Em [2020-08-20 qui 15:35:00-0300], Jorge P. de Morais Neto escreveu: > So enchant 2.2.8 (either from APT or from Guix) does not understand > "doesn't"; and, what's worse, enchant-2.2.8 from Guix reports every > numeral as a misspelling.
I now reread my experiment and realized enchant from Guix does understand "doesn't". So enchant 2.2.8 from Guix gets "doesn't" correctly, but not numerals, and enchant 2.2.8 from APT gets numerals correctly, but not "doesn't". Could enchant get both numerals and "doesn't" correctly? That would be ideal. Failing that, APT's enchant situation is much preferable than Guix's enchant. Regards -- - <https://jorgemorais.gitlab.io/justice-for-rms/> - If an email of mine arrives at your spam box, please notify me. - Please adopt free/libre formats like PDF, ODF, Org, LaTeX, Opus, WebM and 7z. - Free/libre software for Replicant, LineageOS and Android: https://f-droid.org - [[https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/free-sw.html][What is free software?]]
