One thing I’ve noticed is that Icinga1 used to provide formatted date/time
messages (duration: "2 hours 4 minutes”) whereas if I am reading the docs right
for Icinga2 we are only supplied with epoch timestamps or duration in seconds?
Did I overlook options to get formatted times?
Are there func
Hi,
this service-apply-for is a super nice feature, but there is one thing I
haven't managed to achieve for this specific case, which is to ignore one
partition for one type of host. Suppose that I have zillions of linux nodes
that are configured in a very similar way. In my linux template, I coul
Hi,
I'm testing PagerDuty and I like it in general, just one problem, or merely
inconvenience - if there is an problem raised from icinga, you have to
actually acknowledge it twice - in icinga itself and then in pagerduty.
Maybe the acknowledge work from icinga to pagerduty, I saw somewhere that
i
On Fri, 04 Sep 2015, Martin Stiborský wrote:
> Hi,
> I'm testing PagerDuty and I like it in general, just one problem, or merely
> inconvenience - if there is an problem raised from icinga, you have to
> actually acknowledge it twice - in icinga itself and then in pagerduty.
>
> Maybe the acknowl
Am 04.09.2015 um 10:30 schrieb Martin Stiborský:
Hi,
I'm testing PagerDuty and I like it in general, just one problem, or merely
inconvenience - if there is an problem raised from icinga, you have to actually
acknowledge it twice - in icinga itself and then in pagerduty.
Maybe the acknowledge w
Hum, seems like having another look at the doc helped:
http://docs.icinga.org/icinga2/latest/doc/module/icinga2/toc#!/icinga2/latest/doc/module/icinga2/chapter/library-reference#dictionary-remove
Spoke too soon, sorry :-)
2015-09-04 10:30 GMT+02:00 Christophe HAEN :
> Hi,
>
> this service-apply-
Am 04.09.2015 um 10:30 schrieb Christophe HAEN:
Hi,
this service-apply-for is a super nice feature, but there is one thing I
haven't managed to achieve for this specific case, which is to ignore one
partition for one type of host. Suppose that I have zillions of linux nodes
that are configured
What pattern are you speaking about ? You mean for an apply rule ? The
problem with the apply rule is that the whole Apply-for loop would be
ignored no ?
2015-09-04 10:40 GMT+02:00 Michael Friedrich :
> Am 04.09.2015 um 10:30 schrieb Christophe HAEN:
>
> Hi,
>
> this service-apply-for is a super
Am 04.09.2015 um 11:08 schrieb Christophe HAEN:
What pattern are you speaking about ? You mean for an apply rule ? The problem
with the apply rule is that the whole Apply-for loop would be ignored no ?
No. Without any relation to apply rules and whatnot, which pattern or equality
is it for your
In fact, our configuration is generated from "pieces". Each host has a
certain amount of properties that describes what it is and how it is used.
What we do is to concatenate one piece of ruby code for each property
(smells like puppet ah ;-) ). For example, I would have these various
pieces:
tpl_
Hi
We do have logstash but we are not yet utilizing to its potential and not for
collecting the Icinga logs. Have heard rumors of Splunk but am not privy.
But to answer not historical. Had a scenario where a status message was
repeated for multiple checks and I wanted to get an idea of how m
Hi,
Am 04.09.2015 um 12:54 schrieb Felix Cruz:
Hi
We do have logstash but we are not yet utilizing to its potential and not for
collecting the Icinga logs. Have heard rumors of Splunk but am not privy.
From what I've seen recently Logstash and Graylog are on a good way to
replace Splunk in
I'm looking for a way to setup Icinga checks to run from one Icinga server
via a second ISP.
Currently, I'm doing this with a second Icinga server that has specific
routes setup in the routing table and then returns the results to the main
server with NSCA.
What I'm looking to do is to have this
Hello,
I have Icinga 2 (v2.3.9) installed with Icinga Web 2 (2.0.0-4) on CentOS 7 with
all latest updates of stable releases (OS+Icinga). I would like to have AD
authentication, but it doesn't work. DB authentication works fine and all the
rest of the configuration seems to be okay too.
My AD
mailman/listinfo/icinga-users
--?
Michael Friedrich, DI (FH)
Senior Developer
NETWAYS GmbH | Deutschherrnstr. 15-19 | D-90429 Nuernberg
Tel: +49 911 92885-0 | Fax: +49 911 92885-77
GF: Julian Hein, Bernd Erk | AG Nuernberg HRB18461
http://www.netways.de | michael.friedr...@netways.de
** OSBConf 2015
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Greetings all,
I've been running a "simple" Icinga2 setup for a few months now. It
took a bit to get things running, but I believe I understand how it's
working right now. Currently I have a single Master node that runs
icinga2 and icingaweb
16 matches
Mail list logo
