"ALCON"?
This is uploading TO z/OS. That's why the question: there's no "records" per se
in a bytestream, so there's no clear way to decide where to put them.
See the replies by Charles and Michael. Charles notes that it's not *adding*
the CR/LF, it's *honoring* them, and Michael posited a plau
Thank you all for the replies. I didn't know until after I posted that we 2
LPARs on z/OS 2.2 on our existing z16. They have been there for almost a year
now without any issues. We are going to upgrade the z/OS 2.1 systems before
they are migrated to the new z16 later this year. And hope to als
ALCON:
"My question is: Can you devise a scenario where a binary transfer "with CR/LF"
makes sense?"
What if you are sending a file with a special purpose code page that FTP does
not (and possibly cannot) support to a Windows or whatever file system? A file
which is known not to contain any CR
(off topic, I'm sorry)
Usually I use €0.02, however we don't have EUR, it's still PLN.
And "my 0.02" is American saying, we (rarely) use "3 grosze" (3 cents).
BTW: there is PLN and there was PLZ.
PLZ is old currency, rarely used in common language, since it was
deprecated 30 years ago. 1PLN=1000
On 18/01/2025 8:42 am, Radoslaw Skorupka wrote:
Transfer between mainframe (z/OS) and distributed systems has never
been an issue or mess.
It is a mess, I submit as evidence the difficulty doing a round-trip
transfer and ending up with the same data you started with.
Fixed length records an
Certainly I agree with some of this. But to qualify #3 and to a lesser
extent #2, I'm a bit of a fussbudget about my hard-drive organization and my
web bookmarks; I have dozens of PDFs and hundreds of web sites but I can
usually put my hands on the one I want without much trouble. Some people
thi
I used to do that, and yes, I agree: When I read the whole manual there are
always parts that confuse me, either "what the heck does that mean?" or "why
would I ever want to do that?". But a year later, when I realize why I might
want to do that, I can go back to the manual and find that bit a
Classification: Confidential
It Depends.
AFAIK, all cipher suites are usuable until you implement TLS 1.3, This has a
restricted set of suites.
Why are you reluctant ti implement ICSF?
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Peter
Sent: Friday, January 17,
Hi,
You might think of BATCHPIPE ?
Arye
On Fri, Jan 17, 2025 at 4:15 PM rpinion865 <
042a019916dd-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote:
> I realized that last night, when I was thinking about my question. But I
> remember a Data in Virtual
> process back in the 1990s. You defined a dataset
You're assuming IND$FILE is behind this. I expect it is, in this case, but it
doesn't need to be. BINARY makes perfect sense if it's FTP behind the scenes.
Just sayin'. One might also argue that to folks more familiar with FTP, BINARY
also makes more sense than ASCII.
The whole file transfer ar
On Fri, 17 Jan 2025 at 10:40, Lennie Bradshaw
wrote:
> I think the session manager uses SVC screening.
>
This was discussed at some length here in Oct 2024. Jim Mulder pointed out
a page https://www.ibm.com/support/pages/apar/II02045 that hints at some
details, and contains references to a good
Hello
If there is No ICSF running then what ciphersuites can be used in TTLS
policy ?
Is there a default cipher which can be used in the TTLS policy?
Can someone please point me in the right direction?
Peter.
--
For IBM-MAIN s
On z/OS 3.1, I just created a 3 line member in my FB/80 CNTL PDS as:
000
11
22
That's unnumbered, so there's nothing but spaces to the right. I
downloaded to my PC with ASCII turned off but CRLF turned on. IND$FILE
(and the terminal emulator) gave me this:
00
W dniu 17.01.2025 o 20:32, Rebecca Martin pisze:
[...]
I do believe you that the 2.1 won't work at all, but I still hoping to test one
in the next few weeks; just to see what happens.
Please do and *share* results. I tested z9 and z/OS 2.2 several years
ago (it can be found in archives). It fai
My $0.02
Transfer between mainframe (z/OS) and distributed systems has never
been an issue or mess.
It is simple homework to do.
1. ASCII-EBCDIC translation. IMHO obvious. Note, we do *not* consider
national codepages. It will be mentioned later.
2. Record oriented dataset <-> byte oriented f
Classification: Confidential
Zloty's or USD?
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Radoslaw Skorupka
Sent: Friday, January 17, 2025 3:42 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: File transfer question
[CAUTION: This Email is from outside the Organizat
SVC Screening?
Lennie
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Seymour J Metz
Sent: 17 January 2025 04:31
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: REXX Outtrap Secret
Actually, TPUT has been trapable for decades. The details are left as an
exercise for the r
Session Manager. You need a different logon proc.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
עַם יִשְׂרָאֵל חַי
נֵ֣צַח יִשְׂרָאֵ֔ל לֹ֥א יְשַׁקֵּ֖ר
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List on behalf of
Lennie Bradshaw
Sent: Friday, January 17,
Hello,
BLSR supports only VSAM datasets, so optimizations of PDS/PDSE are discarded.
Some SMS features replace BLSR, but it is still used.
Best Regards
Ituriel do Nascimento Neto
z/OS System Programmer
Em quinta-feira, 16 de janeiro de 2025 às 17:27:31 BRT, rpinion865
<042a019916dd-d
I realized that last night, when I was thinking about my question. But I
remember a Data in Virtual
process back in the 1990s. You defined a dataset or datasets via an exit.
The Data in Virtual STC
would watch for a reader of the dataset and read the data set into storage and
retain it ther
Oy. If I'd ever left an IBM manual in the can, I would have heard about it from
my wife!
It is an interesting shift, though--we've dropped several magazines because we
just don't read them in The Library like we used to. Contributing to the death
of the industry, I know, but...
-Original M
Sad, but gone are the days when we could leave reading material in the
bathroom
Now days, we just take our device in and watch YouTube instead.
Tony Thigpen
Lionel B Dyck wrote on 1/16/25 3:17 PM:
The key is for those who RTFM - which sadly is rarely the case.
I last read the pubs many y
That is what I was looking for, SMSPDSE/SMSPDSE1.
"Confidentially doc, I am the wabbit."
Bugs Bunny
Sent with Proton Mail secure email.
On Friday, January 17th, 2025 at 10:22 AM, Radoslaw Skorupka
<0471ebeac275-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote:
> In a nutshell: use PDSE, not PDS and
In a nutshell: use PDSE, not PDS and that's all.
We can mention VLF, LLA, DLF, Hiperbatch, BLSR and maybe some ISV
products, but IMHO none of them could help in your scenario.
Why PDSE
Better directory search
Caching (that's why it's broken when shared outside of sysplex boundaries)
--
Radosl
I believe you are talking about Hiperbatch, which copies a sequential dataset
to memory to be read in parallel by several users. Not for PDS or PDSE.
It was a very nice feature and provided an incredible boost in performance, but
it worked only in a single z/OS (Monoplex). No support for Parallel
Can you cache the library in VLF (not LLA) without changes to the applications
that uses the library?
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
rpinion865
Sent: Thursday, January 16, 2025 2:27 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Caching of a Non-loadlib li
I think the session manager uses SVC screening.
Lennie
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of
Seymour J Metz
Sent: 17 January 2025 13:58
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: REXX Outtrap Secret
Session Manager. You need a different logon proc.
--
Shmue
Terminal emulator scraping! If you can see it, you can grab it :)
But yeah, I would have never thought of Session manager.
On 1/17/2025 5:58 AM, Seymour J Metz wrote:
Session Manager. You need a different logon proc.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
עַם יִשְׂרָאֵל חַי
נ
Hi
Rob Scott was helping me with this
From what I remember the MIPR
Gets called a repeated number of times
Until there are no more modules
The TCB I place in the TCBADDR
Is I get PSATOLD then I get the job step TCB
TCBJSTCB
No whether I return a zero in register 15 or non zero
My MIP
>The key is for those who RTFM - which sadly is rarely the case.
>
>> I last read the pubs many years ago when it was hardcopy - with
>> softcopy I typically read sections instead of cover to cover - another
>> failing of online pubs.
Having been involved with many publications over the years and
I think the problem is that the option is confusingly named. The question is
"should IND$FILE translate the data from ASCII to EBCDIC? Yes or No." The word
"binary" implies data that might well contain all 256 possible 8-bit values.
That might not be the case at all. Perhaps it is all valid ASCI
It's a lot cleaner than screen scraping.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
עַם יִשְׂרָאֵל חַי
נֵ֣צַח יִשְׂרָאֵ֔ל לֹ֥א יְשַׁקֵּ֖ר
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List on behalf of Tom
Brennan
Sent: Friday, January 17, 2025 10:45 A
Maybe, but there is VTIOC code to support it. Is it possible that the old
stand-alone version used SVC screening but the current version does not?
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
עַם יִשְׂרָאֵל חַי
נֵ֣צַח יִשְׂרָאֵ֔ל לֹ֥א יְשַׁקֵּ֖ר
For some of my "books" I had little coloured tabs/labels on pages... I
knew the red one half way down was the ... command. The red one at the
top was for ... The book opened at the frequently used pages. I use a
highlighter on important phrases.
A month after I joined IBM, I took the CMS co
On Fri, 17 Jan 2025 11:14:51 -0600, Charles Mills wrote:
>I think the problem is that the option is confusingly named. The question is
>"should IND$FILE translate the data from ASCII to EBCDIC? Yes or No." The word
>"binary" implies data that might well contain all 256 possible 8-bit values.
35 matches
Mail list logo
