Re: [ilugd]: A matter of Ethics

2003-03-27 Thread Tarun Dua
On Fri, 2003-03-28 at 08:17, Sunil Dhaka thus thought: > > Hey, the moment you got IPTables in, there remained nothing ethical about > calling it proprietary..! > > Prateek, IMHO you hit the nail on the head. If there is a "clean separation" of the two softwares i.e. they haven't made any changes

Re: [ilugd]: A matter of Ethics

2003-03-27 Thread Sunil Dhaka
> Hey, the moment you got IPTables in, there remained nothing ethical about calling it proprietary..! Prateek, IMHO you hit the nail on the head. DaX To unsubscribe, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe in subject header. C

Re: [ilugd]: A matter of Ethics

2003-03-27 Thread Prateek Khanna
On Thu, 27 Mar 2003, Sunil Dhaka wrote: > Q: Is it ethical to call this bundle a proprietary FIREWALL? Hey, the moment you got IPTables in, there remained nothing ethical about calling it proprietary..! - Prateek To unsubscribe

Re: [ilugd]: A matter of Ethics

2003-03-27 Thread Raj Mathur
[Switching to LD and LIG] > "Sunil" == Sunil Dhaka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Sunil> Hi List, Narrated below is a situation: Sunil> Linux box implementing Sunil> IPTables (as included in the distro aka out of the box) + A Sunil> Winz box runni