On Fri, 04 Sep 2015, Martin Stiborský wrote: > Hi, > I'm testing PagerDuty and I like it in general, just one problem, or merely > inconvenience - if there is an problem raised from icinga, you have to > actually acknowledge it twice - in icinga itself and then in pagerduty. > > Maybe the acknowledge work from icinga to pagerduty, I saw somewhere that > it can process the acknowledge message, I have to test it. > But it can't work the other way around, when a problem is acknowledged in > PagerDuty. > > This is a chance for the REST api planned for icinga 2.4.0? Then such a > synchronization would be possible, right? It should be already possible to solve this with either the command socket or the livestatus api.
But the REST API will probably be nicer. Alex _______________________________________________ icinga-users mailing list icinga-users@lists.icinga.org https://lists.icinga.org/mailman/listinfo/icinga-users
