> Maybe you could use hunspell directly as your enchant? Not sure if
> that works, I'm not an emacs user.
Emacs does support several other spell checkers, but I want to use
enchant in order to share the user dictionary with other applications
that use enchant.
> With these, on Guix System, I was
Hi,
I ended up pushing two patches: the first one installs the required .aff files
along with the .dic files in hunspell-dict-en. The second adds hunspell as an
input to enchant.
With these, on Guix System, I was able to reproduce the behavior of debian's
enchant. Numerals are not marked as in
So I've look at it quickly. It seems our enchant is built only with aspell,
whereas debian is built with hunspell. In fact, our hunspell is able to detect
the misspellings, and does not flag numbers nor doesn't. Maybe you could use
hunspell directly as your enchant? Not sure if that works, I'm n
Em [2020-08-20 qui 15:35:00-0300], Jorge P. de Morais Neto escreveu:
> So enchant 2.2.8 (either from APT or from Guix) does not understand
> "doesn't"; and, what's worse, enchant-2.2.8 from Guix reports every
> numeral as a misspelling.
I now reread my experiment and realized enchant from Guix do
Hello. I reported Emacs bug#42248 and I and the Emacs developers
realized at least part of the problem is with Guix version of Enchant.
On an updated Debian bullseye, enchant 2.2.8 from Guix misreports
numerals. The same enchant upstream version, when installed from APT,
does not have this probl
