I think this is fantastic are there sources (srpms) available?
My two cents on the lsb: Personally I have used both and have no
favorite. I don't think we can move the /var/cfengine/bin to
/opt/cfengine/bin like we had as an option in v2 at build time. V3
seems to be more static in the build to be
What do these messages mean and why am I getting so many of them from each run
of this promise?
"/var/opt/ids/error\.log\.[0-9]{1,2}"
transformer => "/bin/compress -f $(this.promiser)";
Directory /var in search path /var/opt/ids/error\.log\.[0-9]{1,2} is controlled
b
On 2/23/10 12:15 PM, "Mark Burgess" wrote:
> Sorry, I misread. Already looking at this, but not next release.
Thanks, and to be fair, I also misread cf-execd as cf-serverd in Neil's
original post... Though the preference of being able to control
auto-restart behavior (regardless of which daemon)
Sorry, I misread. Already looking at this, but not next release.
Mark Burgess wrote:
> CFserverd already rereads its config when it changes.
>
> michoski wrote:
>> On 2/23/10 11:21 AM, "nwat...@symcor.com" wrote:
>>> Classes and case.
>>> I'm very lazy. I'd prefer if Hr13 and hr13 were the sam
For posterity there is a way to do this. I was referred to the
pcrepattern man page in a separate thread.Here is a working example.
[nwat...@unxxhd01 inputs]$ cat bar.cf
##
body common control {
bundlesequence => { "test" };
}
bundle agent test {
classes:
CFserverd already rereads its config when it changes.
michoski wrote:
> On 2/23/10 11:21 AM, "nwat...@symcor.com" wrote:
>> Classes and case.
>> I'm very lazy. I'd prefer if Hr13 and hr13 were the same. The really
>> annoying hard classes are the likes of SuSE, which I can never remember.
>> W
On 2/23/10 11:21 AM, "nwat...@symcor.com" wrote:
> Classes and case.
> I'm very lazy. I'd prefer if Hr13 and hr13 were the same. The really
> annoying hard classes are the likes of SuSE, which I can never remember.
> Why can't it be suse?
+1
> I wish that Community cf-execd would reread config
These are more observations I've made over the past little while. Not
criticism just things I would think of doing were I king for the day.
Classes and case.
I'm very lazy. I'd prefer if Hr13 and hr13 were the same. The really
annoying hard classes are the likes of SuSE, which I can never rem
I agree it probably shouldn't do this, but for us it has only happened
a handful of time over the last 3 years on thousands of systems so it
wasn't worth debugging further. For us originally, purging /inputs
helped combat errant configurations, although now we use other
external methods to solve t
edit_line is a "subroutine", do either
--
vars:
"lines" string =>
"
/scripts
/batch..
";
files:
"/etc/auto_direct"
comment => "Installing /batch and /scripts",
create => "true",
I view one edit line as one promise. Having multiple edit lines muddies
the promise water. You could try placing your lines in a list and have a
single promise process the list.
Complex example:
http://www.cfengine.org/manuals/cf3-solutions.html#Postfix-mail-configuration
Sincerely,
--
Neil Wa
Hello
I'm trying to add two lines into a file using the edit_line statement
My code looks as follows -
TestServers::
"/etc/auto_direct"
comment => "Installing /batch and /scripts",
create => "true",
edit_line => ap
Alas, I only have access to SVN from home, in the evenings.
Sincerely,
--
Neil Watson
416-673-3465
CONFIDENTIALITY WARNING
This communication, including any attachments, is for the exclusive use of
addressee and may contain proprietary and/or confidential information. If you
are not the inten
That's what svn is for ;-)
nwat...@symcor.com wrote:
> What version did cf-runagent begin to take the --hail option?
>
> Sincerely,
> --
> Neil Watson
> 416-673-3465
>
>
>
>
>
>
> CONFIDENTIALITY WARNING
> This commun
What version did cf-runagent begin to take the --hail option?
Sincerely,
--
Neil Watson
416-673-3465
CONFIDENTIALITY WARNING
This communication, including any attachments, is for the exclusive use of
addressee and may contain proprietary and/or confidential information. If you
are not the int
Yes
nwat...@symcor.com wrote:
> Will this fix make to 3.0.4 due out soon?
>
> Sincerely,
> --
> Neil Watson
> 416-673-3465
>
>
>
>
>
>
> CONFIDENTIALITY WARNING
> This communication, including any attachments, is for
Will this fix make to 3.0.4 due out soon?
Sincerely,
--
Neil Watson
416-673-3465
CONFIDENTIALITY WARNING
This communication, including any attachments, is for the exclusive use of
addressee and may contain proprietary and/or confidential information. If you
are not the intended recipient, any
This is a simple thing. Fixed in svn
nwat...@symcor.com wrote:
> Greetings,
>
> Yesterday I had troubles building cf3.0.2 on rhel 5 32 bit. Cf-promises
> -x segfaulted. Today I tried again on another host, same architecture.
> The result was the same. Now I've tried the same thing but with
Greetings,
Yesterday I had troubles building cf3.0.2 on rhel 5 32 bit. Cf-promises
-x segfaulted. Today I tried again on another host, same architecture.
The result was the same. Now I've tried the same thing but with version
3.0.3. Still the problem persists. I used a straight configure w
Now on line at our Technical Corner is a conversion sampler, that
enables you to perform a limited conversion of portions of configuration
from Cfengine 2 to Cfengine 3. To convert larger samples more
completely, you can arrange professional services with Cfengine AS/Inc.
https://cfengine.com/ins
20 matches
Mail list logo
