[Default] On 8 Jun 2017 06:01:57 -0700, in bit.listserv.ibm-main edgould1...@comcast.net (Edward Gould) wrote:
>> On Jun 7, 2017, at 7:06 PM, Phil Smith <p...@voltage.com> wrote: >> >> Lionel Dyck wrote: >>> If I recall the CMS/TSO Pipes is effectively the same code that is >>> reassembled for z/VM or z/OS. Sadly it is a product that is charged for on >>> z/OS but is included in z/VM at no charge. It should, imho, be included in >>> z/OS as a no charge feature and really give the REXX users a tool to be >>> more productive and thus make z/OS more usable. >> >> More than "effectively": IIRC, the same load module works in either OS. It >> can tell where it is and reacts accordingly. >> >> And yes, IBM should include it in the product; it could only help! The >> resistance to making z/OS more usable is going to be its downfall, I fear. >> >> And no, the web-based stuff isn't the answer-that makes it easier to >> administer, but doesn't help you get real work done. > >Phil: > >TSO is dead, IBM wouldnt offer a new product because it used TSO. What is the IBM replacement and what is the migration path? I have no problem with terminating TSO but the functions it provides are still needed. Clark Morris > >Ed >> >> ...phsiii >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
