Perhaps this will help ...
https://www.ibm.com/support/knowledgecenter/en/SSLTBW_2.2.0/com.ibm.zos.v2r2.cbcpx01/cexample.htm
Joe
On Thu, Aug 22, 2019 at 10:49 PM Joseph Reichman
wrote:
> Hi
>
> All of the code I have on my system is assembler. The Code is a TCP/IP
> Serve
> to a Windows Client
https://www.ibm.com/support/knowledgecenter/en/SSLTBW_2.1.0/com.ibm.zos.v2r1.ceea400/cee142446.htm
Thanks I think I need to do this no ?
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Joe
Monk
Sent: Friday, August 23, 2019 5:16 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subj
Have a look here... Youre calling 64bit C from assembler correct?
https://www.ibm.com/support/knowledgecenter/en/SSLTBW_2.2.0/com.ibm.zos.v2r2.ceeam00/clamcal.htm
You'll need to bracket the code with the PRLG and EPIL macros detailed
there as well.
Joe
On Fri, Aug 23, 2019 at 5:34 AM Joseph Rei
The problem as in my original thread that CELQPRLG is NOT Main enabled or
rather CELQMAIN
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Joe
Monk
Sent: Friday, August 23, 2019 6:14 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: LE 64 bit no main assembler
Right you need a stub main. If you look at the section I referred you to,
right below that is the preinit services section.
Joe
On Fri, Aug 23, 2019 at 7:18 AM Joseph Reichman
wrote:
> The problem as in my original thread that CELQPRLG is NOT Main enabled or
> rather CELQMAIN
>
>
>
> -Orig
You are referring to your 5:15 post got it either way my code till this point
has been all NON-LE Assembler to call that stub AMODE 64 C main I Need to
LINKX AMODE64OK=YES right ?
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Joe
Monk
Sent: Friday, August
No SQL or SKLM expert but does this ID exist on the mainframe and server, same
password requirements ?
Carmen Vitullo
- Original Message -
From: "Rex Pommier"
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Sent: Thursday, August 22, 2019 4:27:22 PM
Subject: ISKLM problems - kind of related to mai
Are you using Installation Manager? We installed SKLM on a SLES 12 box
for our DS8Ks and IM is the best way to install.
On Fri, Aug 23, 2019 at 7:42 AM Carmen Vitullo wrote:
> No SQL or SKLM expert but does this ID exist on the mainframe and server,
> same password requirements ?
>
>
>
> Carm
According to the "Summary of changes for z/OS UNIX System Services Planning for
Version 2 Release 4 (V2R4)" (see
https://www.ibm.com/support/knowledgecenter/SSLTBW_2.4.0/com.ibm.zos.v2r4.bpxb200/bpxb2soc24.htm),
copy on write for fork() has been removed from z/OS. It will be interesting to
benc
When using the ISPF "DISPLAY" service, I want my program to process the PF
key without having a command associated with the PFKEY.
How do I tell ISPF to simply return to my program and let me do the
processing?
John P. Baker
Yes i think that is correct.
Joe
On Fri, Aug 23, 2019 at 8:18 AM Joseph Reichman
wrote:
> You are referring to your 5:15 post got it either way my code till this
> point has been all NON-LE Assembler to call that stub AMODE 64 C main I
> Need to LINKX AMODE64OK=YES right ?
>
>
>
> -Origin
Now I know why dingus has a C compiler
LE XL C very user unfriendly
Thanks for your help
> On Aug 23, 2019, at 9:33 AM, Joe Monk wrote:
>
> Yes i think that is correct.
>
> Joe
>
> On Fri, Aug 23, 2019 at 8:18 AM Joseph Reichman
> wrote:
>
>> You are referring to your 5:15 post got
That is more of a challenge but doable. You have to:
1. create an ISPF command table entry for the PF Key command (e.g. FIND) and
in the command table have the zctact value set to a variable (e.g. &myfind)
2. in your code set the myfind value to PASSTHRU and at that point your
application will pr
The vendor can revoke his private/public key, generate a new
private/public key pair and - hopefully this time - publish only the
public key.
BTW I believe a public key can be associated with more than one PGP
private key, although doing so would still not explain the vendor's
publishing a privat
The Percent29 at the end breaks the URL. Is your e-mail software doing that
automatically?
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List on behalf of
Jerry Callen
Sent: Friday, August 23, 2019 9:24 AM
To
To deal with PF keys, ISPF panels have the .PFKEY variable (notice period)
that contains the PF key pressed. You could use this variable in the panel
)PROC IF statement or simply copy it a variable passed to the program. As for
the command line variable (typically zcmd), you can ignore it, clea
Does that include TN3270? Does OSA-ICC support TLS? Once MVS is up, how do you
run SMCS consoles without TN3270?
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List on behalf of
Paul Gilmartin <000433f07816-
It seems to me to be a management problem/decision.
The mgmt challenge is that work from off-site is not a "one size fits all"
matter. Some folks will love the flexibility and work even more because of
it, most about the same, some will be tempted to slack. The challenge is
how to measure and mana
I agree!
FWIW - debugging performance of forked Unix process startup/overhead is a
mess - we had one customer who was seeing terrible performance when
fork/execing tiny little shell processes that did practically nothing. It
was only happening on one of their LPARs. The IBM Support center was
Hi Carmen,
No, the ID doesn't exist on the mainframe but I don't think it needs to be
there. I'm currently running ISKLM 2.5 and the DB2 ID that is defined with
the older ISKLM exists only on the ISKLM 2.5 servers as a local admin. Since
this DB2 ID is used only on the SKLM server for local
Hi Michael,
Yes, I'm using the GUI install and selecting IM, DB2, WAS, and SKLM. The
process installs IM successfully, then apparently installs DB2 successfully but
then chokes with the SQL error doing some post install work to DB2. The reason
I'm saying it appears to install DB2 successfully
On Fri, 23 Aug 2019 10:41:55 -0500, Kirk Wolf wrote:
>I agree!
>
>FWIW - debugging performance of forked Unix process startup/overhead is a
>mess - we had one customer who was seeing terrible performance when
>fork/execing tiny little shell processes that did practically nothing. It
>was only h
One would certainly hope that "copying" an address space for purposes of
fork() would not require paging it all in. That would be horrible, and I
seriously doubt that it works that way.
On Fri, Aug 23, 2019 at 12:26 PM Paul Gilmartin <
000433f07816-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote:
> On
> The Percent29 at the end breaks the URL. Is your e-mail software doing that
> automatically?
I created the post directly from the listserv's web interface - no email
software involved. I *did* have a closing paren at the end of the URL, since I
was in the middle of a parenthesized phrase; it
The next meeting of the DC/MD/VA Linux & z/VM User Group will be held on Monday
16 Sep at the Broadcom office in Herndon. Details will follow but this is the
draft agenda:
- The Seriousness of Securing your VM Environment Using Audit Data – Yvonne
Demeritt, Broadcom
- Attacking Encryption: Unde
On Thu, 22 Aug 2019 at 22:47, Kirk Wolf wrote:
> BUT: if this vendor is giving you its server's private key, then the server
> is *not* secure. This is because when you connect to that server you don't
> know if you are really talking to the vendor or someone else, since anyone
> with the privat
We don't have C, I'd like to do something like this in REXX and run it from
~/.profile or /etc/profile, but I can't figure out how to set the TZ
environment variable in the REXX.
Dana
On Sun, 18 Aug 2019 15:08:25 +0800, David Crayford wrote:
>I once wrote some C code that sets the TZ, _TZ
/* get the local offset from GMT */
days_diff = mvsvar('SYMDEF','LYR4') - mvsvar('SYMDEF','YR4')
if days_diff = 0 then
days_diff = mvsvar('SYMDEF','LJDAY') - mvsvar('SYMDEF','JDAY')
hours_diff = mvsvar('SYMDEF','LHR') -,
mvsvar('SYMDEF','HR') + 24 * days_diff
min_diff = right(abs(mvsvar('SYMDEF',
On Fri, 23 Aug 2019 13:23:04 -0500, Jerry Callen wrote:
>> The Percent29 at the end breaks the URL. Is your e-mail software doing that
>> automatically?
>
>I created the post directly from the listserv's web interface - no email
>software involved. I *did* have a closing paren at the end of the
On Fri, 23 Aug 2019 14:46:03 -0400, Joe Monk wrote:
>/* get the local offset from GMT */
>days_diff = mvsvar('SYMDEF','LYR4') - mvsvar('SYMDEF','YR4')
>if days_diff = 0 then
>days_diff = mvsvar('SYMDEF','LJDAY') - mvsvar('SYMDEF','JDAY')
>
>hours_diff = mvsvar('SYMDEF','LHR') -,
>mvsvar('SYMDEF','
I am told that the reasons were:
(1) It consumed a lot of ESQA for the RSM control
blocks that manage the shared pages. (However, that is
no longer an issue because those control blocks were
moved to the PFT data space later in z/OS 2.4).
(2) The performance was no better than
> I believe a public key can be associated with more than one PGP private key
I don't know PGP at all but for basic asymmetrical or public/private key
encryption, the public and private keys are basically one to one with each
other. You generate a pair, both halves at once. Although I guess it i
32 matches
Mail list logo
