On 7/13/2013 2:20 PM, Yoav Nir wrote:
So finding your site is not that difficult for first-timers. But regardless,
the people who type in addresses or DNS names in full are rare and far between.
Agreed. Just to see again, I tried it on my wife's new computer with
Chrome and it showed:
On Jul 14, 2013, at 4:34 PM, Hector Santos wrote:
>
>
> On 7/13/2013 2:20 PM, Yoav Nir wrote:
>>
>>
>> So finding your site is not that difficult for first-timers. But regardless,
>> the people who type in addresses or DNS names in full are rare and far
>> between.
>>
>
> Agreed. Just to
On 7/14/2013 9:53 AM, Yoav Nir wrote:
On Jul 14, 2013, at 4:34 PM, Hector Santos wrote:
On 7/13/2013 2:20 PM, Yoav Nir wrote:
So finding your site is not that difficult for first-timers. But regardless,
the people who type in addresses or DNS names in full are rare and far between.
Reading some of this discussion leaves me puzzled because I can't tell
which things that some people are saying are intended to be about
"dotless" use of domains, or are intended to be about the expansion of
top level domains in general.
Yes, they should be trreated as entirely separate topic
Hi Arturo,
diffcult for us, english speaking people other than western,
Section 4 has been moved.
thanks for your comments,
-Hui
2013/7/11 Arturo Servin
>
> Great document, I really liked.
>
> Same as SM I would suggest change "western" for something else.
>
> And I would also su
will mention this and candidate ways in the next version.
thanks,
-Hui
2013/7/11 Simon Perreault
> Le 2013-07-11 02:04, Hui Deng a écrit :
> > We submitted two drafts to help people here to correctly call chinese
> > people names:
> >
> > http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-deng-call-chinese-name
revised to "for english speaking people who care"
thanks
-Hui
2013/7/11 Ted Lemon
> On Jul 11, 2013, at 8:14 AM, Hui Deng wrote:
> > I personally feel that this is maybe one of not easier part for western
> people to do in today IETF. and chinese's names sound maybe more diffcult
> than othe
Right, it seems most email addresses are the correct order as far as my
email
deng...@chinamobile.com
denghu...@gmail.com
denghu...@hotmail.com
-Hui
2013/7/11 Ted Lemon
> On Jul 11, 2013, at 9:58 AM, Simon Perreault
> wrote:
> > Is there a
> > way to guess what order a name is written in? So
Hi Stephen,
all caps should be included, thanks for your pointint out.
for your 85% is one syllable, I guess that normally has two characters for
family name, then they will have two syllables?
thanks,
-Hui
2013/7/11 Stephen Sprunk
> On 11-Jul-13 08:58, Simon Perreault wrote:
> > I have a
I guess XML draft doesn't support "Lǎobǎn"
thanks for your remindness.
-Hui
2013/7/11 Stephen Sprunk
> On 10-Jul-13 19:04, Hui Deng wrote:
>
> We submitted two drafts to help people here to correctly call chinese
> people names:
>
> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-deng-call-chinese-names-00
>
Hi Ted,
I did explain them in the 1st paragraph about minorities (not mentioned
that they could have two kids in mainland)
anyway, I will revise the title by adding "Chinese "Han" people", hope that
will be ok
-Hui
2013/7/11 Ted Hardie
> Howdy,
>
> Thanks for your efforts. I would suggest, h
I guess that George is your given name. Wes is your family name. Hope I am
not wrong.:)
-Hui
2013/7/11 George, Wes
> > From: ietf-boun...@ietf.org [mailto:ietf-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of
> > Melinda Shore
>
> > I agree
> > that this is probably not appropriate for publication as an RFC
> >
On 07/12/2013 02:40 PM, John R Levine wrote:
Point your browser at http://dk/ or http://tm/ and see what happens.
As John points out, the ccTLDs are already doing this. ICANN has no
authority to tell the ccTLDs NOT to do it, thus restricting the gTLDs
from doing it (via their contract with I
On 7/14/2013 8:14 PM, Doug Barton wrote:
It is unarguably true that as things currently stand there will be
"problems" with dotless domains. How widespread, and how serious those
problems become is yet to be seen. However it is also unarguably true
that if there is sufficient market demand for do
On 07/14/2013 08:25 PM, Dave Crocker wrote:
On 7/14/2013 8:14 PM, Doug Barton wrote:
It is unarguably true that as things currently stand there will be
"problems" with dotless domains. How widespread, and how serious those
problems become is yet to be seen. However it is also unarguably true
tha
In article <51e368f9.70...@dougbarton.us> you write:
>On 07/12/2013 02:40 PM, John R Levine wrote:
>>
>> Point your browser at http://dk/ or http://tm/ and see what happens.
>
>As John points out, the ccTLDs are already doing this. ICANN has no
>authority to tell the ccTLDs NOT to do it, thus rest
At 06:53 14-07-2013, Yoav Nir wrote:
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-moonesamy-dotless-domains-00
That memo discusses about the case of the dotless domains in terms of
the technical standards. Comments are welcome.
At 13:11 13-07-2013, Ofer Inbar wrote:
What this brings to mind is that we
17 matches
Mail list logo
