draft-ietf-brineyspears-SIP-NAT-transversal-issues-000134(and counting).txt
Cool.. > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf > Of Henning Schulzrinne > Sent: Tuesday, April 01, 2008 3:05 PM > To: Richard Shockey > Cc: 'IETF Discussion' > Subject: Re: RFC 5241 on Naming Rights in IETF Protocols > > Just publish an RFC that contains the names of popular celebrities, > and use Google ads. The IETF site should do well in link-rankings... > > A number of non-IETF sites already make money off RFCs courtesy of > Google ads. > > On Apr 1, 2008, at 2:53 PM, Richard Shockey wrote: > > > Can this be extended to WG naming rights as well. :-) > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:ietf-announce- > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > ] > > On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Tuesday, April 01, 2008 12:58 PM > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: RFC 5241 on Naming Rights in IETF Protocols > > > > > > A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries. > > > > > > RFC 5241 > > > > Title: Naming Rights in IETF Protocols > > Author: A. Falk, S. Bradner > > Status: Informational > > Date: 1 April 2008 > > Mailbox: [EMAIL PROTECTED], > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Pages: 12 > > Characters: 25304 > > Updates/Obsoletes/SeeAlso: None > > > > URL: http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc5241.txt > > > > This document proposes a new revenue source for the IETF to support > > standardization activities: protocol field naming rights, i.e., the > > association of commercial brands with protocol fields. This memo > > describes a process for assignment of rights and explores some of > the > > issues associated with the process. Individuals or organizations > that > > wish to purchase naming rights for one or more protocol fields are > > expected to follow this process. This memo provides information for > > the > > Internet community. > > > > > > INFORMATIONAL: This memo provides information for the Internet > > community. > > It does not specify an Internet standard of any kind. Distribution > of > > this memo is unlimited. > > > > This announcement is sent to the IETF list and the RFC-DIST list. > > Requests to be added to or deleted from the IETF distribution list > > should be sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Requests to be > > added to or deleted from the RFC-DIST distribution list should > > be sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > Details on obtaining RFCs via FTP or EMAIL may be obtained by > sending > > an EMAIL message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message body > > > > help: ways_to_get_rfcs. For example: > > > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: getting rfcs > > > > help: ways_to_get_rfcs > > > > Requests for special distribution should be addressed to either the > > author of the RFC in question, or to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Unless > > specifically noted otherwise on the RFC itself, all RFCs are for > > unlimited distribution. > > > > Submissions for Requests for Comments should be sent to > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please consult RFC 2223, Instructions to > > RFC > > Authors, for further information. > > > > > > The RFC Editor Team > > USC/Information Sciences Institute > > > > ... > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > IETF-Announce mailing list > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce > > > > _______________________________________________ > > IETF mailing list > > IETF@ietf.org > > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf > > _______________________________________________ > IETF mailing list > IETF@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf _______________________________________________ IETF mailing list IETF@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
