Yes i think that is correct.

Joe

On Fri, Aug 23, 2019 at 8:18 AM Joseph Reichman <reichman...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> You are referring to  your 5:15 post got it either way my code till this
> point has been all NON-LE Assembler to call that stub AMODE 64  C main I
> Need to LINKX AMODE64OK=YES right ?
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List <IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU> On Behalf
> Of Joe Monk
> Sent: Friday, August 23, 2019 8:08 AM
> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
> Subject: Re: LE 64 bit no main assembler ?
>
> Right you need a stub main. If you look at the section I referred you to,
> right below that is the preinit services section.
>
> Joe
>
> On Fri, Aug 23, 2019 at 7:18 AM Joseph Reichman <reichman...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > The problem as in my original thread that CELQPRLG is  NOT Main
> > enabled or rather CELQMAIN
> >
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List <IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU> On
> > Behalf Of Joe Monk
> > Sent: Friday, August 23, 2019 6:14 AM
> > To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
> > Subject: Re: LE 64 bit no main assembler ?
> >
> > Have a look here... Youre calling 64bit C from assembler correct?
> >
> >
> > https://www.ibm.com/support/knowledgecenter/en/SSLTBW_2.2.0/com.ibm.zo
> > s.v2r2.ceeam00/clamcal.htm
> >
> > You'll need to bracket the code with the PRLG and EPIL macros detailed
> > there as well.
> >
> > Joe
> >
> > On Fri, Aug 23, 2019 at 5:34 AM Joseph Reichman
> > <reichman...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > https://www.ibm.com/support/knowledgecenter/en/SSLTBW_2.1.0/com.ibm.
> > > zo
> > > s.v2r1.ceea400/cee142446.htm
> > >
> > > Thanks I think I need to do this no ?
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List <IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU> On
> > > Behalf Of Joe Monk
> > > Sent: Friday, August 23, 2019 5:16 AM
> > > To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
> > > Subject: Re: LE 64 bit no main assembler ?
> > >
> > > Perhaps this will help ...
> > >
> > >
> > > https://www.ibm.com/support/knowledgecenter/en/SSLTBW_2.2.0/com.ibm.
> > > zo
> > > s.v2r2.cbcpx01/cexample.htm
> > >
> > > Joe
> > >
> > > On Thu, Aug 22, 2019 at 10:49 PM Joseph Reichman
> > > <reichman...@gmail.com <mailto:reichman...@gmail.com> >
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hi
> > > >
> > > > All of the code I have on my system is assembler. The Code is a
> > > > TCP/IP Serve to a Windows Client. I had similar functions in
> > > > Windows and the Mainframe
> > > >
> > > > So I figure I would use the windows code on the mainframe. The
> > > > code use a lot of storage so I decided to go AMODE 64 where by the
> > > > malloc would be from above the bar
> > > >
> > > > I had an Assembler CEEPCALL in 31 bit that worked calling the C
> > > > Dll
> > > >
> > > > When I went to change it 64 bit both the Calling Assembler and the
> > > > C DLL., I got U4093 reason X'218' the 64 bit Assembler
> > > >
> > > > I saw  this thread from IBMMAIN from a few years ago
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > https://www.mail-archive.com/ibm-main@listserv.ua.edu/msg55945.htm
> > > > l
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > It seems from the thread that CELQPRLG and CELQCALL Cant Call the
> > > > 64 BIT C Dll
> > > >
> > > > And I would need the Assembler program to Call a 64 BIT  C main
> > > > program to Call the C Dll
> > > >
> > > > As I recognize a few of the names on the thread wonder if any one
> > > > can confirm that a) The 64 bit assembler can not call 64 bit C DLL
> > > > b) the Assembler can call a 64 bit C main which would then call
> > > > the
> > > > 64 bit C Dll
> > > >
> > > > thanks
> > > >
> > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > --
> > > > -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
> > > > send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu
> > > > <mailto:lists...@listserv.ua.edu>
> > > with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
> > > >
> > >
> > > --------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
> > > send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu
> > > <mailto:lists...@listserv.ua.edu> with the
> > > message: INFO IBM-MAIN
> > >
> > > --------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
> > > send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO
> > > IBM-MAIN
> > >
> >
> > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send
> > email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
> >
> > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send
> > email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
> >
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email
> to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
> send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
>

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Reply via email to