* Ricardo Wurmus [2019-10-10 07:09]:
> I have previously asked you privately to stop spamming our mailing
> lists. I am asking you a second time publicly. If you keep disrupting
> our mailing lists your posts will be moderated.
Censorship is the suppression of speech, public communication, or o
Hello Guix!
I understand that my question is not related to guix. But I could not
think of better community to ask.
I am changing my career from Biotechnology to Information Technology. A
fresh re-start, as I do not have any prior educational or occupational
experience in IT. So I decided to take
Hi community!
My problem:
❯ cpanm -i Term::ReadLine::Gnu
Configure failed... See build.log for details.
Could not find neither libtermcap, libtinfo, libncurses, or libcurses.
❯ guix package -p /run/current-system/profile -I | grep ncurses
ncurses6.1out
/gnu/store/4h03mp5nggsblscs
ng0 writes [something]
Please keep the language here civil. We don’t need more anger on our
lists. If you feel frustrated, please take some time off email and (for
example) enjoy the local manifestation of autumn in your physical
environment. It is of no use to escalate by venting here.
Tha
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
On Thursday, October 10, 2019 7:22 PM, Jean Louis wrote:
> > Your problem is that you published this statement to guix-devel. If you
> > don't mind, I'll forward your mail to gnu-system-discuss, which is the
> > appropriate mailing list.
>
> I don't mind.
>
> Guix
On Thu, 2019-10-10 at 19:22 +, Jean Louis wrote:
>
>
> > Your problem is that you published this statement to guix-devel. If
> > you don't mind, I'll forward your mail to gnu-system-discuss, which
> > is the appropriate mailing list.
>
> I don't mind.
Sorry Jean Louis, I was addressing Ludo
On October 10, 2019 8:29:06 PM UTC, Dmitry Alexandrov <321...@gmail.com> wrote:
>Jean Louis wrote:
>> How are you?
>
>Ehm... Fine. What is the occasion to ask?
We are then from different cultures simply. At my side it is always used
similarly as hand shaking.
>> I [] see absolutely no prob
I kindly ask to remove this statement from the Guix site. It's
inappropriate, it's poisonous for the community (you can see this
clearly now). Anyone can have their own opinion in this discussion,
but _PLEASE_ can we divide OS development and politics?
There are more appropriate places to post such
P,
> And even before this incident, I've seen people say they don't want to
get into free software because of Stallman's behaviour and because people
defend him from any criticism.
So, why didn't you do anything before? why now? If it was a real issue that
would happen in before, not now.
> Don't
Jean Louis wrote:
> How are you?
Ehm... Fine. What is the occasion to ask?
> On October 10, 2019 12:39:00 PM UTC, Dmitry Alexandrov <321...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>>Did you move it offlist intentionally? If not, may I resend it back?
>
> Me for sure not intentionally and Guix managers are anywa
Problem is that such statements shall be valid all including for those who
created defamatory statements on Guix.GNU.org
Guix shall be hartass-free, but it is not, it is outrageous!
Jean
https://gnu.support/richard-stallman/Ludovic-Court%C3%A8s-Guix-is-accusing-Stallman-of-Thoughtcrime-on-his-o
On Thu, 2019-10-10 at 16:29 +0200, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> Hi Jean-Louis,
> You’ve made your point now; I see you’ve even set up a web page to
> collect hatred messages against me.
>
> I ask you to stop using the Guix mailing lists for this now. I will
> propose to the Guix maintainers to put y
How are you?
On October 10, 2019 12:39:00 PM UTC, Dmitry Alexandrov <321...@gmail.com> wrote:
>Did you move it offlist intentionally? If not, may I resend it back?
Me for sure not intentionally and Guix managers are anyway conducting
censorship... So no big deal.
You can resend what you wish.
It is not harmful if Guix remains free software, how it can be?
It is only harmful for Guix.
It was not my decision, it is theirs.
On October 10, 2019 11:39:42 AM UTC, Dmitry Alexandrov <321...@gmail.com> wrote:
>Jean Louis wrote:
>> * Alexander Vdolainen [2019-10-09 23:13]:
>> - and then wit
Did you move it offlist intentionally? If not, may I resend it back?
Jean Louis wrote:
> On October 10, 2019 11:39:42 AM UTC, Dmitry Alexandrov <321...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>>Jean Louis wrote:
>>> * Alexander Vdolainen [2019-10-09 23:13]:
>>> - and then within that group there is now a hostile
>Your problem is that you published this statement to guix-devel. If you
>don't mind, I'll forward your mail to gnu-system-discuss, which is the
>appropriate mailing list.
I don't mind.
Guix developers published biased and factless defamation of RMS on Guix pages.
I have told my concerns to
I have no hate against you and never had. Observe the log. You stated with
defamation and FUD, not me.
Your censorship policy is already well known. So block, I don't mind.
You are not answering with facts but bringing more and more fear, uncertainty,
and doubts into your own space and destroyi
Ludovic Courtès writes:
> Hi Jean-Louis,
>
> Jean Louis skribis:
>
>> * Ricardo Wurmus [2019-10-10 07:09]:
>>> I have previously asked you privately to stop spamming our mailing
>>> lists. I am asking you a second time publicly. If you keep disrupting
>>> our mailing lists your posts will be
Oi.
Shut up and get another audience for your monologue theater act.
I am no longer involved in guix that much, but your trash keeps
piling up in my inbox.
* Wilson Bustos [2019-10-09 17:41]:
> Jean Luis,
> Seems they don't want to reply, probably because they don't have argument.
> Also, the project signs without as anyone to do it, they just did it.
> There is not a vote to say 'The project is agree with this issue'.
>
> At least everyone now they
* František Kučera [2019-10-07 17:14]:
> > Hello Guix!
> >
> > We, a group of GNU maintainers sharing a vision for a stronger GNU
> > Project, are publishing this statement today:
> >
> >https://guix.gnu.org/blog/2019/joint-statement-on-the-gnu-project/
> >
> > We are somewhat abusing the G
* Wilson Bustos [2019-10-09 23:42]:
> Jean Luis,
> Seems they don't want to reply, probably because they don't have
> argument. Also, the project signs without as anyone to do it, they
> just did it. There is not a vote to say 'The project is agree with
> this issue'.
>
> At least everyone now
Jean Luis,
Seems they don't want to reply, probably because they don't have argument.
Also, the project signs without as anyone to do it, they just did it.
There is not a vote to say 'The project is agree with this issue'.
At least everyone now they don't want to discuss this.
Don't waste your ene
* Ricardo Wurmus [2019-10-10 07:09]:
> I have previously asked you privately to stop spamming our mailing
> lists. I am asking you a second time publicly. If you keep disrupting
> our mailing lists your posts will be moderated.
I cannot expect anything else from you.
Jean
* František Kučera [2019-10-09 16:39]:
> Dne 09. 10. 19 v 19:06 P napsal(a):
> > Stop spamming the list. Thanks.
> >
> If you did not want to start this discussion, you should not have posted
> that statement on the official Guix blog. You could expect what it would do.
>
> Franta
Exactly, that
* Dimakakos Dimos [2019-10-08 12:38]:
> On the subject, I think that the discussion of rms's position in GNU is
> valid but that at the same time such an announcment should be made after
> a careful consideration and research.
There was no public discussion. I am not against their opinion, and
an
* František Kučera [2019-10-09 18:11]:
> Dne 09. 10. 19 v 23:41 Wilson Bustos napsal(a):
> > Seems they don't want to reply, probably because they don't have argument.
> > Also, the project signs without as anyone to do it, they just did it.
> > There is not a vote to say 'The project is agree wit
* Andy Wingo [2019-10-09 11:49]:
> For what it is worth, I have some personal answers to some of these
> questions here:
>
> https://wingolog.org/archives/2019/10/08/thoughts-on-rms-and-gnu
I am appreciating that you are publishing your opinions beyond the
GUIX.GNU.ORG and GNU.ORG domains. Tha
* Wilson Bustos [2019-10-09 23:54]:
> I think even more important,
> When I read that statement I thought every Guix collaborator is in
> favor of that statement, or at least a major number of them.
And that is exactly what is not being spread on Internet.
I would like to ask those "GNU maintai
* Ludovic Courtès [2019-10-07 17:41]:
> Hi František, and welcome,
>
> (I’m willing to answer questions like I wrote, but if we are to have a
> more in-depth conversation, I think we should not abuse guix-devel for
> that.)
Now is too late, you are the one who abused Guix, and you should step
do
* Alexander Vdolainen [2019-10-09 23:13]:
> I'm nobody (yep, I'm using GNU Guile, GNU Emacs and GUIX and a lot
> of other GNU projects (make, gcc, binutils etc ...), but I'm not a
> great contributor yet). However those events are going to look like
> a decision point to move on from GNU communit
Hi Jean-Louis,
Jean Louis skribis:
> * Ricardo Wurmus [2019-10-10 07:09]:
>> I have previously asked you privately to stop spamming our mailing
>> lists. I am asking you a second time publicly. If you keep disrupting
>> our mailing lists your posts will be moderated.
>
> I cannot expect anyth
Jean Louis wrote:
> * Alexander Vdolainen [2019-10-09 23:13]:
> - and then within that group there is now a hostile takeover group of people
> starting with Ludovic Courtès and his "fellows" where none of them could
> answer my email to provide me with the facts about their statement. They are
Jesse Gibbons writes:
> I work on a virtual machine generated with "guix system vm-image". Due to
> the recent core updates, the vm image will need to fall out of date unless
> it can be updated and reconfigured. Right now, the best way to reconfigure
> the vm image is to copy the system definit
34 matches
Mail list logo
