mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Richar
for the E-mail
Authentication Summit (linked to this news release on
the FTC Web site: www.ftc.gov.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>&g
he IETF meetings itself since there is considerable
community interviewing to be done.
Volunteer for NOMCOM ..its the right thing to do .
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>&
ellent tourist information is at.
http://www.washington.org
Matt
___
Ietf mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
IETF.
Note he is explicitly NOT offering the draft in accordance with 2026
http://www.dundi.com/dundi.txt
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
_
Ietf mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
or may not be a
bad idea either but it should highlight that if you price a product (
numbering ) too high people will look for ways to "route" around it.
NAT's have been the inevitable answer to the poor pricing policy of IP
numbering.
>>>>>>>>>>>>&
At 01:44 PM 11/22/2004, Fred Baker wrote:
At 01:05 PM 11/22/04 -0500, Richard Shockey wrote:
Yes Fred I would _expect_ my ISP to sell me a /64 but at what price? It
continues to amaze me that no one discussing the IP V6 adoption issues
will focus attention on the obvious question ..what is it
At
Richard Shockey wrote:
> I think the problem the Internet Engineering community has had is that
> we have not taken out to lunch some of our friends in Economic Theory
> who would help us understand the IPV6 adoption problem for what it is
> an economic not a technical issue.
Ye
net-drafts/draft-ietf-vpim-routing-08.txt
__
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Richard Shockey, Senior Manager, Strategic Technology Ini
,
i.e., service provider bankruptcy, layoffs, etc.
I'm sure we can expand on the model endlessly...
--Pekka Nikander
___
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
--
Richard Shockey, Director - Member
Session Border Controller for dessert ?
Grumble Grumble ..< burp>
See you in Vancouver,
Spencer
From: "Richard Shockey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Pekka Nikander" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc:
Sent: Friday, September 09, 2005 1:35 PM
Subject: Re: "The IETF ha
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
--
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Richard Shockey, Direct
04.txt
Pages : 18
Date : 2006-1-18
This document provides the IAD with technical and logistic criteria
for selecting venues for IETF meetings.
A URL for this Internet-Draft is:
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-palet-ietf-meeting-venue-selection
-criteria-04.txt
--
Richard S
ed for community input the current IETF
administrative structure is very new and some what fragile and we should
not for the time being impose unwanted solutions on them they did not
solicit support for.
--
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
.
--
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Richard Shockey, Director - Member of Technical Staff
NeuStar Inc.
46000 Center Oak Plaza - Sterling, VA 20166
sip:rshockey(at)iptel.org
Can this be extended to WG naming rights as well. :-)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, April 01, 2008 12:58 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RFC 5241 on Naming Right
draft-ietf-brineyspears-SIP-NAT-transversal-issues-000134(and counting).txt
Cool..
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
> Of Henning Schulzrinne
> Sent: Tuesday, April 01, 2008 3:05 PM
> To: Richard Shockey
> Cc
Exactly .. I don't see the problem. I've not seen any evidence of abuse.
IMHO if the procedure is not broken why are we trying to fix it?
Why is the IETF so continuingly dragged about in these, frankly trivial,
process issues?
> I won't repeat what others have said about the presence or
> abs
+1 no brainer
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
> Of Pete Resnick
> Sent: Wednesday, May 21, 2008 3:06 PM
> To: Ray Pelletier
> Cc: Working Group Chairs; IAB; IETF Discussion; IAOC; The IESG; RFC
> Editor
> Subject: Re: [IAOC] ISSN
Now can we get back to our regularly scheduled rants on the pro's an
con's of ASCII in RFC's?
--
___
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
identityblog.com/stories/2004/12/09/thelaws.html
___
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
--
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
t are very familiar with Identity
related problems and protocols. I am a bit disturbed that a solution is
being proposed before the problem and the alternatives are throughly
investigated.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>&
-Scott-
___
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
--
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> On Monday, July 17, 2006 10:11:07 AM -0400 Jeffrey Altman
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > For me Paris and Montreal were the
> > two worst meetings I have experienced in ten years because of the
> > separation of the IETF hotel from the meeting locations and the in
> > ability to provide ne
> -Original Message-
> From: Melinda Shore [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, July 17, 2006 11:31 AM
> To: Dave Cridland
> Cc: IETF-Discussion
> Subject: Re: Meetings in other regions
>
> On 7/17/06 11:26 AM, "Dave Cridland" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I think Melinda's intenti
> -Original Message-
> From: Richard Shockey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, August 30, 2006 6:55 PM
> To: 'IETF-Discussion'
> Subject: What is going on with the NOMCOM
>
>
>
> Maybe my mail filters are failing but I understand th
1, 2006 Wall Street Journal which reports the the sales figures
from the previous trading day - August 31, 2006. The list we will use is
the same as before, but with the IAB member's name removed. The list will
be sent in a separate mail.
Thank you.
Andrew
Richard Shockey
Director, Mem
Maybe my mail filters are failing but I understand there is a problem with
the selection process.
Can some one explain this ASAP.
Richard Shockey
Director, Member of the Technical Staff
NeuStar
46000 Center Oak Plaza - Sterling, VA 20166
sip:rshockey(at)iptel.org
sip:5651(at)neustarlab.biz
> -Original Message-
> From: Brian E Carpenter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, August 31, 2006 3:29 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Cc: 'IETF-Discussion'
> Subject: Re: Now there seems to be lack of communicaiton here...
>
> Richard Shockey w
Granted 3777 does not require the consultation of the community on disputes
involving the NOMCOM but given the highly unusual nature of the problem at
hand and the tendency of the IETF toward anal retentive behavior in matters
of process it seems reasonable to suggest that a wider set of views sh
I agree as well. Again, having started this charming little discussion
thread, any other course of action at this late stage would cause more
problems than it would solve.
R. Shockey
> -Original Message-
> From: Joel M. Halpern [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, August 31, 2
As someone who was actually selected in the previous round and started this
little thread, I support this position.
> I've reviewed the specification for this process, including the random
> selection algorithm, several times over the past few years. I've always
> believed the selection proce
And to that hopefully final note, lets not forget that taking on the
responsibility of NOMCOM chair is a generally thankless task that Andrew has
volunteered to do.
The process has to go forward and Harald is completely correct.
I was selected in the previous spin and if selected again Andrew w
Well said.. Incompetence and stupidity have never been an impediment to a
genuine democratic process. You only need look at the US Congress, UK
Parliament, German Bundestag, and Japanese Diet etal for evidence of that.
> -Original Message-
> From: Theodore Tso [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
I love it … just bomb the fux spammers
into submission.
“Off we go into the wild cyber
yonder ….Climbing high into IP ..”
Or maybe …
“Over hill over dale we hit the
cyber trail…For its HI HI HEE in the Cyber Artillery ... and those
Caissons go rolling along.”
A excellent start...
You forgot $500 for messages on the use of ASCII in RFC's.
-Original Message-
From: Eric Rosen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, August 01, 2007 10:50 AM
To: Eric Gray (LO/EUS)
Cc: ietf@ietf.org
Subject: Re: Charging I-Ds
Eric Gray> The discussion is esse
In keeping with Eric Rosen's excellent thread ..
The simple solution is to charge 500 .. UK POUNDS!! for Internet Access
during the IETF meetings. This is clearly in keeping with standard
hotel/airport practices around the world.
This would clearly solve the budget problem as well as discourage
> -Original Message-
> From: David Kessens [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2007 3:40 PM
> To: Pete Resnick; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; ietf@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: IPv4 Outage Planned for IETF 71 Plenary
> Quite frankly, I could care less about th
ead of a pin this is it.
It is a ongoing privilege to make things like this happen.
This article BTW is the Number One emailed article currently on the NY Times
web site.
Richard Shockey
Director, Member of the Technical Staff
NeuStar
46000 Center Oak Plaza - Sterling, VA 20166
PSTN Office +1 5
>
> It's Ray's job to make the call. It's the IAOC's job to see that he
> does his job well. I think Ray has at least earned the benefit of the
> doubt.
I don't think so ..given the perfectly rational questions that are being
asked about this particular sub-optimal site, the community has
ilto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, February 06, 2008 5:21 PM
> To: Richard Shockey
> Cc: 'IAB'; 'IETF Discussion'; 'IAOC'
> Subject: Re: IETF 72 --> Dublin!
>
>
> Richard,
>
> On Wed, Feb 06, 2008 at 04:48:15PM -0500, Richard S
Thanks Bob ..as someone who had "questions", I find this a perfectly
reasonable and rational explanation.
>
> In the case of Dublin, the IAOC did understand that the sites
> distance to Dublin wasn't ideal, but it was the only site we could
> find in the area that meet the other requiremen
>
> > Is there an unwritten requirement that IETFs are placed to afford
> > us sightseeing?
>
You mean this isn't the Individual Enlightenment and Travel Foundation
mailing list ... oh so sorry.
___
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@ietf.org
http://www.ietf.
And this coming from the Standards body that has developed SIP ...
unbelievable. I don't think I'm going to listen to any more arguments about
IPv6 experiments during Plenary's any more.
>
> One thing the IAOC is looking at at this instant is our phone bill.
> The IETF's phone budget for 2008
al round.
DocFinder: 3736
http://www.nwfusion.com/power/2002/bracket.html
-
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>&
be most grateful for knowledgeable, professional, technical opinions from
folks like us.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>&g
ndustry, plus a few policy wonks.
Some additional remarks from McAdams are on-line at
http://www.news.cornell.edu/releases/Feb03/McAdams.AFN.ws.html
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
I'm sure the SIP working group could help the Secretariat identify products
and services that could make this essential function more productive and
operate at less cost.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>&
ite a letter, sign it with a return address and put
a postage stamp on it or make a phone call to a local representatives office..
The US Congress is not very good a dealing with email ..trust me.
they like snail mail...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Significant news of note..
Vendors must be compliant by Oct 1
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A8-2003Jun13.html?nav=hptoc_tn
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>&
st be taken into account for all
purchases starting Oct. 1"
which, if you have played in that game, means little beyond powerpoint
and promises.
perhaps but you read the transcript
http://www.dod.gov/transcripts/2003/tr20030613-0274.html
randy
>>>>>>>>>>
o the blackhole business, but for
VoIP this time, since it'll be a HGE market.
The Feds will beat you to market on this one...
--
Paul Vixie
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
unt etc it can be traced
and prosecuted.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Richard Shockey, Senior Manager, Strateg
Vienna Rathaus? after all it is a spactular venue.. I was
thinking of pulling out the suit and bowtie or that one if for no reason
other than to honor our gracious hosts..
l
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
eal problem statement and a focused WG could
tackle the problem head on and deliver results. This was the direction we
took with SIPPING for the specific IM problem and its what we need to do
with SIP Conferencing.
Most sincerely,
sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>>>>>>>>
that it limits itself to sip-specific
conference, and no one outside of the sip community will much care...
That very reasonable.
My very best wishes ..
/mtr
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>&
obviously you've never used SIP on a connection with greater
thatn 128K of upstream bandwith or properly configured ethernet network
with priority bitting.
my sincerest sympathies..
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
ography
system and a certification authority.
giuseppe canale
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Richard Shockey, Senior Manager,
ring improvements in spam
control and reduction technology.
http://csrc.nist.gov/Federal-register/Spam-Workshop-FRnotice.pdf
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Richard Shockey, Senior Manager, Strategic Technology Initiatives
NeuStar Inc.
46000 C
r of
addresses for Internet-connected devices, and may
enable new market applications, facilitate improved
security and reduce operational expenses for Internet
users.
The text of the notice is available at NTIA's Web site
at www.ntia.doc.gov.
>>>>>>>>>>>>&
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Richard Shockey, Senior Manager, Strategic Technology Initiatives
NeuStar Inc.
46000 Center Oak Pla
what is the standard voltage - sockets in Korea? Its my first time there
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Richard
ng driven by in part the lack of IP4
numbers but certainly the lack of knowledge, marketing skills or just plain
greed of the ISP community.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>&g
st 15 free fax to email services and
more on the way. (see my sig file below)
ISP's and corporate email administrators should just get used to large and
frequent email attachments, upgrade their systems, or watch their customers
or job go somewhere else.
>>>>>>>>>>
At 05:44 PM 12/13/1999 -0700, Vernon Schryver wrote:
> > From: Richard Shockey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> > ...
> > The simple fact is that E-Mail attachments are only going to get bigger
> and
> > more frequent, for no other reason than RFC2305 and RFC2532 The
ormed me that they view the
charter in a positive light with some revisions and a initial focus on a
Goals and Requirements charter vs protocol development.
Proposed Charter:
QUALDOCS - HIGH QUALITY DOCUMENT DISTRIBUTION
Chair(s): Richard Shockey
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
.. HTTP Push to a defined directory with email notification
of an appropriate URL. One problem.
http://www.patents.ibm.com/patlist?icnt=US&patent_number=5790790
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>&g
nd even
ignore it when it is brought to their attention.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Richard Shockey
Shockey Consulting LLC
8045 Big Bend Blvd. Suite 110
St. Louis, MO 63
out the dangers of
patenting these kinds of "obvious" concepts based on IETF work? How do we
define the difference between " unique and innovative" from the merely
"clever use of"? How do we educate the legislative authorities? I wish I
had an answer.
>>>
;IP Encapsulation on Hanes XL networks"
I see possibilities here... :-)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Richard Shockey
Shockey Consulting LLC
8045 Big Bend Blvd. Suite
The Wireless Hot topic discussed IAB BOF in OZ.
tks.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Richard Shockey
Shockey Consulting LLC
8045 Big Bend Blvd. Suite 110
St. Louis, MO 6
d able to purchase service
for an ISP willing to give be a nice block of IP V6 numbers ( 50 will do )
at a reasonable price and the support necessary to implement them.
Dr. Cerf ..you have a customer.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
n the automobile industry vs the aircraft industry vs a
consumer products company vs a typicial teleco.
Whatever it is now it would be reasonable to assume that address
consumption per employee within 10 years will be 4x what it is now.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>&g
se they will be taken away.
It is a system that has worked remarkably well and is rapidly being adopted
my many other countries as well.
>A URL for this Internet-Draft is:
>http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-foster-e164-gstn-np-00.txt
>>>>>>>>>>
/www.politechbot.com/info/subscribe.html
>This message is archived at http://www.politechbot.com/
>----------
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Please Note New Contact Information:
Richard Shockey
Shockey Consulting LLC
5237 Sutherland
St. Louis, MO 63109
Voice 314.503.0640
eFAX Fax to EMail 815.333.1237 (Preferred for Fax)
INTERNET Mail & IFAX : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<
sk they have to preform 3 times a year.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Richard Shockey
Senior Technical Industry Liaison
NeuStar Inc.
1120 Vermont A
At 05:00 PM 12/4/2000 -0500, Dan Kolis wrote:
>In the present regime, its not surprising the frist below does not resolve
>and the second does:
>
>http://www.déjà.fr/
>http://www.deja.fr/
>
>
>In the proposed regime, its not obvious what to do from a purely consumer
>point of view.
Depends on who
ain. It is
> >another thing to deal with multiple layers of perhaps not so well
> >implemented NATs which may not even support tunneling of IPv6.
> >And that is where we appear to be headed over the next few years.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
act the largest
>number of residential customers. But they get annoyed when the
>service is shared over multiple residences. They'd get just as
>annoyed if the mechanism were IPv6 instead of NAT.
>
>Keith
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>&
I'd like to understand what may be happening in Europe with the
KPN/Quest/ebone collapse.
Its my understanding that it carried between 1/4 and 1/3 of the European
backbone traffic but as it stands now I've seen no reports of large scale
traffic disruptions.
From a traffic engineering perspe
rver working (and
>am hitting problems). i am just concerned about process and
>precedent.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>&
much closer to agreement than you might imagine and I
wholeheartedly agree with the comments posted by my colleague Jon Peterson
on the matter...and after all he is the co-chair of SIMPLE.
>/mtr
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
The following paper is to be delivered at the upcoming TPRC Conference in
Alexandria VA interesting reading for IETF folks.
PAPER:
http://intel.si.umich.edu/tprc/papers/2002/97/Strangers_CDT_to_TPRC.pdf
http://www.tprc.org/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>&
AIL PROTECTED]>
Richard Shockey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Transport Area Advisor:
Scott Bradner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mailing Lists:
General Discussion:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Subscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
In Body: subscribe
Archive: ftp://ftp.ietf.org/ietf-mail-archive/enum/
AGENDA BASHI
nt seen any comments on my draft ..so
Thoughts etc?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Richard Shockey, Senior Manager
my previous message was meant for the WG. Monday morning suboptimal
keyboard operations .
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>&
My my it must be springtime! Time for our annual food fight ritual of ASCII
in RFC's.
Actually I was thinking that the IETF should approach the International
Digital Publishing Forum with the thought that they consider making the
.epub format an IETF standard. .epub is getting considerable trac
And I want it now! Yes I'll pay thank you.
Richard Shockey
Shockey Consulting
Chairman of the Board of Directors SIP Forum
PSTN Mobile: +1 703.593.2683
< <mailto:richard(at)shockey.us> mailto:richard(at)shockey.us>
skype: rshockey101
LinkedIn : <http://www.linkedin.com/
About 10 to 15 USD would work fine for me BTW.
At least we should do it before the ITU and TIES does it .right? J
From: ietf-boun...@ietf.org [mailto:ietf-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of
Richard Shockey
Sent: Saturday, April 03, 2010 5:21 PM
To: ietf@ietf.org
Subject: Ok .. I want my
Lets not forget what this specification was attempting to solve, which has
been the well known boot strap problem with SIP-CUA's we have collectively
ignored since the creation of SIP, especially those that might use (dare I
say it) phone numbers. The model here is to make such things as SIP CUA's
That was what I had in mind when I started this thread or maybe
configuration options for push of new WG drafts.
No browser including Safari displays ASCII text well and that has been my
ultimate objection. It drives me nuts that I have to print out all new
drafts to actually read them ( sorry HP
Well if you are over 55 with bifocals, like me, you might have a issue. Which
is why tablet readers really are a boon.
On 04/08/2010 07:47 AM, Richard Shockey wrote:
> That was what I had in mind when I started this thread or maybe
> configuration options for push of new WG drafts.
&
> -Original Message-----
> From: Richard Shockey [mailto:rich...@shockey.us]
> Sent: Thursday, April 08, 2010 10:34 AM
>
> Lets not forget what this specification was attempting to solve, which has
> been the well known boot strap problem with SIP-CUA's we have collective
> pagination. (It's a workaround for what you're complaining about,
> but it works.)
>
> Tony Hansen
>t...@att.com
>
> On 4/8/2010 10:47 AM, Richard Shockey wrote:
>> That was what I had in mind when I started this thread or maybe
>> configurati
Aka FaceTime?
Some of us in the RAI directorate would like to extend a welcoming hand. J
Plus see what the SDP looks like etc , interop options, naming, where is the
rendezvous server, etal.
Small stuff.
Richard Shockey
Shockey Consulting
Chairman of the Board of Directors SIP
A we already have centralized solutions for interdomain routing based on
E.164. its called ENUM in both its private and public instantiations. It
works pretty well BTW and globally deployed.
IMHO this charter is a non starter and should not be approved on the basis
of this statement alone.
"findi
at.
IMHO in the absence of any rational trust or security model you can
certainly publish something as Informational but getting something past the
IESG is another thing entirely.
From: Peter Musgrave [mailto:peter.musgr...@magorcorp.com]
Sent: Saturday, July 03, 2010 5:49 PM
To: Ric
ave a honest statement of what you propose to develop. This
is about "truth in protocol development" tm.
From: Peter Musgrave [mailto:peter.musgr...@magorcorp.com]
Sent: Monday, July 05, 2010 9:15 AM
To: Richard Shockey
Cc: Romascanu, Dan (Dan); Mary Barnes; DISPATCH; IETF-Discussi
1 - 100 of 155 matches
Mail list logo
