it may be 2TB or something, just usually
large enough.
>
> In a nutshell, it looks like we can set quotas to any size (even larger
> than
> 4GB) because the quote limit is defined in Kilobytes and note b
he limit is
not 2GB,
but 2TB. I saw a posting from Ken earlier on suggesting something
similar.
In a nutshell, it looks like we can set quotas to any size (even
larger than
4GB) because the quote limit is defined in Kilobytes and note bytes.
However,
the real problem is the tracking of the a
e:
Okay, I would like to hear specifically from Ken on this one...
I asked the question myself and go an answer suggesting the limit is not
2GB,
but 2TB. I saw a posting from Ken earlier on suggesting something similar.
In a nutshell, it looks like we can set quotas to any size (even large
ething similar.
In a nutshell, it looks like we can set quotas to any size (even larger than
4GB) because the quote limit is defined in Kilobytes and note bytes. However,
the real problem is the tracking of the actual space used by the user, which
is done in bytes... so, even though you can set the
iver fails then:
>>>
>>> Mar 29 10:08:37 mail lmtpunix[2968]: verify_user(user.dietrich^habs)
>>> failed: Over quota
>>
>>
>> Only Cyrus 2.3 supports quotas of that size.
>>
>
> Is this on 32bit platform too? Or only on 64bit? Thanks in advance!
y_user(user.dietrich^habs)
failed: Over quota
Only Cyrus 2.3 supports quotas of that size.
Is this on 32bit platform too? Or only on 64bit? Thanks in advance!
Rudy
--
-- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --
Rudy Gevaert e-mail:
Am Mittwoch 29 März 2006 13:01 schrieb Simon Matter:
> > Only Cyrus 2.3 supports quotas of that size.
>
> Or my latest 2.2 rpms which are patched for it.
Thanks! I will try that.
Sincerly,
Klaus
--
Klaus Steinberger Maier-Leibnitz Labor
Phone: (+49 89)289 14287 Am Coul
tpunix[2968]: verify_user(user.dietrich^habs)
>> failed: Over quota
>
> Only Cyrus 2.3 supports quotas of that size.
Or my latest 2.2 rpms which are patched for it.
Cyrus Home Page: http://asg.web.cmu.edu/cyrus
Cyrus Wiki/FAQ: http://cyruswiki.andrew.cmu.edu
List Archives/Info: http://asg.web.cmu.edu/cyrus/mailing-list.html
failed: Over quota
Only Cyrus 2.3 supports quotas of that size.
--
.:.Sebastian Hagedorn - RZKR-R1 (Gebäude 52), Zimmer 18.:.
Zentrum für angewandte Informatik - Universitätsweiter Service RRZK
.:.Universität zu Köln / Cologne University - Tel. +49-221-478-5587.:.
.:.:.:
Klaus Steinberger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I have trouble with a power user mailbox, which currently runs near at
> 4GByte.
> I bumped up the quota to 6 Gbyte, but deliver fails then:
Yes.
https://bugzilla.andrew.cmu.edu/show_bug.cgi?id=2690
Darrell
Cyrus Home Page: http://asg.web.
Hello,
I have trouble with a power user mailbox, which currently runs near at 4GByte.
I bumped up the quota to 6 Gbyte, but deliver fails then:
Mar 29 10:08:37 mail lmtpunix[2968]: verify_user(user.dietrich^habs) failed:
Over quota
cyrus-admin shows the following:
localhost.localdomain> lq us
Hello,
I'm running into a "strange" problems using quotas under Cyrus
2.2 (haven't tried 2.3 yet).
I'm using virtual domains and I've defined domain-wise quota, like
sq @domain.tld 10
and under @domain.tld, I have certain users who have quotas too, like
sq u
Aristotelis wrote:
As Simon already said the quota removal works a bit differently in
cyrus imap.
Just a bit. I think what drives Net_IMAP_Protocol() from php pear crazy
is the difference in response for GETQUOTA.
If no quota db exists for a mail box then this is what cyrus says:
C: GETQUOT
I have ported the rmquota patch to 2.3.1 and it's included in the RPM.
Removing quota works as described on the rmquota webpage.
Simon
So probably he doesn't use it. (If i remember the first post
correctly he is using cyrusadm, and not the rmquota option through imap).
I'll try to have a
Simon Matter wrote:
At least with quotalegacy you can do it the dirty way by simply removing
the quota file for the user.
If I didn't this wouldn't I also have to run reconstruct on the mailbox?
--
Scott Russell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
IBM Linux Technology Center System Admin
Cyrus Home Page
Simon Matter wrote:
From what I understand everything is okay here. For user.scottrus only the
size of the mailbox is shown, no quota is shown because it is set to -1 in
the quota db. I think the problem is that the quota file (assuming you are
using quota legacy db) is not removed when setting q
> Scott Russell wrote:
>> Greets.
>>
>> I'm having problems removing quotas in Cyrus 2.3.1. I'm using Simon's
>> 2.3.1-2 RPM. It looks like the command attempts to remove the mailbox
>> quota but instead ends up doing something else. What I'
Scott Russell wrote:
Greets.
I'm having problems removing quotas in Cyrus 2.3.1. I'm using Simon's
2.3.1-2 RPM. It looks like the command attempts to remove the mailbox
quota but instead ends up doing something else. What I'm not sure of so
lots of logs and details provi
> Hi Scott,
>
> --On 13. Februar 2006 17:07:16 -0500 Scott Russell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
>> Using cyradm I look at the existing quota for user.scottrus, remove it,
>> then look at it again.
>>
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] users]# cyradm --user cyrus localhost
>>> Password:
>> >
>>> localhost.loc
1 - 100 of 221 matches
Mail list logo
