Tom, No problem. I wasn't very clear in my comments. Kind of like wanting the computer to have a "DWIW" command - do what I want. :-)
Rex -----Original Message----- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List <IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU> On Behalf Of Tom Marchant Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2019 6:12 PM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: [External] Re: Ancient DASD connectivity On Wed, 15 May 2019 20:31:55 +0000, Pommier, Rex wrote: >The point I was making was that IBM had some DASD subsystems for >large(r) customers with integrated controllers Oh. Sorry I misunderstood. Thanks for the clarification. The s/360 POO (available on bitsavers), says, "A control unit may be housed separately or it may be physically and logically integral with the I/O device." -- Tom Marchant ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN The information contained in this message is confidential, protected from disclosure and may be legally privileged. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient or an employee or agent responsible for delivering this message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, distribution, copying, or any action taken or action omitted in reliance on it, is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by replying to this message and destroy the material in its entirety, whether in electronic or hard copy format. Thank you. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
