Quoting azurIt :
Hi,
is it, somehow, possible to directly include images in HTML message?
For example in HTML signature. I'm not talking about links to
external server but about including entire image in message (it can
be, for example, attached but directly displayed in message). Thnks.
> Od: "Luis Felipe Marzagao"
> Komu: azurIt
> Dátum: 21.01.2013 23:54
> Predmet: Re: [imp] Images in message
>
> CC: "imp"
>On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 8:19 PM, azurIt wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> is it, somehow, possible to directly include images in HTML message? For
>> example in HTML signature. I'm not
On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 8:19 PM, azurIt wrote:
> Hi,
>
> is it, somehow, possible to directly include images in HTML message? For
> example in HTML signature. I'm not talking about links to external server but
> about including entire image in message (it can be, for example, attached but
> dir
On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 7:50 PM, Ralf Lang wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Am 21.01.2013 22:37, schrieb Luis Felipe Marzagao:
>> On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 5:38 PM, Ralf Lang
>> wrote: I think your main idea in previous discussions was "use
>> templates/drafts, not ident
Hi,
is it, somehow, possible to directly include images in HTML message? For
example in HTML signature. I'm not talking about links to external server but
about including entire image in message (it can be, for example, attached but
directly displayed in message). Thnks.
azur
--
imp mailing l
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Am 21.01.2013 22:37, schrieb Luis Felipe Marzagao:
> On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 5:38 PM, Ralf Lang
> wrote: I think your main idea in previous discussions was "use
> templates/drafts, not identities/signatures". I'll try that. Let's
> see how it works o
On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 5:38 PM, Ralf Lang wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> I think your main idea in previous discussions was "use
> templates/drafts, not identities/signatures". I'll try that. Let's see
> how it works out and disarm a little bit. Let's not play Lennar
On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 5:33 PM, Michael M Slusarz wrote:
> Quoting Luis Felipe Marzagao :
>
>> As an alternative, I have proposed at least just the *displaying* of the
>> signature (i. e., in another frame or something like that), which does not
>> seem a hard task to accomplish (I mean, pull the
On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 5:13 PM, Michael M Slusarz wrote:
> Quoting Luis Felipe Marzagao :
>
>> I also think wrinting a msg and not seeing what will be the final text is
>> really confusing and nonintuitive, mainly for real life/regular users, but
>> since this is open source software, at least yo
Zitat von Simon Brereton :
On Jan 21, 2013 2:13 PM, "Michael M Slusarz" wrote:
Quoting Luis Felipe Marzagao :
I also think wrinting a msg and not seeing what will be the final text
is really confusing and nonintuitive, mainly for real life/regular users,
but since this is open source soft
Quoting Ralf Lang :
I understand the arguments for and against showing/editing signatures.
Still I do not find it very intuitive and when H5 goes into production
this month, I am sure users will ask for patches to at least see the
signature.
To summarize dozens of previous posts why signatures
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
> Comparing signature to the server trailer is completely wrong -
> these are two different things which share nothing.
Comparing is never wrong. It yields differences and identity.
Sometimes more the former, sometimes more the latter.
>
> Here are f
Hello,
I added two email fields to the Turba.
It works fine and the setup of the address book within IMP seems OK.
The SQL query produced by auto-completion for Turba address works fine
too (as the query executed manually on the MySQL database return
correctly the address book record).
The
On Jan 21, 2013 2:13 PM, "Michael M Slusarz" wrote:
>
> Quoting Luis Felipe Marzagao :
>
>> I also think wrinting a msg and not seeing what will be the final text
is really confusing and nonintuitive, mainly for real life/regular users,
but since this is open source software, at least you can alte
> Od: "Michael M Slusarz"
> Komu:
> Dátum: 21.01.2013 20:13
> Predmet: Re: [imp] Signature
>
>Quoting Luis Felipe Marzagao :
>
>> I also think wrinting a msg and not seeing what will be the final
>> text is really confusing and nonintuitive, mainly for real
>> life/regular users, but since th
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
> NO MUA THAT I HAVE EVER SEEN "GUARANTEES" THAT WHAT YOU "SEE" IN
> THE COMPOSE WINDOW IS ACTUALLY WHAT IS SENT OUT.
Haven't seen such either.
> An admin can add a trailer to every message which cannot be altered
> by the user and will never be seen
Quoting Luis Felipe Marzagao :
As an alternative, I have proposed at least just the *displaying* of
the signature (i. e., in another frame or something like that),
which does not seem a hard task to accomplish (I mean, pull the
signature text from db backend when selecting the identity in t
Quoting Luis Felipe Marzagao :
I also think wrinting a msg and not seeing what will be the final
text is really confusing and nonintuitive, mainly for real
life/regular users, but since this is open source software, at least
you can alter the code. Imagine if it were proprietary/closed
so
Quoting azurIt :
Well, this is your opinion and other people (including me) may not
agree with it. I'm not going to argue with you and Jan but current
signature behavior is extremely non-standard (have you ever seen any
other e-mail client which was acting like this?) and lot's of our
cus
Em 21/01/2013 16:42, azurIt escreveu:
Od: "Michael M Slusarz"
Komu:
Dátum: 21.01.2013 19:29
Predmet: Re: [imp] Signature
Quoting azurIt :
Od: "Jan Schneider"
Komu:
Dátum: 21.01.2013 09:48
Predmet: Re: [imp] Signature
Zitat von azurIt :
Hi,
ia have two questions:
1.) Is it possible to
> Od: "Michael M Slusarz"
> Komu:
> Dátum: 21.01.2013 19:29
> Predmet: Re: [imp] Signature
>
>Quoting azurIt :
>
>>> Od: "Jan Schneider"
>>> Komu:
>>> Dátum: 21.01.2013 09:48
>>> Predmet: Re: [imp] Signature
>>>
>>> Zitat von azurIt :
>>>
Hi,
ia have two questions:
1.)
Quoting "Jens-U. Mozdzen" :
It'd be nice if I could set a per-recipient "default identity" to
use, so when I select a recipient from my address book, that
identity is pre-selected for me.
This is the exact purpose of tie-to addresses.
michael
___
Michael Sl
Quoting azurIt :
Od: "Jan Schneider"
Komu:
Dátum: 21.01.2013 09:48
Predmet: Re: [imp] Signature
Zitat von azurIt :
Hi,
ia have two questions:
1.) Is it possible to add signature right after the _my_ text in
IMP6 when replying to message? Standard behavior is to add it to the
end of messag
Hi *,
I'm looking for a way to associate a "default identity" with a
specific contact.
Background: As there is no way to edit signatures in IMP, not even a
visual feedback what the sig will be like, I always have to remember
to select the proper identity (with/without signature) when send
> Od: "Jan Schneider"
> Komu:
> Dátum: 21.01.2013 09:48
> Predmet: Re: [imp] Signature
>
>Zitat von azurIt :
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> ia have two questions:
>>
>> 1.) Is it possible to add signature right after the _my_ text in
>> IMP6 when replying to message? Standard behavior is to add it to the
>>
Zitat von azurIt :
Hi,
ia have two questions:
1.) Is it possible to add signature right after the _my_ text in
IMP6 when replying to message? Standard behavior is to add it to the
end of message (so after the quoted text).
2.) Is it possible to display signature in compose screen? Like i
26 matches
Mail list logo
