Re: [SUSPECTED SPAM] Re: Job Posting

2020-01-12 Thread Adam Jacobvitz
62ea6-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> > Sent: Friday, January 10, 2020 1:31 PM > To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU > Subject: Re: [SUSPECTED SPAM] Re: Job Posting > > A good name implies good banking practices. > > Adam > > Sent from ProtonMail Mobile > > On Fri, Jan 1

Re: [SUSPECTED SPAM] Re: Job Posting

2020-01-12 Thread Seymour J Metz
9b762ea6-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> Sent: Friday, January 10, 2020 1:31 PM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: [SUSPECTED SPAM] Re: Job Posting A good name implies good banking practices. Adam Sent from ProtonMail Mobile On Fri, Jan 10, 2020 at 10:22 AM, Seymour J Metz wrote: >

Re: [SUSPECTED SPAM] Re: Job Posting

2020-01-10 Thread Tom Marchant
On Fri, 10 Jan 2020 19:06:43 +, Schuffenhauer, Mark wrote: >They can use whatever logo they want, and whatever representation >of their name they want. However, we still get to mock them and >decide to do business with them. And their indecision on picking a >clear name. And they can la

Re: [SUSPECTED SPAM] Re: Job Posting

2020-01-10 Thread Schuffenhauer, Mark
Jacobvitz Sent: Friday, January 10, 2020 12:31 PM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: [SUSPECTED SPAM] Re: Job Posting External Email A good name implies good banking practices. Adam Sent from ProtonMail Mobile On Fri, Jan 10, 2020 at 10:22 AM, Seymour J Metz wrote: > The logo may l

Re: [SUSPECTED SPAM] Re: Job Posting

2020-01-10 Thread Adam Jacobvitz
gmu.edu/~smetz3 > > > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List on behalf of > Joe Monk > Sent: Friday, January 10, 2020 1:04 PM > To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU > Subject: Re: [SUSPECTED SPAM] Re: Job Posting > > Technically it should be five thirds bank. > >

Re: [SUSPECTED SPAM] Re: Job Posting

2020-01-10 Thread Chris Hoelscher
But can I still get my johnny bench visa card? Thank You, Chris Hoelscher| Lead Database Administrator | IBM Global Technical Services| T 502.476.2538 or 502.407.7266 -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Mike Schwab Sent: Wednesday, January 8, 2020 2:23

Re: [SUSPECTED SPAM] Re: Job Posting

2020-01-10 Thread Seymour J Metz
The name is neither Fifth plus Third nor Fifth times Third. For those who believe that engineers have no sense of humor, look at "A stress analysis of a strapless evening gown, and other essays for a scientific age", Prentice Hall, ISBN 0-13-852608-7. -- Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz http://mason.g

Re: [SUSPECTED SPAM] Re: Job Posting

2020-01-10 Thread Seymour J Metz
Subject: Re: [SUSPECTED SPAM] Re: Job Posting Technically it should be five thirds bank. Joe On Fri, Jan 10, 2020, 11:53 Mike Schwab wrote: > Fifth is 1/5, Third is 1/3, > Fifth Third might be expressed as 1/5 1/3. > Maybe abbreviate to /5 /3 assuming the 1. > Improperly drop the fi

Re: [SUSPECTED SPAM] Re: Job Posting

2020-01-10 Thread Steve Smith
First, "Fifth" & "Third" are ordinal numbers in this context, not denominators. The slash in the logo is merely to distinguish it from "fifty-three". Second, since that looks like an (improper) fraction, some play on numbers came into use. And no one expected it to be subjected to meticulous scr

Re: [SUSPECTED SPAM] Re: Job Posting

2020-01-10 Thread Joe Monk
Technically it should be five thirds bank. Joe On Fri, Jan 10, 2020, 11:53 Mike Schwab wrote: > Fifth is 1/5, Third is 1/3, > Fifth Third might be expressed as 1/5 1/3. > Maybe abbreviate to /5 /3 assuming the 1. > Improperly drop the first / to get the 5/3. > > On Wed, Jan 8, 2020 at 12:34 PM