> Maybe you could use hunspell directly as your enchant? Not sure if > that works, I'm not an emacs user.
Emacs does support several other spell checkers, but I want to use enchant in order to share the user dictionary with other applications that use enchant. > With these, on Guix System, I was able to reproduce the behavior of > debian's enchant. Numerals are not marked as incorrect anymore. Yes, same here. Thank you! > Hunspell itself doesn't flag "doesn" as incorrect, whereas enchant > does, despite using the same dictionary. If this is also the case on > Debian, we might have found a bug in enchant. The command-line tool enchant-2 misreports "doesn't", but Gedit, which very probably uses Enchant, correctly accepts "doesn't and four other contractions I tested. It seems Gedit calls the enchant library in a different way than Enchant's own command-line tool. The reason to believe that Gedit uses Enchant are: 1. Wikipedia says so 2. Gedit's spell checker correctly accepts every word I have in the Enchant user dictionary. Best regards -- - <https://jorgemorais.gitlab.io/justice-for-rms/> - I am Brazilian. I hope my English is correct and I welcome feedback. - <https://www.defectivebydesign.org/> - <https://www.gnu.org/>
