I don't but I probably should. Doing the 62x160 screen on a 22 inch monitor
with my old eyes, I sometimes lose track of what line I'm on when deleting a
dataset in ISPF 3.4. :-( Haven't lost a dataset yet...
Rex
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List on behalf
Hi all,
I'm looking at DFDSS dataset dump and see this parameter in the manual:
NEWNAMEUnconditional which would allow me to rename datasets being backed up
instead of needing to use the RENUNC on a restore. Unfortunately, the manual
also states - and I verified by trying it - that I can't us
Grant,
Would it work to use an IF-THEN-ELSE in the ADRDSSU step:
IF MAXCC LE 4 THEN SET MAXCC=0
Then you should be able to just check for RC=0 in your IF statement at the end
of the job
Rex
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Ward Able, Grant
Sent: T
Trailing edge...
We finally got migrated off a machine with 32K (yes, K) in the 1984-5
timeframe.
Rex
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
PINION, RICHARD W.
Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2019 9:39 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: [External] Re:
Hello list,
I have a few HSM ML2 duplex tapes that no longer have their corresponding
migrate tapes that I can't seem to get rid of. If I try to do DELVOL, I get
an error saying they're not defined migrate volumes. What we're doing is
migrating our HSM ML2 environment into a VTS (replicated)
wning" primary volume.
Recycle the "owning" primary volume. The "offending" duplex volumes will be
deleted as part of the recycle process.
HSEND RECYCLE EXECUTE VOLUME(owning volser)
HTH,
-----Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
ainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Pommier, Rex
Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2019 11:30 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: HSM question - ML2 copy2 tapes that have no copy1
Allan,
Sorry, this doesn't help. The LIST TTOC is only showing my VTS-based ML2 tapes
which have no
Thank you, Max, for that excellent response. I'm off to the tape mgmt. doc to
figure out how to scratch the tapes.
Rex
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Max
Smith
Sent: Friday, February 15, 2019 9:28 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: [External]
Tony,
When you are defining your new control unit, at the "add control unit" panel,
put in the CU number and additional stuff you need. CUADD isn't yet.
You will then get your "select processor / CU" panel, select the appropriate
CCSID and other info - CUADD isn't yet.
The next screen is anot
Similar situation. True story from the early 80s and I'm being purposely vague
as to who/where to protect the victims. Non-IBM datacenter (one of the bunch
for those who remember) removable disk drives in a computer room that had
normal ceiling tile - you know the ones that are always flaking
Regarding the "how do the IBM hardware guys set the LIB ID" question - it is
set during the initial configuration of the machine. We were able to pick the
library ID for the composite library as well as the distributed library name
back when we put our first TS7720 on the floor. When we upgrad
It was sheer size of the componentry that drove this design. I think the 3990
was the last stand-alone disk controller. With the arrival of 2105s, the CU
was inside the same cabinet as the drives and Logical CUs (LCUs) were born.
One big black box (literally). Adding additional cabinets no
19:53:07 +, Pommier, Rex wrote:
>where did the 9340 subsystem fit in the timeline between 3990 and 2105? or the
>RAMAC2?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_IBM_magnetic_disk_drives#IBM_9340_and_9345
--
Tom Ma
PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: [External] Re: Ancient DASD connectivity
On Wed, 15 May 2019 20:31:55 +0000, Pommier, Rex wrote:
>The point I was making was that IBM had some DASD subsystems for
>large(r) customers with integrated controllers
Oh. Sorry I misunderstood. Thanks for the clar
John,
I see that you're doing a TYPRUN=NORUN. What happens if you strip all the
excess/optional lines from your SYSIN. Can you eliminate the error by
eliminating most of the control cards and just re-add them until you hit the
error again?
Rex
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe
Do you have some kind of hidden hex character in your input stream?
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
John Dawes
Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2019 10:21 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: [External] Re: DFDSS QUESTION - PHYSICAL DATASET BACKUP
I tried
John,
Do you need to change your INDDNAME to PHYSINDD? The 2.2 manual indicates that
INDDNAME is used for full or track copying and PHYSINDD is used for datasets.
Are both the datasets you're going after on the same volume?
Rex
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
I just reread the manual. INDDNAME is OK. My other question still arises.
Are both datasets on the same volume?
Rex
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Pommier, Rex
Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2019 11:48 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re
a
successful Physical backup of 2 dsns.I am curious if it works for you. I am
running V2R02.0
On Thursday, 16 May 2019, 4:47:56 pm UTC, Pommier, Rex
wrote:
John,
Do you need to change your INDDNAME to PHYSINDD? The 2.2 manual indicates that
INDDNAME is used for full or track copying
I just changed my SYSIN to look as close to identical to yours as I can see,
given the formatting problems you're having, and it still worked. Regarding
the "column 1" question David had, I just tried it, and all DFDSS did was
ignore the first character of the dataset name and tell me it couldn
ay, May 17, 2019 7:29 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: [External] Re: DFDSS QUESTION - PHYSICAL DATASET BACKUP
Rex,
I used your jcl and it worked. I was successful with and without the NORUN
parm. A massive thanks.
On Thursday, 16 May 2019, 7:35:43 pm UTC, Pommier, Rex
wrote:
OPT(0) burns that much more CPU? Is this on all compiles or many or just a few
of them? If compiles are that bad using OPT(0), what will an OPT(2) do? We're
just starting our install of 6.3, going from 4.2 and this sounds like something
we need to be aware of.
Thanks,
Rex
-Original Mess
Charles,
A couple things to check. Is there anything in the SYSLOG showing what
happened to the task?
Check your JES2PARM member of parmlib. In there, you should find a
JOBCLASS(STC) stanza. What does that show for LOG, MSGCLASS, MSGLEVEL,
OUTDISP and OUTPUT?
Rex
-Original Message-
ERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Pommier, Rex
Sent: Thursday, May 21, 2020 9:23 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: [External] Where do started PROC errors go?
Charles,
A couple things to check. Is there anything in the SYSLOG showing what
happened to the task?
Check your JES2PARM member o
Carmen also brought up a good point, you may be running with a started task
table ICHRIN03 instead of the STARTED class.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Pommier, Rex
Sent: Thursday, May 21, 2020 11:55 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re
Hi Clark,
Not "was", is, DYL280 aka Vision:Results still exists. We run it in our
datacenter.
Rex
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Clark Morris
Sent: Friday, May 22, 2020 3:05 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: [External] Re: z/OS 2.3 systems
Hi Joe,
The point here is that even though this has been documented for decades, nobody
is actually doing this. Nobody seems to know what this DD would be used for,
it isn't being allocated, and beyond what you show from the manual, there's
nothing to show what the DD card would look like for
Hi Bernd,
My COBOL is about as old as yours is, but I have a niggling in the back of my
mind that AND takes precedence over OR, and if so, your equation became
IF ( TVOLL (IND1) NOT = HIGH-VALUE AND SMOD (IND1) = 'B' ) OR
SMOD (IND1) = 'R' so the TVOL and B would become false, bu
As our e-mails crossed in the ether, you are absolutely correct in your
evaluation below.
Rex
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Bernd Oppolzer
Sent: Friday, June 5, 2020 12:59 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: [External] Re: COBOL Question
So does this mean that 2/3 of companies out there are running unsupported
hardware and software?
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Raphaël Jacquot
Sent: Tuesday, June 9, 2020 7:48 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: [External] Re: "Everyone wants t
Maybe based on their "logic", my z14 is 30 years old because we're running an
application on it that was written in the late 80s. Never mind that it has
been maintained for the past 30+ years, since we can find 30 year old code in
the application, the entire thing must be 30+ years old.
Rex
-
Years ago, IBM did sell hardware/software to universities at deeply discounted
prices to attract young people to them. Why they stopped is anybody's guess.
Rex
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Tom
Brennan
Sent: Tuesday, June 9, 2020 10:54 AM
To: IBM-
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Paul Gilmartin
Sent: Wednesday, June 10, 2020 2:50 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: [External] Re: "Everyone wants to retire mainframes"
On Wed, 10 Jun 2020 17:02:40 +, Frank Swarbrick wrote:
>Here's a quo
But what of those of us who don't have SDSF? Yes, we exist. :-)
Rex
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Jousma, David
Sent: Monday, June 15, 2020 1:27 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: [External] Re: CBTTAPE
I keep saying thisuse the ISFSLAS
I remember that as well. They would display about 3-4 pages of the manual and
have the rest grayed out with the "pay to unlock and read".
Rex
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Tom
Brennan
Sent: Monday, June 15, 2020 2:03 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Paul Gilmartin
Sent: Monday, June 15, 2020 3:12 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: [External] Re: CBTTAPE
On Mon, 15 Jun 2020 19:04:24 +, Pommier, Rex wrote:
>But what of those of us who don't h
Hello list,
I have a "does it work" question. We don't run SDSF, instead have a competing
product. As part of our testing of 2.4, one of my coworkers submitted a job
with TYPRUN=COPY on the job card and found it doesn't work. Under 2.2, we get
the entire input stream before the JES2 job stat
, 2020 at 1:32 PM Pommier, Rex
wrote:
> Hello list,
>
> I have a "does it work" question. We don't run SDSF, instead have a
> competing product. As part of our testing of 2.4, one of my coworkers
> submitted a job with TYPRUN=COPY on the job card and found it d
.UA.EDU
Subject: [External] Re: z/OS 2.4 and SDSF question
I get the same thing you do under z/OS 2.4. About 12 lines of output. I
have SDSF.
On Tue, Jun 16, 2020 at 1:32 PM Pommier, Rex
wrote:
> Hello list,
>
> I have a "does it work" question. We don't run SDSF, i
Behalf Of
Michael Babcock
Sent: Tuesday, June 16, 2020 3:21 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: [External] Re: z/OS 2.4 and SDSF question
The default MSGLEVEL was 1,1 and that’s what was coded on the jobcard.
On Tue, Jun 16, 2020 at 2:47 PM Pommier, Rex
wrote:
> Hi Michael and Al
Hello list,
Based on the subject line of my post, does anybody know anything about
something called CA-ACCUCHEK? I have a developer asking about it and I know
nothing about it. I checked CA's (OK, Broadcom's) web site and got no hits.
Duck Duck Go wasn't any help either, pointing me to some
ternal] Re: CA-ACCUCHEK
CA-ACCUCHEK was a file comparison utility similar to comparex.
Joe
On Wed, Jun 17, 2020 at 2:06 PM Pommier, Rex
wrote:
> Hello list,
>
> Based on the subject line of my post, does anybody know anything about
> something called CA-ACCUCHEK? I have a develop
11.24.16 J0056548 WEDNESDAY, 17 JUN 2020
11.24.16 J0056548 IRR010I USERID ALOEFIS ASSIGNED TO THIS JOB.
Regards,
Al Loeffler
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainfra
Hi Steve,
As the OP, I agree that this doesn't appear to be an SDSF issue. I was trying
to make sure it wasn't a display issue with my third party software, and
knowing that others who are running SDSF are having the same issue gives me
confidence that it is a problem in (most likely) JES2.
In John's defense, when I saw "volume map" and "dfdss" in the same sentence, I
thought like John did, that you wanted a tape volume map. That's what I get
for thinking this early in the morning. :-)
Rex
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
David Spiege
DITTO or FileManager will produce such a disk volume map.
Rex
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Vernooij, Kees (ITOP NM) - KLM
Sent: Thursday, June 18, 2020 8:42 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: [External] Re: dfdss equivalent to fdr map
FDR MA
Update on this. I opened a PMR on it and got a reply back from IBM that they
are opening an APAR on this.
Rex
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Pommier, Rex
Sent: Tuesday, June 16, 2020 1:32 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: [External] z/OS
ssage-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Pommier, Rex
Sent: Friday, June 19, 2020 9:02 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: z/OS 2.4 and SDSF question
[CAUTION: This Email is from outside the Organization. Unless you trust the
sender, Don’t click links or open attachmen
I agree with Dave completely. I do similar - on both APPLY CHECK and APPLY.
Why spend an inordinate amount of time telling SMP/E manually to do what SMP/E
is designed to do automatically. Let it skip the open APARs and other things
that will cause a "bad" return code. Like Dave said, just ve
Yes, because z/OS (well, the allocation routines anyway) knows nothing of the
back-end storage. As far as z/OS is concerned its data is still sitting on
SLED 3390 volumes so things like free extent sizes and so on still matter.
Rex
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion Li
IBM assigned an APAR number on Friday to this. It is APAR OA59800.
Thanks,
Rex
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Pommier, Rex
Sent: Friday, June 19, 2020 9:10 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: [External] Re: z/OS 2.4 and SDSF question
Not
Hi group,
I have a light - probably trivia by now - question for those of you who have
been around a while. My earliest experience with IBM disk was 3380s. They ran
3 phase power, and if the phases weren't cabled correctly, the machine wouldn't
power up. I seem to recall hearing stories of (
Yup, that's what it means. systeM.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Charles Mills
Sent: Monday, June 22, 2020 12:49 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: [External] Re: How display amount of real storage?
Playing around, I see that /D M with no =an
Who's maintaining your z9? Is that still supported by IBM?
I know that years ago at a prior site, we had a couple HP-branded Hitachi boxes
that we were migrating off, and we went to a third party service contract for
the HP disk. When an HDA failed, I actually swapped it out and sent it to t
Unfortunately, yes, a bit. I only have to deal with the mainframe connector
and at this point it's only used for reporting but they're looking at making it
do a bunch more.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Ron
Wells
Sent: Thursday, July 2, 2020 7:29
s what concerns me...too me it is a BREECH of security
Want to stay off list.. my email is ron.we...@omf.com
They only mentioned a exit/api needs to be installed >> bother me ... trying to
get pros/cons and what others have experienced..
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discuss
Hi Peter,
I don't think anybody answered this question. With modern (read: emulated)
boxes I've been told the location of the VTOC/VTOCIX/VVDS don't matter anymore.
Back in the SLED days I was a stickler for placing the VTOC & IX 1/3 of the
way into the volume, right next to each other to tr
Hi Allan,
Nope, he meant MB. The number Rob is talking about it thruput. You pay for
the capacity of the pipeline for ingesting data into the VTS in 100 MB/second
increments.
Rex
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Allan Staller
Sent: Monday, July 6,
Hi List,
As the subject says, I'm looking for a current URL where I can find the latest
version (whatever version that is) of the PD Tools Studio software. Supposedly
this software is a free download for anybody who has IBM debug tool or
FileManager. We have FileManager and I have developers
: IBM Mainframe Discussion List on behalf of
Pommier, Rex
Sent: Monday, July 6, 2020 4:08:44 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: trying to find IBM problem determination tools studio for downloading
**CAUTION EXTERNAL EMAIL**
**DO NOT open attachments or click on links from unknown sende
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Paul Gilmartin
Sent: Monday, July 6, 2020 5:57 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: [External] Re: Using SSH and SFTP from Windows to z/OS using
authorized_keys ???
On Mon, 6 Jul 2020 16:12:59 -0600, Grant Taylor
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
John McKown
Sent: Tuesday, July 7, 2020 8:58 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: [External] Re: Storage & tape question
On Tue, Jul 7, 2020 at 8:19 AM Jackson, Rob
wrote:
> Fun little note on RAID: it is fallib
Regarding the second disk failing while the first was rebuilding, I've heard
more than once that a second failure in a RAID array shortly after the first,
while the rebuild is happening is not that uncommon. Something about the
sudden extra stress on the rest of the drives in the RAID set due t
Hi,
Can somebody give me a definitive definition of the NOJTC and JTC compiler
options in 6.3? I'm not seeing it in the COBOL reference or any COBOL manual
for that matter, yet it shows up on the option list when we compile a program:
NOFLAGSTD
HGPR(PRESERVE)
NOINITCHECK
stion
Not I.
There is a May, 2020 update to the P/G and it's not in there.
Charles
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Pommier, Rex
Sent: Wednesday, July 8, 2020 2:11 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: COBOL 6.
ssage-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Pommier, Rex
Sent: Wednesday, July 8, 2020 3:09 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: [External] Re: COBOL 6.3 compiler options question
I'm kind of hoping Captain COBOL will see my reque
Obvious questions would be
1) do you have some kind of filter on screens 2 or 3 of the selection criteria?
2) old CDS name?
3) using a saved list instead of generating a new one for the source?
If none of these things are it, may I suggest showing us your volume selection
entry panel?
Rex
---
'ACTIVE'
(fully specified or 'Active') Use ENTER to Perform Selection; Use DOWN
Command to View next Selection Panel;
Use HELP Command for Help; Use END Command to Exit.
On Thu, 9 Jul 2020 20:03:33 + "Pommier, Rex"
wrote:
:>Obvious questions would be
:&g
Thanks, Tom!
Rex
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Tom
Ross
Sent: Thursday, July 9, 2020 8:39 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: [External] COBOL 6.3 compiler options question
>Can somebody give me a definitive definition of the NOJTC and JTC
>c
Or, if not, I would hope the OP would be getting a zillion "unauthorized"
messages from people trying to update the master catalog.
Rex
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Bruce Lightsey
Sent: Friday, July 10, 2020 11:15 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Ron,
Let me rephrase that for you. So many words, so much... Blowing Snow.
I like the first line of the last paragraph, which is a Gartner quote from last
year:
"The value gained by moving applications from the traditional enterprise
platform onto the next 'bright, shiny thing' rarely p
A kilogram may not technically be a weight, but if not the whole world, at
least a large percentage of the world uses it as such. Looking at a package of
dried fruit in front of me and it says net weight 340 grams which I believe
translates to .34 kilograms.
Rex
-Original Message-
F
Nice catch, Joe.
Charles,
I would agree about a customer-facing process not generating messages upon
termination. However, the FTP daemon isn't "quite" that bad. Just for
curiosity, I tried to start a second FTPD on my sandbox. It did what it was
supposed to do, started the FTPD1 daemon and
Radoslaw,
Speed limits are different in the States based on which state you're in. Each
state can set its own speed limit. I am in South Dakota, and most smaller 2
lane roads are 55 MPH. Many of the state 2 lane roads are 65, and the
interstates have an 80 MPH speed limit, the equivalent of
Radoslaw,
The announcement letter says the planned availability date for the enhancements
is September 15. I believe the documentation will be available on that date as
well. In your note below, you quoted them " and will be available at planned
availability in the "Library" section of Resour
may change rules.
5. Most document in huge library are not needed for years, but you never know
when something is needed...
6. I like this book and I browse/read it. You may call it deviation, but this
is part of education about the machines. ;-)
Regards
--
Radoslaw Skorupka
Lodz, Pol
Hmm, guess I don't exist. LOL Never had a twitter account and don't want one.
Rex
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Frank Swarbrick
Sent: Monday, August 31, 2020 4:39 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: [External] Re: Dovetail/Kirk Wolf?
If o
Hi all,
Can anybody get into ShopZ? I was there a half hour ago now I just get a blank
screen. Literally - a white blank page.
Thanks,
Rex
The information contained in this message is confidential, protected from
disclosure and may be legally privileged. If the reader of this message is n
And I placed and received one earlier today as well. Downloaded it and
realized I had the wrong PTF so went back to ShopZ to order the right one, and
got (and still get) blank screen. Tried new browser instance, next step -
reboot. :-(
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussio
.
_
Dave Jousma
AVP | Director, Technology Engineering
Fifth Third Bank | 1830 East Paris Ave, SE | MD RSCB2H | Grand Rapids, MI
49546
616.653.8429 | fax: 616.653.2717
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Pommier, Rex
Sent: Thursday
I know this is a long shot but did you check your storage array to make sure
there wasn't a hiccup in it that momentarily disabled the SCM?
Rex
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Mark Jacobs
Sent: Friday, September 4, 2020 7:00 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.
A265I 50% OF LOCAL PAGE DATA SET SPACE IS ALLOCATED
Mark Jacobs
Sent from ProtonMail, Swiss-based encrypted email.
GPG Public Key -
https://api.protonmail.ch/pks/lookup?op=get&search=markjac...@protonmail.com
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
On Friday, September 4, 2020 8:54 AM, Pommier, Re
Hi List,
I have a question that has puzzled me on and off for years regarding the work
selection criteria for the JES2 spool offload facility. That is the use of the
slash. I get the part about criteria left of the slash being required, i.e. if
you have JOBNAME=ABCDE and WS=(JOB/) only output
OBNAME to the left or
right of the slash in more detail.
--Roger
On Fri, Sep 4, 2020 at 11:25 AM Pommier, Rex
wrote:
> Hi List,
>
> I have a question that has puzzled me on and off for years regarding
> the work selection criteria for the JES2 spool offload facility. That
> is th
Bill,
If UI70029 supercedes UI69028, then yes, the code correction in UI69028 is
included.
Rex
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Bill Giannelli
Sent: Thursday, September 17, 2020 9:28 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: [External] MEPL showing
Unlike PLPA, it is subject to page out.
Are you saying that PLPA pages are fixed and can't be paged out? Isn't that
what the first P in PLPA means - pageable? The FLPA modules are page fixed and
not subject to page-outs.
Rex
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
all paging rate compared with modules in other
libraries."
https://www.ibm.com/support/knowledgecenter/en/SSLTBW_2.1.0/com.ibm.zos.v2r1.ieae100/plpae.htm
Joe
On Mon, Sep 21, 2020 at 7:57 AM Pommier, Rex
wrote:
>Unlike PLPA, it is subject to page out.
>
> Are you saying that
Thanks, Clark,
Hoping to see you at 15:15 Central time on Thursday. :-)
Rex
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Clark Morris
Sent: Tuesday, September 22, 2020 10:36 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: [External] BOF on COBOL and the systems progra
Are they recording BOFs or just regularly scheduled sessions?
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Richards, Robert B.
Sent: Tuesday, September 22, 2020 1:34 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: [External] Re: BOF on COBOL and the systems programmer at
ex
-Original Message-
From: Clark Morris
Sent: Tuesday, September 22, 2020 4:44 PM
To: Pommier, Rex
Subject: Re: [External] BOF on COBOL and the systems programmer at SHARE
[Default] On 22 Sep 2020 10:22:36 -0700, in bit.listserv.ibm-main
rpomm...@sfgmembers.com (Pommier, Rex) wrote:
>Tha
Hello listers,
I'm apparently having a case of brain-drain. Is there an easy way to display
the currently used master JCL? I know I can look at LINKLIB and PARMLIB and
see what's there, but is there a way of displaying what's actually running? I
thought at one point in time I could see it in
gt; -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
> Pommier, Rex
> Sent: Wednesday, May 29, 2019 3:10 PM
> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
> Subject: (External):master JCL
>
> Hello listers,
>
> I'm apparently having a case of brain-drain. Is t
I have been under the impression it stands for External Security Manager, of
which the "big 3" would be RACF, ACF2, Top Secret.
Rex
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Tom
Brennan
Sent: Thursday, May 30, 2019 10:21 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject
Are you using NPFVTAM and NPFQMGR? If so, are they running?
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Tony Thigpen
Sent: Thursday, May 30, 2019 9:50 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: [External] Re: Need a second set of eyes to look at my NPF settings
Thanks, Sue, for all you do to keep the documentation usable. :-)
Rex
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Susan Shumway
Sent: Friday, May 31, 2019 8:28 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: [External] Re: ads on Knowledge Center?
Hi all,
Yikes, than
John,
No spares in the array? Or did a fail-over fail as well? If no spares, that
sounds more like a bone-headed management move to try to save a couple bucks.
Not absolving the admin from responsibility but it sounds like a bigger
problem.
Rex
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainfr
John,
There is nothing "efficient and cost effective" in eliminating brain trust
material and people who are willing/able to dig in and use the tools available.
I've seen firsthand (as I'm sure, many on this list) the short term "gain" and
long term crippling of a company by doing just that -
Bill,
Presuming your DB2 12 install will be going into its own SMP/E environment and
new target/distribution libraries, as soon as you have a successful base APPLY,
you should be able to accept them. As a new install of a new release, what
reason would you have to try to do a RESTORE? Doing
DB2V11 FMIDS.
HTH,
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Pommier, Rex
Sent: Monday, July 1, 2019 10:21 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: [External] Re: zOSMF software validation looking for *.F files
Bill,
Presuming your DB2 12 install will be
: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: [External] Re: zOSMF software validation looking for *.F files
Perhaps that will solve the OP's problem.
Run the accept w/NOPURGE and then manually delete the RELFILES.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Pommier, R
1 - 100 of 1143 matches
Mail list logo
