Re: Abend 052-512

2019-02-10 Thread Peter Relson
You would not get 052-512 on AXSET. It is issued only on ETCON. Peter Relson z/OS Core Technology Design -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message

Re: Abend 052-512

2019-02-10 Thread esst...@juno.com
I can't provide the entire program due to some contractual agreements. So here is what I can show.There is only one AXSET and one LXRES macro in this module.ANd yes the Dump has AXSET using R0, I did subsequently change it to use R1. *-

Re: Abend 052-512

2019-02-10 Thread Joe Monk
Problem 1: Youre not setting R13 to the 18 word save area required by the macro... Input register information The AXSET macro is sensitive to the SYSSTATE macro with the OSREL=ZOSV1R6 parameter - If the caller has issued the SYSSTATE macro with the OSREL=ZOSV1R6 parameter (Version 1 Release

Re: Abend 052-512

2019-02-10 Thread Joe Monk
Peter, AXSET specifically says it is subject to 052... ABEND codes - 052 - 053 https://www.ibm.com/support/knowledgecenter/en/SSLTBW_2.3.0/com.ibm.zos.v2r3.ieaa100/iea3a1_AXSET_Set_authorization_index.htm Joe On Sun, Feb 10, 2019 at 8:12 AM Peter Relson wrote: > You would not get

EDT tokens while IODFing

2019-02-10 Thread Peter
Hi This is just a general question I was building a production IODF and received warning message about not assigning tokens to EDTs. How significant are these tokens ? How do they really work ? Peter -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe

Re: Abend 052-512

2019-02-10 Thread Joe Monk
One other thing ... The AX used in the AXSET macro must have been previously AXRES'd prior to being used in the AXSET macro "The caller can use the value returned by the system as an AX through the AXSET macro, or as an extended authorization index (EAX) through the ETDEF, ETCRE, and ETCON mac

What is the bit that causes the bypassing of dataset ENQ

2019-02-10 Thread Charles Mills
IIRC there is a bit that causes dataset allocation to bypass the normal ENQ. It is used, for example, by backup programs. Can anyone share the name of the bit flag? I searched TCB, ASCB and JSCB. Don't worry, I'm not going to use it willy-nilly. I'm not going to code it at all. It is for a

Re: What is the bit that causes the bypassing of dataset ENQ

2019-02-10 Thread Seymour J Metz
Put the program in the PPT with the proper attributes. -- Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3 From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List on behalf of Charles Mills Sent: Sunday, February 10, 2019 1:50 PM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject:

Re: Abend 052-512

2019-02-10 Thread Jim Mulder
052, yes. 052-512, no. The original poster should use the SYSTRACE in a dump of the 052 abend, and find the PC for ETCON which precedes the *SVCED for the 052 abend, to see who did the failing ETCON. Jim Mulder z/OS Diagnosis, Design, Development, Test IBM Corp. Poughkeepsie NY "

Re: Abend 052-512

2019-02-10 Thread Binyamin Dissen
You are making very bad assumptions. Looking at your mini-dump I can see that an ETCON is failing. Not the AXSET. Why did you assume that the AXSET failed? In the small section of code you provided I do not see initialization of the LXRES list form. I presume you equally failed to initialize the

Re: XMIT Manager and CP1047 (or rather CP1046.9921875)

2019-02-10 Thread Seymour J Metz
Every release that I have ever used has had issues with translation, ever since the original ASCII support for tape. Do you mean UTF-8 or UTF-EBCDIC (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/UTF-EBCDIC)? -- Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3 Fro

Re: Abend 052-512

2019-02-10 Thread esst...@juno.com
.Thanks to everyone who responded . First My Register 13 is pointed to a proper save area, It also points to a Getmain area. . . In my original post I assumed that the ABend occurred on the AXSET, I suspected that since I did not see and log records (WTO). After each macro is issued, I invoke a ro

Re: What is the bit that causes the bypassing of dataset ENQ

2019-02-10 Thread Charles Mills
A kind soul offline points out S99NORES. (No wonder I couldn't find it in the TCB.) Charles -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf Of Charles Mills Sent: Sunday, February 10, 2019 10:51 AM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject:

Re: What is the bit that causes the bypassing of dataset ENQ

2019-02-10 Thread Walt Farrell
On Sun, 10 Feb 2019 14:08:15 -0800, Charles Mills wrote: >A kind soul offline points out S99NORES. > >(No wonder I couldn't find it in the TCB.) It also would have helped if you'd said you were interested in -dynamic- data set allocation, rather than simply data set allocation. It changes the a

Re: Hmc for z as a virtual appliance?

2019-02-10 Thread Timothy Sipples
Mike Schwab: >What serial number does he use if he doesn't have a z## processor? >He only wants to test with the HMC. There's another important question, a technical question: how does he plug an IBM Z/IBM LinuxONE Hardware Management Console (HMC) into a ZPDT? Answer: He doesn't. The ZPDT does no

Re: Friday history query

2019-02-10 Thread Timothy Sipples
I'll guess the letter relates in some way to the IBM Data Processing Division's Government, Education and Medical (GEM) Region. The GEM Region was an IBM sales and marketing organization for about five years from 1966 to 1971. It catered to IBM customers in those industries and was headquartered in

DEQ dynamically

2019-02-10 Thread Jake Anderson
Hi Is it possible to deallocate a dataset without recycling address space. The dataset is users one and for some reason I would like to know if we can Dynamically remove it from allocation Jake -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / sign