I think this is fantastic are there sources (srpms) available? My two cents on the lsb: Personally I have used both and have no favorite. I don't think we can move the /var/cfengine/bin to /opt/cfengine/bin like we had as an option in v2 at build time. V3 seems to be more static in the build to be in its own "app" space. I think Mark has written on this before on the list. Ideally after running a few years with an LSB package, I think the more isolated approach is an easier method in a long running environments. Just my two cents I know there is a lot of passion on the lsb... :-)
-Gusto On Sat, Feb 20, 2010 at 6:09 AM, milo...@gmail.com <milo...@gmail.com> wrote: >> For those who did not join the Cfengine Facebook group, Cfengine is now >> giving away Community Edition Packages for Linux distros on the Tech >> Corner, to assist users in upgrading. Login and go to MySpace. > > Thanks for that, it makes upgrade/deployment much easier! > > I set up some system with the community rpm for CentOS 5 x86-64 and I > noticed that "redhat-lsb" package is needed, but the cfengine > community package does not depend on it. > > I wasn't able to find any .spec or src.rpm, so I can't send a patch against > it. > > > Regards, > > Miklos > _______________________________________________ > Help-cfengine mailing list > Help-cfengine@cfengine.org > https://cfengine.org/mailman/listinfo/help-cfengine > _______________________________________________ Help-cfengine mailing list Help-cfengine@cfengine.org https://cfengine.org/mailman/listinfo/help-cfengine
