Re: simple rexx sort

2017-09-24 Thread Martin Packer
From: "Joel C. Ewing" To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Date: 23/09/2017 23:29 Subject: Re: simple rexx sort Sent by:IBM Mainframe Discussion List On 09/19/2017 07:54 AM, Dyck, Lionel B. (TRA) wrote: > I needed a simple sort for the words in a string and came up

Re: simple rexx sort

2017-09-23 Thread Joel C. Ewing
On 09/19/2017 07:54 AM, Dyck, Lionel B. (TRA) wrote: > I needed a simple sort for the words in a string and came up with this - hope > it helps others. There are probably better ways to do this so feel free to > share: > > /* -- rexx * > | Simple bubble s

simple rexx sort

2017-09-20 Thread Larry K. Slaten
Here are a number of variations.  I am personally fond of the Heap Sort, it's not the fastest but it is never the slowest. /* REXX */ HSORTA: Procedure Expose A. /* REXX function Invoke as: HSORTA(occurs) Heapsort by J. W. J. Williams is a in place sorting algorithm whose worst-cas

simple rexx sort

2017-09-19 Thread Dyck, Lionel B. (TRA)
I needed a simple sort for the words in a string and came up with this - hope it helps others. There are probably better ways to do this so feel free to share: /* -- rexx * | Simple bubble sort for words in a string (array) | * --

Re: Rexx SORT (was: ... Job Scheduler ... )

2017-06-09 Thread Tom Marchant
On Thu, 8 Jun 2017 07:52:32 -0500, Edward Gould wrote: >TSO is dead TSO is dead, Long live TSO! -- Tom Marchant -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the

Re: Rexx SORT

2017-06-09 Thread R.S.
W dniu 2017-06-09 o 14:54, John McKown pisze: [...] ​If the ISPF people would port their code to be usable from an UNIX shell prompt, I'd have _no_ use for TSO again. What I vaguely envision is having ISPF use "curses" for a character user interface. The second phase would be to extend ISPF to us

Re: Rexx SORT (was: ... Job Scheduler ... )

2017-06-09 Thread John McKown
On Fri, Jun 9, 2017 at 12:30 AM, Edward Gould wrote: > ​ > > > Good question. One that has been asked many times. I have the impression > IBM is being mysterious here. We are pretty sure that there is no > development going on for current TSO and IBM is tight lipped on any > possible successor (i

Re: Replacement of TSO (was: Rexx SORT ...)

2017-06-08 Thread Elardus Engelbrecht
Edward Gould wrote: >>> TSO is dead, IBM wouldn’t offer a new product because it used TSO. What is >>> the IBM replacement and what is the migration path? I have no problem with >>> terminating TSO but the functions it provides are still needed. >Good question. One that has been asked many tim

Re: Rexx SORT (was: ... Job Scheduler ... )

2017-06-08 Thread Edward Gould
> On Jun 8, 2017, at 3:19 PM, Clark Morris wrote: > > [Default] On 8 Jun 2017 06:01:57 -0700, in bit.listserv.ibm-main > edgould1...@comcast.net (Edward Gould) wrote: > >>> On Jun 7, 2017, at 7:06 PM, Phil Smith wrote: >>> >>> Lionel Dyck wrote: If I recall the CMS/TSO Pipes is effectivel

Re: Rexx SORT (was: ... Job Scheduler ... )

2017-06-08 Thread Clark Morris
[Default] On 8 Jun 2017 06:01:57 -0700, in bit.listserv.ibm-main edgould1...@comcast.net (Edward Gould) wrote: >> On Jun 7, 2017, at 7:06 PM, Phil Smith wrote: >> >> Lionel Dyck wrote: >>> If I recall the CMS/TSO Pipes is effectively the same code that is >>> reassembled for z/VM or z/OS. Sadly

AW: Re: AW: Rexx SORT (was: ... Job Scheduler ... )

2017-06-08 Thread bernd.oppol...@t-online.de
--- Original-Nachricht --- Von: Nims,Alva John (Al) Betreff: Re: AW: Rexx SORT (was: ... Job Scheduler ... ) Datum: 08.06.2017, 14:59 Uhr An: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU No, z/OS REXX does not have a SORTSTEM function built-in. I currently have a STEMSORT function, but it is from a 3rd party vendor. Al

Re: AW: Rexx SORT (was: ... Job Scheduler ... )

2017-06-08 Thread Lizette Koehler
en > Sent: Thursday, June 08, 2017 1:54 AM > To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU > Subject: Re: AW: Rexx SORT (was: ... Job Scheduler ... ) > > Could you point me to the REXX list? > > Also, we have had a SORTSTEM function in VSE REXX for a LONG time. Does z/OS > not have SORTSTEM? >

Re: Rexx SORT (was: ... Job Scheduler ... )

2017-06-08 Thread Edward Gould
> On Jun 7, 2017, at 7:06 PM, Phil Smith wrote: > > Lionel Dyck wrote: >> If I recall the CMS/TSO Pipes is effectively the same code that is >> reassembled for z/VM or z/OS. Sadly it is a product that is charged for on >> z/OS but is included in z/VM at no charge. It should, imho, be included i

Re: AW: Rexx SORT (was: ... Job Scheduler ... )

2017-06-08 Thread Nims,Alva John (Al)
@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf Of Tony Thigpen Sent: Thursday, June 08, 2017 4:54 AM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: AW: Rexx SORT (was: ... Job Scheduler ... ) Could you point me to the REXX list? Also, we have had a SORTSTEM function in VSE REXX for a LONG time. Does z/OS not have SORTSTEM

Re: AW: Rexx SORT (was: ... Job Scheduler ... )

2017-06-08 Thread Edward Finnell
Using Catalist at _www.lsoft.com_ (http://www.lsoft.com) Found these: _rexxl...@listserv.uga.EDU_ (http://www.lsoft.com/scripts/wl.exe?SL1=REXXLIST&H=LISTSERV.UGA.EDU) (https://listserv.uga.edu/cgi-bin/wa?LIST=REXXLIST) REXX Programming discussion list (356 subscribers) _TSO-REXX@VM.MARI

Re: AW: Rexx SORT (was: ... Job Scheduler ... )

2017-06-08 Thread Tony Thigpen
:14 PM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: AW: Rexx SORT (was: ... Job Scheduler ... ) Paul Gilmartin wrote: Bernd.Oppolzer wrote: http://bernd-oppolzer.de/blog_20150115_151000.htm this Contains a REXX Procedure to sort a stem variable. See quicksort_nonrec o Of course. But why should i

Re: Rexx SORT (was: ... Job Scheduler ... )

2017-06-07 Thread Phil Smith
Paul Gilmartin asked: >Is that true for even the newest release? They're still testing it? John Hartmann may be retired but he ain't dead. >How does one transfer PIPE MODULE S from CMS to z/OS and get a usable >program object? Re-link it? I believe so. >Is it legal? Not sure. But check out t

Re: Rexx SORT (was: ... Job Scheduler ... )

2017-06-07 Thread Paul Gilmartin
On Wed, 7 Jun 2017 17:06:46 -0700, Phil Smith wrote: >Lionel Dyck wrote: >>If I recall the CMS/TSO Pipes is effectively the same code that is >>reassembled for z/VM or z/OS. Sadly it is a product that is charged for on >>z/OS but is included in z/VM at no charge. It should, imho, be included in

Re: Rexx SORT (was: ... Job Scheduler ... )

2017-06-07 Thread Phil Smith
Lionel Dyck wrote: >If I recall the CMS/TSO Pipes is effectively the same code that is reassembled >for z/VM or z/OS. Sadly it is a product that is charged for on z/OS but is >included in z/VM at no charge. It should, imho, be included in z/OS as a no >charge feature and really give the REXX use

Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: AW: Rexx SORT (was: ... Job Scheduler ... )

2017-06-07 Thread Dyck, Lionel B. (TRA)
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: AW: Rexx SORT (was: ... Job Scheduler ... ) On 2017-06-07, at 11:27, Nims,Alva John (Al) wrote: > This is getting to be like a discussion that was had on the REXX list > recently, as in it would be nice if there was an available PIPE t

Re: AW: Rexx SORT (was: ... Job Scheduler ... )

2017-06-07 Thread Paul Gilmartin
On 2017-06-07, at 11:27, Nims,Alva John (Al) wrote: > This is getting to be like a discussion that was had on the REXX list > recently, as in it would be nice if there was an available PIPE type of > command available, oh wait there is: > > The product where IBM has made a PIPE command availabl

Re: AW: Rexx SORT (was: ... Job Scheduler ... )

2017-06-07 Thread Nims,Alva John (Al)
: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: AW: Rexx SORT (was: ... Job Scheduler ... ) Please see this RFE: https://www.ibm.com/developerworks/rfe/execute?use_case=viewRfe&CR_ID=47699 -- Lionel B. Dyck -Original Mes

Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: Rexx SORT (was: ... Job Scheduler ... )

2017-06-07 Thread Dyck, Lionel B. (TRA)
MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf Of Paul Gilmartin Sent: Wednesday, June 07, 2017 12:57 PM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: Rexx SORT (was: ... Job Scheduler ... ) On 2017-06-07, at 11:31, Dyck, Lionel B. (TRA) wrote: > Please see this RFE: > https://www.ibm.com/develope

Re: Rexx SORT (was: ... Job Scheduler ... )

2017-06-07 Thread Paul Gilmartin
On 2017-06-07, at 11:31, Dyck, Lionel B. (TRA) wrote: > Please see this RFE: > https://www.ibm.com/developerworks/rfe/execute?use_case=viewRfe&CR_ID=47699 > That gives me: Oops, that's not right! Sorry, the page you're looking for cannot be displayed Please try again later. 500 Internal S

Re: AW: Rexx SORT (was: ... Job Scheduler ... )

2017-06-07 Thread Dyck, Lionel B. (TRA)
] On Behalf Of Nims,Alva John (Al) Sent: Wednesday, June 07, 2017 12:28 PM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: AW: Rexx SORT (was: ... Job Scheduler ... ) This is getting to be like a discussion that was had on the REXX list recently, as in it would be nice if there was an available

Re: AW: Rexx SORT (was: ... Job Scheduler ... )

2017-06-07 Thread Nims,Alva John (Al)
ailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf Of Elardus Engelbrecht Sent: Wednesday, June 07, 2017 1:14 PM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: AW: Rexx SORT (was: ... Job Scheduler ... ) Paul Gilmartin wrote: >Bernd.Oppolzer wrote: >>http://bernd-oppolzer.de/blog_20150115_151000.htm

Re: AW: Rexx SORT (was: ... Job Scheduler ... )

2017-06-07 Thread Elardus Engelbrecht
Paul Gilmartin wrote: >Bernd.Oppolzer wrote: >>http://bernd-oppolzer.de/blog_20150115_151000.htm >>this Contains a REXX Procedure to sort a stem variable. See quicksort_nonrec >o Of course. But why should it be necessary to reinvent the wheel when DFSORT >has vast capabilities not practical to d

Re: AW: Rexx SORT (was: ... Job Scheduler ... )

2017-06-07 Thread Paul Gilmartin
On Wed, 7 Jun 2017 08:12:47 +0200, bernd.oppol...@t-online.de wrote: >http://bernd-oppolzer.de/blog_20150115_151000.htm > . > >this Contains a REXX Procedure >to sort a stem variable. >See quicksort_nonrec > o Of course. But why should it be nece

AW: Rexx SORT (was: ... Job Scheduler ... )

2017-06-06 Thread bernd.oppol...@t-online.de
http://bernd-oppolzer.de/blog_20150115_151000.htm <http://bernd-oppolzer.de/blog_20150115_151000.htm> . this Contains a REXX Procedure to sort a stem variable. See quicksort_nonrec hth Kind regards Bernd --- Original-Nachricht --- Von: Paul Gilmartin Betreff: Rexx SORT (was: .

Rexx SORT (was: ... Job Scheduler ... )

2017-06-06 Thread Paul Gilmartin
On Wed, 7 Jun 2017 00:33:30 +, Rob Schramm wrote: >Address SORT > >is more what I was thinking. It is just such a commonly needed thing for >simple sorts i.e. >SORT 1 8 a > I'm guessing the arguments are a column range and Ascending? >Guess I am just lazy/annoyed when it comes to things th